From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from pigeon.gentoo.org ([69.77.167.62] helo=lists.gentoo.org) by finch.gentoo.org with esmtp (Exim 4.60) (envelope-from ) id 1JhSlv-0001dt-Fs for garchives@archives.gentoo.org; Thu, 03 Apr 2008 16:58:43 +0000 Received: from pigeon.gentoo.org (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by pigeon.gentoo.org (Postfix) with SMTP id 70913E0924; Thu, 3 Apr 2008 16:58:42 +0000 (UTC) Received: from smtp.gentoo.org (smtp.gentoo.org [140.211.166.183]) by pigeon.gentoo.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 49940E0924 for ; Thu, 3 Apr 2008 16:58:42 +0000 (UTC) Received: from gentoo.org (xray.science.oregonstate.edu [128.193.220.51]) (using TLSv1 with cipher DHE-RSA-AES128-SHA (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by smtp.gentoo.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id E31BE6675B for ; Thu, 3 Apr 2008 16:58:41 +0000 (UTC) Date: Thu, 3 Apr 2008 09:58:40 -0700 From: Donnie Berkholz To: gentoo-dev@lists.gentoo.org Subject: Re: [gentoo-dev] Monthly Gentoo Council Reminder for April Message-ID: <20080403165840.GB1606@comet.science.oregonstate.edu> References: <20080401092610.EEF7467349@smtp.gentoo.org> <47F3F098.1050508@gentoo.org> <47F3F860.6080200@gentoo.org> <47F3FA1C.7010407@gentoo.org> <47F4395A.3000509@gentoo.org> <47F4B9FC.2010907@gentoo.org> <47F4C0F8.7040906@gentoo.org> <20080403135345.GA30471@spoc> Precedence: bulk List-Post: List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Subscribe: List-Id: Gentoo Linux mail X-BeenThere: gentoo-dev@lists.gentoo.org Reply-to: gentoo-dev@lists.gentoo.org MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <20080403135345.GA30471@spoc> User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.17 (2007-11-01) X-Archives-Salt: 0763ec00-95f9-4612-b6de-9afdbbee33e2 X-Archives-Hash: a997971389c41e5dfd13ec4cfd02d897 On 09:53 Thu 03 Apr , Thomas Anderson wrote: > On 11:35 Thu 03 Apr , Jorge Manuel B. S. Vicetto wrote: > > Petteri R??ty wrote: > >>> Recalling previous discussions about work on gentoo and some of the > >>> existing roles, what will you do to AT folks, release members or QA > >>> members? Are they also obliged to do a weekly commit to keep their > >>> "privileges"? > >> AT folks aren't devs and see above. > > > > To be clear, I didn't meant arch testers but people that do keywords for > > arch teams. > > Actually, 'AT' can refer to either arch teams or Arch Testers, but given > the fact that he was referring to those people with commit access, it > should be obvious he meant 'Arch Teams'. It wasn't obvious at all to me, because he was talking about people who would have trouble keeping commit access. My understanding is that arch team members are constantly testing and keywording. Thanks, Donnie -- gentoo-dev@lists.gentoo.org mailing list