From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from pigeon.gentoo.org ([69.77.167.62] helo=lists.gentoo.org) by finch.gentoo.org with esmtp (Exim 4.60) (envelope-from ) id 1Julq7-0005M6-PP for garchives@archives.gentoo.org; Sat, 10 May 2008 09:58:03 +0000 Received: from pigeon.gentoo.org (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by pigeon.gentoo.org (Postfix) with SMTP id C7C69E055B; Sat, 10 May 2008 09:58:01 +0000 (UTC) Received: from smtp.gentoo.org (smtp.gentoo.org [140.211.166.183]) by pigeon.gentoo.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 9C924E055B for ; Sat, 10 May 2008 09:58:01 +0000 (UTC) Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by smtp.gentoo.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id CA89D67A61; Sat, 10 May 2008 09:58:00 +0000 (UTC) From: Mike Frysinger Organization: wh0rd.org To: gentoo-dev@lists.gentoo.org Subject: Re: [gentoo-dev] RFC: lzma tarball usage Date: Sat, 10 May 2008 05:57:58 -0400 User-Agent: KMail/1.9.7 Cc: Fabian Groffen References: <1210166592.19574.10.camel@localhost> <200805100332.09349.vapier@gentoo.org> <20080510073641.GS16108@gentoo.org> In-Reply-To: <20080510073641.GS16108@gentoo.org> Precedence: bulk List-Post: List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Subscribe: List-Id: Gentoo Linux mail X-BeenThere: gentoo-dev@lists.gentoo.org Reply-to: gentoo-dev@lists.gentoo.org MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/signed; boundary="nextPart46558371.YXGtD2Ys8h"; protocol="application/pgp-signature"; micalg=pgp-sha1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Message-Id: <200805100557.59521.vapier@gentoo.org> X-Archives-Salt: b2fe48dd-d1e7-4e60-bd65-f6bd8b265ad4 X-Archives-Hash: 056715341a3bc5b41def4325791e9bb0 --nextPart46558371.YXGtD2Ys8h Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Content-Disposition: inline On Saturday 10 May 2008, Fabian Groffen wrote: > On 10-05-2008 03:32:08 -0400, Mike Frysinger wrote: > > On Wednesday 07 May 2008, Fabian Groffen wrote: > > > m4, that one gave me some headaches, because lzma-utils required some > > > eautoreconf, which introduced a nice cycle. > > > > must have been a prefix-only bug as the version in the tree never did > > Ehmm... you're right. Sorry about that. ive added a comment to the ebuild so as to future proof me or anyone else=20 forgetting about this gotcha. =2Dmike --nextPart46558371.YXGtD2Ys8h Content-Type: application/pgp-signature; name=signature.asc Content-Description: This is a digitally signed message part. -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v2.0.7 (GNU/Linux) iQIVAwUASCVxp0FjO5/oN/WBAQJaZA//Tcommg3DfhZrdSc1p2hcD+l/1Oehazga zmsQfbKm60gpyCceIbYYcTcJf3ICQcKTVE6Mo1037IEjPe/hlFS0pYOde19KQLiL 4OPLh3lSmkMfwnsAP7WDbP34Dye3ukhSRSCN3hnjl/GAuDw48c2MGGI1h9uc+IYt iGLeo1SsB2B7lnUimoX8DxIeCxRZyHm2l3/bXYgi7KAocmx795p4GIeNhVjXVIPP i1FYl+/nYDCqvO85Wnv8J9nMD3ST/GirVOy6mBVdnHeM/XFXFO6o2lk2EMHWiK1l j1hy6Y2UP/Y333+hTDFut7mmeWM58Aug/k8ZGEW1wiHkrsJg2XOnGnC9EQdRTeX0 xgdjzwbt6NsMaZCbmRwyewknrIFlJg9+NBOsRW0I0tuGuDi5Csp0zhGWZ1bm3b9s oUtUVzv1fuZrwBF6Eh3bAQvalX4V5vy3izG+k5DlDA4wIqN7bx0z5UERfCPXkwlJ 9j4RQpc4WgmUPYqixFPaDuFJLAnzEG8+XJpmtChO+wEIKbzDSrPwOo2ufiix+3NT +i7qN4l0+zYmnoZAqAVRa34r/0ps5vCc2rnNx2TUq5dOtwrHRXvKtrq+ZE25YXLq bsCPGWD9fOkK9X1g1jbjb1PKs/Wqa0+PCvQ+8CzJF7hO62L8+6jtU1G1qxfDroH4 WVFcwZaNQ2U= =LN0v -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --nextPart46558371.YXGtD2Ys8h-- -- gentoo-dev@lists.gentoo.org mailing list