From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from pigeon.gentoo.org ([69.77.167.62] helo=lists.gentoo.org) by finch.gentoo.org with esmtp (Exim 4.60) (envelope-from ) id 1JtK11-0002v6-Cg for garchives@archives.gentoo.org; Tue, 06 May 2008 10:03:19 +0000 Received: from pigeon.gentoo.org (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by pigeon.gentoo.org (Postfix) with SMTP id 87445E03B1; Tue, 6 May 2008 10:03:17 +0000 (UTC) Received: from ug-out-1314.google.com (ug-out-1314.google.com [66.249.92.169]) by pigeon.gentoo.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 48EEDE03B1 for ; Tue, 6 May 2008 10:03:17 +0000 (UTC) Received: by ug-out-1314.google.com with SMTP id z27so879414ugc.49 for ; Tue, 06 May 2008 03:03:16 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=googlemail.com; s=gamma; h=domainkey-signature:received:received:date:from:to:subject:message-id:in-reply-to:references:x-mailer:mime-version:content-type; bh=lK0javqxvMKNPAYF2OrF1Avmqny2UhM9XQI6mxbA390=; b=QbhXYaBS+G+ENHiHwLOtyCOdur+IS2tLTBI6vBrS6CMXxN6iY+y/0bTAsdeG220y5PAT0iRwXIdwWqf+p6+KiGicvSuLXs+l/mbYQYKXBWQIyTw5dDB7+w8ynQz2VIZl/aBgesGVoD6KVc9p/q/h7tBFBgCwcdIsB4QiAH+DwdI= DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws; d=googlemail.com; s=gamma; h=date:from:to:subject:message-id:in-reply-to:references:x-mailer:mime-version:content-type; b=RFVce9WJ8TTBMl0ZtlGPtyOWrP0IQW6yL6rvrXIWrwJ/uDlj0ointVDH8QEItA7VOspALtrOvoKigH11IUlfQFia42RbnvmpIS8xPaoUpLc4KqCHYlxxHjuWXjAfy0NNXa2ysygnZD0hjxHEasu5tFOG54EBeOSZelTWKsa99MU= Received: by 10.67.115.9 with SMTP id s9mr5795402ugm.81.1210068196335; Tue, 06 May 2008 03:03:16 -0700 (PDT) Received: from snowcone ( [213.121.151.206]) by mx.google.com with ESMTPS id y7sm3502501ugc.3.2008.05.06.03.03.15 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=RC4-MD5); Tue, 06 May 2008 03:03:15 -0700 (PDT) Date: Tue, 6 May 2008 11:03:07 +0100 From: Ciaran McCreesh To: gentoo-dev@lists.gentoo.org Subject: Re: [gentoo-dev] Monthly Gentoo Council Reminder for May Message-ID: <20080506110307.7c691d22@snowcone> In-Reply-To: <20080501092955.9368266EB2@smtp.gentoo.org> References: <20080501092955.9368266EB2@smtp.gentoo.org> X-Mailer: Claws Mail 3.3.1 (GTK+ 2.12.9; x86_64-pc-linux-gnu) Precedence: bulk List-Post: List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Subscribe: List-Id: Gentoo Linux mail X-BeenThere: gentoo-dev@lists.gentoo.org Reply-to: gentoo-dev@lists.gentoo.org Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/signed; boundary="Sig_/NlanD/_skIH=nvVHQg3ZzF8"; protocol="application/pgp-signature"; micalg=PGP-SHA1 X-Archives-Salt: 8729c2b3-cd21-41b5-a76f-4b0e76de9031 X-Archives-Hash: c3c79b07df692c0fe970774111180127 --Sig_/NlanD/_skIH=nvVHQg3ZzF8 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable On 01 May 2008 05:30:01 Mike Frysinger wrote: > If you have something you'd wish for us to chat about, maybe even > vote on, let us know ! Simply reply to this e-mail for the whole > Gentoo dev list to see. I'd like a decision on the eight digits thing in PMS: > No integer part of a version specification may contain more than eight > digits. It's been discussed on this list previously: http://archives.gentoo.org/gentoo-dev/msg_db2f5c09c2c0c8b042ca3d0dcec7cdaf.= xml and on bugzilla: https://bugs.gentoo.org/show_bug.cgi?id=3D188449 and I get the impression that there aren't any particularly strong feelings either way. So can we get a Council ruling to either kill the limit and strongly encourage people to fix their code, or keep the limit and start enforcing it and fixing it in the tree via repoman etc? --=20 Ciaran McCreesh --Sig_/NlanD/_skIH=nvVHQg3ZzF8 Content-Type: application/pgp-signature; name=signature.asc Content-Disposition: attachment; filename=signature.asc -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v2.0.7 (GNU/Linux) iD8DBQFIICzg96zL6DUtXhERAnJhAKCb5uu3rGTH7aFvJ3bEy3eBk6K/9gCgrCh6 aJZildwFDFqd+DJDJS1pCxo= =+O0V -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --Sig_/NlanD/_skIH=nvVHQg3ZzF8-- -- gentoo-dev@lists.gentoo.org mailing list