From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from pigeon.gentoo.org ([69.77.167.62] helo=lists.gentoo.org) by finch.gentoo.org with esmtp (Exim 4.60) (envelope-from ) id 1JmF79-0008I4-QD for garchives@archives.gentoo.org; Wed, 16 Apr 2008 21:24:24 +0000 Received: from pigeon.gentoo.org (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by pigeon.gentoo.org (Postfix) with SMTP id 5E013E082D; Wed, 16 Apr 2008 21:24:21 +0000 (UTC) Received: from 5-meo-dmt.ynet.sk (5-meo-dmt.ynet.sk [147.175.167.220]) by pigeon.gentoo.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 18E35E082D for ; Wed, 16 Apr 2008 21:24:21 +0000 (UTC) Received: from localhost (localhost.localdomain [127.0.0.1]) by 5-meo-dmt.ynet.sk (Postfix) with ESMTP id C2BF71807561 for ; Wed, 16 Apr 2008 23:23:35 +0200 (CEST) X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at X-Spam-Flag: NO X-Spam-Score: -0.831 X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-0.831 tagged_above=-10 required=6.6 tests=[AWL=-0.048, BAYES_00=-2.599, DNS_FROM_OPENWHOIS=1.13, SPF_NEUTRAL=0.686] Received: from 5-meo-dmt.ynet.sk ([127.0.0.1]) by localhost (5-meo-dmt.ynet.sk [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id iQVKMcRCvGvI for ; Wed, 16 Apr 2008 23:23:32 +0200 (CEST) Received: from daria.ynet.sk (daria.ynet.sk [147.175.178.246]) by 5-meo-dmt.ynet.sk (Postfix) with ESMTP id CED851807560 for ; Wed, 16 Apr 2008 23:23:32 +0200 (CEST) Received: from thelair.ticho.local (vthelair [192.168.111.2]) by daria.ynet.sk (Postfix) with ESMTP id 144E9F1B08 for ; Wed, 16 Apr 2008 23:24:16 +0200 (CEST) Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by thelair.ticho.local (Postfix) with ESMTP id EA361888094 for ; Wed, 16 Apr 2008 23:24:15 +0200 (CEST) Date: Wed, 16 Apr 2008 23:24:10 +0200 From: Andrej Kacian To: gentoo-dev@lists.gentoo.org Subject: Re: [gentoo-dev] Re: What are blocks used for? Message-ID: <20080416232410.735a3ec8@gentoo.org> In-Reply-To: <4806306E.6040304@o2.pl> References: <20080416062452.45f3831d@snowcone> <20080416072413.GA23808@comet> <4805B114.6000308@o2.pl> <20080416090408.5ada387b@snowcone> <4805B65D.8050200@o2.pl> <4805F143.7020108@o2.pl> <4805F16D.6090303@gentoo.org> <4806306E.6040304@o2.pl> Organization: chaotic at best... X-Mailer: Claws Mail 3.3.1cvs52 (GTK+ 2.12.8; i686-pc-linux-gnu) Precedence: bulk List-Post: List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Subscribe: List-Id: Gentoo Linux mail X-BeenThere: gentoo-dev@lists.gentoo.org Reply-to: gentoo-dev@lists.gentoo.org Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/signed; boundary="Sig_/3aVv9IcVWEUIhrDXBYD2Kzq"; protocol="application/pgp-signature"; micalg=PGP-SHA1 X-Archives-Salt: 0087f951-4277-4a35-a65d-26a100014e2d X-Archives-Hash: d257851088d2d422dc5da57ff5e64027 --Sig_/3aVv9IcVWEUIhrDXBYD2Kzq Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable On Wed, 16 Apr 2008 18:59:26 +0200 "Mateusz A. Mierzwi=C5=84ski" wrote: > I just want to know that Gentoo will be usable for me and my client's=20 > that I provide Gentoo Linux support. I recommending Gentoo whatever I=20 > can, but when I see what happens than I starting to worry. If you really saw what is happening in this thread (other than noise created by yourself), you would understand that it will make Gentoo better by handl= ing blocks more gracefully and in a much more user-friendly way. Regards, --=20 Andrej "Ticho" Kacian Gentoo Linux Developer - net-mail, antivirus, x86 --Sig_/3aVv9IcVWEUIhrDXBYD2Kzq Content-Type: application/pgp-signature; name=signature.asc Content-Disposition: attachment; filename=signature.asc -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v2.0.7 (GNU/Linux) iD8DBQFIBm5+QlM6RnzZP+IRAnpTAJ9mjXNV3W8lbyQe3cC8n1OD7dxjdwCffXmC Xg/KCeC0fH/ZTceIg6hMdPY= =5+Et -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --Sig_/3aVv9IcVWEUIhrDXBYD2Kzq-- -- gentoo-dev@lists.gentoo.org mailing list