From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from pigeon.gentoo.org ([69.77.167.62] helo=lists.gentoo.org) by finch.gentoo.org with esmtp (Exim 4.60) (envelope-from ) id 1Ju45l-0004gr-ID for garchives@archives.gentoo.org; Thu, 08 May 2008 11:15:17 +0000 Received: from pigeon.gentoo.org (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by pigeon.gentoo.org (Postfix) with SMTP id 1343AE007E; Thu, 8 May 2008 11:15:16 +0000 (UTC) Received: from wa-out-1112.google.com (wa-out-1112.google.com [209.85.146.179]) by pigeon.gentoo.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id CD81CE007E for ; Thu, 8 May 2008 11:15:15 +0000 (UTC) Received: by wa-out-1112.google.com with SMTP id m34so941398wag.10 for ; Thu, 08 May 2008 04:15:15 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=domainkey-signature:received:received:date:from:to:subject:message-id:references:mime-version:content-type:content-disposition:in-reply-to:user-agent; bh=Bt/g/AV9LNN+fIJ9+Z7lwezIzjzKI03ehnsClfcMki8=; b=d2tNXw4TQGutX9IAW4FeBpqJF1hMmBlObw++B9fycTWk8HGgrVLGBWXhGl0NLkOOAUM/wpdbGs3K31syiZNqehtfXIhnpwPa6BCe0IrkSVoibJKq0fBu0NYARf3+yMP2zcB8ufzwBQIyDfb9PfddI//VKDKXSztceS4dntW73Bs= DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=date:from:to:subject:message-id:references:mime-version:content-type:content-disposition:in-reply-to:user-agent; b=NWmOX+ie34cgTLFD8eOZhC0hfk0JeHfKgWvkxEB7ZPLXPT8g694Y5KPPdRt01Jey8lkNuSWPfFSZPpfn7o44TFfumrdfgCdOp9QcLN1Ytptc7oVX8cRDCRKlxK1g8nINtgR9KKMH3i4Rk54J1Dl5xtRLhyCXH2CKuWgwCKZMDB4= Received: by 10.114.25.19 with SMTP id 19mr2908318way.225.1210245315286; Thu, 08 May 2008 04:15:15 -0700 (PDT) Received: from seldon ( [71.204.151.29]) by mx.google.com with ESMTPS id n22sm6463402pof.3.2008.05.08.04.15.13 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=RC4-MD5); Thu, 08 May 2008 04:15:14 -0700 (PDT) Date: Thu, 8 May 2008 04:15:10 -0700 From: Brian Harring To: gentoo-dev@lists.gentoo.org Subject: Re: [gentoo-dev] One-Day Gentoo Council Reminder for May Message-ID: <20080508111509.GB6805@seldon.hsd1.ca.comcast.net> References: <20080507070448.C2C7366AC1@smtp.gentoo.org> <20080508090345.GA29904@comet.had1.or.comcast.net> <20080508105715.GA6805@seldon.hsd1.ca.comcast.net> <20080508120119.76429c6d@snowcone> Precedence: bulk List-Post: List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Subscribe: List-Id: Gentoo Linux mail X-BeenThere: gentoo-dev@lists.gentoo.org Reply-to: gentoo-dev@lists.gentoo.org MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/signed; micalg=pgp-sha1; protocol="application/pgp-signature"; boundary="PmA2V3Z32TCmWXqI" Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <20080508120119.76429c6d@snowcone> User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.13 (2006-08-11) X-Archives-Salt: 98b50435-1f61-4ff4-a7d5-36deaace04f7 X-Archives-Hash: d88345cbbf19830d8c5db80ae5983249 --PmA2V3Z32TCmWXqI Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable On Thu, May 08, 2008 at 12:01:19PM +0100, Ciaran McCreesh wrote: > On Thu, 8 May 2008 03:57:16 -0700 > Brian Harring wrote: > > On Thu, May 08, 2008 at 02:03:45AM -0700, Donnie Berkholz wrote: > > > Requested attendees > > > =3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D > > >=20 > > > PMS: ciaranm, pkgcore dev, portage dev, any other tools that care > > > about versions > >=20 > > Might I suggest that if PMS is going to be discussed, a copy of=20 > > PMS.pdf actually be available somewhere? Preferably with the=20 > > kdebuild-1 crap stripped out... >=20 > Might I suggest that you read the agenda rather than going completely > off topic like last time? If PMS is going to be discussed in some form, it's a fair request that=20 folks have an easily readable version. Insane enough, loosening the 8 digit version restriction can have=20 other implications- very least, verifying that bash 3.0 is when [[ ]]=20 support was introduced since [ ] breaks down for long long from a=20 quick look. That's off the top of the head- could be more. Actually=20 having a pdf to read would make that a helluva lot easier too. Course, it's way more fun to just bitch at me then build a pdf so=20 others can look at the current spec for the discussion at hand (bugs=20 are one thing, looking at the actual spec is another). One thing I wouldn't mind the council discussing is whether or not the=20 recent behaviour re: pms on -dev is acceptable for running a project-=20 it's not exactly engendering cooperation. Feel free to delay that=20 till the next month, or ignore it (y'alls court after all). ~brian --PmA2V3Z32TCmWXqI Content-Type: application/pgp-signature Content-Disposition: inline -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v1.4.7 (GNU/Linux) iD8DBQFIIuC9siLx3HvNzgcRAqu5AKCw5HrHPc/tXcnX+akmHsvm+g4sAACfeTYx 2ZmvHTFQw/xSjeZfGoXtyA0= =rlyF -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --PmA2V3Z32TCmWXqI-- -- gentoo-dev@lists.gentoo.org mailing list