From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from pigeon.gentoo.org ([69.77.167.62] helo=lists.gentoo.org) by finch.gentoo.org with esmtp (Exim 4.60) (envelope-from ) id 1JhOq7-0006nt-Ri for garchives@archives.gentoo.org; Thu, 03 Apr 2008 12:46:48 +0000 Received: from pigeon.gentoo.org (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by pigeon.gentoo.org (Postfix) with SMTP id 1D1EDE0AF3; Thu, 3 Apr 2008 12:46:46 +0000 (UTC) Received: from hu-out-0506.google.com (hu-out-0506.google.com [72.14.214.234]) by pigeon.gentoo.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id C6EC8E0AF3 for ; Thu, 3 Apr 2008 12:46:45 +0000 (UTC) Received: by hu-out-0506.google.com with SMTP id 23so1063971huc.1 for ; Thu, 03 Apr 2008 05:46:45 -0700 (PDT) Received: by 10.78.188.13 with SMTP id l13mr33151556huf.0.1207226800910; Thu, 03 Apr 2008 05:46:40 -0700 (PDT) Received: from snowcone ( [213.121.151.206]) by mx.google.com with ESMTPS id p30sm784497hub.42.2008.04.03.05.46.39 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=OTHER); Thu, 03 Apr 2008 05:46:40 -0700 (PDT) Date: Thu, 3 Apr 2008 13:46:33 +0100 From: Ciaran McCreesh To: gentoo-dev@lists.gentoo.org Subject: Re: [gentoo-dev] Monthly Gentoo Council Reminder for April Message-ID: <20080403134633.04f68a36@snowcone> In-Reply-To: <47F4D13D.8010009@dev.gentooexperimental.org> References: <20080401092610.EEF7467349@smtp.gentoo.org> <47F3F098.1050508@gentoo.org> <47F3F860.6080200@gentoo.org> <47F3FA1C.7010407@gentoo.org> <47F4395A.3000509@gentoo.org> <47F4B9FC.2010907@gentoo.org> <47F4C0F8.7040906@gentoo.org> <20080403123921.3fc33a77@snowcone> <47F4C456.6080704@gentoo.org> <47F4C60B.8080605@gentoo.org> <20080403130151.12507f1a@snowcone> <47F4CAEF.2080106@gentoo.org> <20080403132326.19595c4b@snowcone> <47F4CD96.3070409@dev.gentooexperimental.org> <20080403133350.113f5696@snowcone> <47F4D13D.8010009@dev.gentooexperimental.org> X-Mailer: Claws Mail 3.3.1 (GTK+ 2.12.9; x86_64-pc-linux-gnu) Precedence: bulk List-Post: List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Subscribe: List-Id: Gentoo Linux mail X-BeenThere: gentoo-dev@lists.gentoo.org Reply-to: gentoo-dev@lists.gentoo.org Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/signed; boundary="Sig_/Br2lVMD66jp/QWojLSr=lI3"; protocol="application/pgp-signature"; micalg=PGP-SHA1 X-Archives-Salt: c1227a5b-ec2e-40ed-9c1d-0067b5579c5e X-Archives-Hash: a4e6a768a1babec7d334db6df779b060 --Sig_/Br2lVMD66jp/QWojLSr=lI3 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable On Thu, 03 Apr 2008 14:44:45 +0200 Patrick Lauer wrote: > and then, from that design space, select the option(s) that have the=20 > best behaviour. If you get bored you can read the not-yet-GLEPs > robbat2 has written with the help of a few others, which would cut > out a large part of the discussion: > http://viewcvs.gentoo.org/viewcvs.py/gentoo/users/robbat2/tree-signing-gl= eps/ Uh... Which signing system did you think we were discussing when we started talking about signing the tree? > But if you don't trust anyone there is no reason why you would even > try to interact with Gentoo. So at some point you will have to decide > to arbitrarily trust a few entities, be it devs or servers or > cryptographic keys ... Uh huh, which is what my original reply to Mike was all about. We're way ahead of you here... --=20 Ciaran McCreesh --Sig_/Br2lVMD66jp/QWojLSr=lI3 Content-Type: application/pgp-signature; name=signature.asc Content-Disposition: attachment; filename=signature.asc -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v2.0.7 (GNU/Linux) iD8DBQFH9NGr96zL6DUtXhERAmfFAKDdMSbuVe5tuTwYwzvQPhK1ZLhESQCfSTst A96GHkaTc3lNMRxDSC4wmjE= =77kK -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --Sig_/Br2lVMD66jp/QWojLSr=lI3-- -- gentoo-dev@lists.gentoo.org mailing list