From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970
Received: from pigeon.gentoo.org ([69.77.167.62] helo=lists.gentoo.org)
by finch.gentoo.org with esmtp (Exim 4.60)
(envelope-from <gentoo-dev+bounces-30182-garchives=archives.gentoo.org@lists.gentoo.org>)
id 1JhPhK-0002ma-1n
for garchives@archives.gentoo.org; Thu, 03 Apr 2008 13:41:46 +0000
Received: from pigeon.gentoo.org (localhost [127.0.0.1])
by pigeon.gentoo.org (Postfix) with SMTP id 64C91E0AC5;
Thu, 3 Apr 2008 13:41:44 +0000 (UTC)
Received: from wf-out-1314.google.com (wf-out-1314.google.com [209.85.200.174])
by pigeon.gentoo.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 38253E0AC5
for <gentoo-dev@lists.gentoo.org>; Thu, 3 Apr 2008 13:41:44 +0000 (UTC)
Received: by wf-out-1314.google.com with SMTP id 27so3156352wfd.10
for <gentoo-dev@lists.gentoo.org>; Thu, 03 Apr 2008 06:41:43 -0700 (PDT)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed;
d=gmail.com; s=beta;
h=domainkey-signature:received:received:received:date:from:to:subject:message-id:mail-followup-to:references:mime-version:content-type:content-disposition:in-reply-to:user-agent;
bh=Y2YWu09aF2IE5zLTgwbCRib9R0LZa3M+CEI5tHwjNs0=;
b=Iv2NOGFr1w2DjHZ+iYgE8WSkplauHOEi3zzWwgFAcijkUjepgAXAFMW97gsUXhimdhyPRMEMOKlg4s9Jn/hefOJ1cMdDYK2LUF7sDKE81mRHVuyF1QlwMdyOUQJzLkGZOZdlZKWV3Ibv8Vp+/JY8CS5hdGeXYHIU6hsBAxozE9U=
DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws;
d=gmail.com; s=beta;
h=date:from:to:subject:message-id:mail-followup-to:references:mime-version:content-type:content-disposition:in-reply-to:user-agent;
b=iClBXHeb7s6XGRzFsFIsG54wAQSdxfiSvqFtejbMHbkm6p+Eg59+AfHhx90uCTbslLpedp1Ap/wyYsO8lAgYJhhCCKq8MGaJQPTSFD9FZPR22Pk0Ih0j1Ucpz/oqUP0ebLPOiBgQEZ1j/GfPLR1DYnhe2oo2o3//VKasHFO8L+s=
Received: by 10.142.58.9 with SMTP id g9mr4834891wfa.44.1207230103729;
Thu, 03 Apr 2008 06:41:43 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from smtp.gmail.com ( [66.19.241.187])
by mx.google.com with ESMTPS id 27sm6597479wff.8.2008.04.03.06.41.18
(version=SSLv3 cipher=OTHER);
Thu, 03 Apr 2008 06:41:42 -0700 (PDT)
Received: by smtp.gmail.com (nbSMTP-1.00) for uid 1001
(using TLSv1/SSLv3 with cipher DES-CBC3-SHA (168/168 bits))
gentoofan23@gmail.com; Thu, 3 Apr 2008 09:53:50 -0400 (EDT)
Date: Thu, 3 Apr 2008 09:53:45 -0400
From: Thomas Anderson <gentoofan23@gmail.com>
To: gentoo-dev@lists.gentoo.org
Subject: Re: [gentoo-dev] Monthly Gentoo Council Reminder for April
Message-ID: <20080403135345.GA30471@spoc>
Mail-Followup-To: gentoo-dev@lists.gentoo.org
References: <20080401092610.EEF7467349@smtp.gentoo.org> <47F3F098.1050508@gentoo.org> <47F3F860.6080200@gentoo.org> <47F3FA1C.7010407@gentoo.org> <47F4395A.3000509@gentoo.org> <47F4B9FC.2010907@gentoo.org> <47F4C0F8.7040906@gentoo.org>
Precedence: bulk
List-Post: <mailto:gentoo-dev@lists.gentoo.org>
List-Help: <mailto:gentoo-dev+help@lists.gentoo.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <mailto:gentoo-dev+unsubscribe@lists.gentoo.org>
List-Subscribe: <mailto:gentoo-dev+subscribe@lists.gentoo.org>
List-Id: Gentoo Linux mail <gentoo-dev.gentoo.org>
X-BeenThere: gentoo-dev@lists.gentoo.org
Reply-to: gentoo-dev@lists.gentoo.org
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Disposition: inline
In-Reply-To: <47F4C0F8.7040906@gentoo.org>
User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.16 (2007-06-09)
X-Archives-Salt: 27ab8b5b-9e3a-4a08-b136-d102d8de1736
X-Archives-Hash: 15565349503d038417bef545a15e2971
On 11:35 Thu 03 Apr , Jorge Manuel B. S. Vicetto wrote:
> Petteri R??ty wrote:
>> Jorge Manuel B. S. Vicetto kirjoitti:
>>> Petteri R??ty wrote:
>>>
>>>
>>> As others have commented, I don't agree with this point. Also, you're
>>> forgetting we have quite a few people working on this project and that we
>>> have many different roles.
>> >
>> And you are assuming that undertakers wouldn't check their role before
>> acting.
>
> I read it as a rule to drop developers. If we're only talking about it
> raising a warning to undertakers so they can check the dev status, then I
> don't have a problem with the proposal.
>
>>> Recalling previous discussions about work on gentoo and some of the
>>> existing roles, what will you do to AT folks, release members or QA
>>> members? Are they also obliged to do a weekly commit to keep their
>>> "privileges"?
>> AT folks aren't devs and see above.
>
> To be clear, I didn't meant arch testers but people that do keywords for
> arch teams.
Actually, 'AT' can refer to either arch teams or Arch Testers, but given
the fact that he was referring to those people with commit access, it
should be obvious he meant 'Arch Teams'.
Thomas
--
gentoo-dev@lists.gentoo.org mailing list