From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from pigeon.gentoo.org ([69.77.167.62] helo=lists.gentoo.org) by finch.gentoo.org with esmtp (Exim 4.60) (envelope-from ) id 1JhNn6-0007iH-Pu for garchives@archives.gentoo.org; Thu, 03 Apr 2008 11:39:37 +0000 Received: from pigeon.gentoo.org (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by pigeon.gentoo.org (Postfix) with SMTP id E0449E0A01; Thu, 3 Apr 2008 11:39:34 +0000 (UTC) Received: from hu-out-0506.google.com (hu-out-0506.google.com [72.14.214.228]) by pigeon.gentoo.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 935CCE0A01 for ; Thu, 3 Apr 2008 11:39:34 +0000 (UTC) Received: by hu-out-0506.google.com with SMTP id 23so1050093huc.1 for ; Thu, 03 Apr 2008 04:39:33 -0700 (PDT) Received: by 10.78.68.18 with SMTP id q18mr29047582hua.72.1207222770999; Thu, 03 Apr 2008 04:39:30 -0700 (PDT) Received: from snowcone ( [213.121.151.206]) by mx.google.com with ESMTPS id i5sm11682132mue.7.2008.04.03.04.39.29 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=OTHER); Thu, 03 Apr 2008 04:39:30 -0700 (PDT) Date: Thu, 3 Apr 2008 12:39:21 +0100 From: Ciaran McCreesh To: gentoo-dev@lists.gentoo.org Subject: Re: [gentoo-dev] Monthly Gentoo Council Reminder for April Message-ID: <20080403123921.3fc33a77@snowcone> In-Reply-To: <47F4C0F8.7040906@gentoo.org> References: <20080401092610.EEF7467349@smtp.gentoo.org> <47F3F098.1050508@gentoo.org> <47F3F860.6080200@gentoo.org> <47F3FA1C.7010407@gentoo.org> <47F4395A.3000509@gentoo.org> <47F4B9FC.2010907@gentoo.org> <47F4C0F8.7040906@gentoo.org> X-Mailer: Claws Mail 3.3.1 (GTK+ 2.12.9; x86_64-pc-linux-gnu) Precedence: bulk List-Post: List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Subscribe: List-Id: Gentoo Linux mail X-BeenThere: gentoo-dev@lists.gentoo.org Reply-to: gentoo-dev@lists.gentoo.org Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/signed; boundary="Sig_/mGmkYqBd7xKGbHXTSSbltRj"; protocol="application/pgp-signature"; micalg=PGP-SHA1 X-Archives-Salt: 720927cc-def4-437e-a49e-b8643f2ac668 X-Archives-Hash: 73bc3722f2dbf63b7397e980834a9b02 --Sig_/mGmkYqBd7xKGbHXTSSbltRj Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable On Thu, 03 Apr 2008 11:35:20 +0000 "Jorge Manuel B. S. Vicetto" wrote: > True, but with some acls we could also have a different model where=20 > people worked on parts of the tree and where commit privileges didn't=20 > pose so many security risks. With the current practice of doing work > in overlays it would also be simpler to merge the work back into the=20 > Portage tree. How does only being able to commit to only part of a tree make commit access any less of a security risk? --=20 Ciaran McCreesh --Sig_/mGmkYqBd7xKGbHXTSSbltRj Content-Type: application/pgp-signature; name=signature.asc Content-Disposition: attachment; filename=signature.asc -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v2.0.7 (GNU/Linux) iD8DBQFH9MHt96zL6DUtXhERAgaSAKDECMa21mJzHwjW6MsQdWG9d9TlTgCdFZ/M AhnX+0oUgvRW5hXMWgtclQ4= =LYWW -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --Sig_/mGmkYqBd7xKGbHXTSSbltRj-- -- gentoo-dev@lists.gentoo.org mailing list