From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from pigeon.gentoo.org ([69.77.167.62] helo=lists.gentoo.org) by finch.gentoo.org with esmtp (Exim 4.60) (envelope-from ) id 1JgMo5-0004Mu-Tb for garchives@archives.gentoo.org; Mon, 31 Mar 2008 16:24:26 +0000 Received: from pigeon.gentoo.org (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by pigeon.gentoo.org (Postfix) with SMTP id 3DC61E03A9; Mon, 31 Mar 2008 16:24:24 +0000 (UTC) Received: from mo-p07-ob.rzone.de (mo-p07-ob.rzone.de [81.169.146.188]) by pigeon.gentoo.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id EA5C7E03A9 for ; Mon, 31 Mar 2008 16:24:23 +0000 (UTC) X-RZG-CLASS-ID: mo07 X-RZG-AUTH: hXn+rC1arvT7Lf9I/zKDqjrgIkrokD1Qxy5bIqfbp9I10BMNL35Kum+fVbT8+ijLtsxBuXUFA00= Received: from localhost (u-4-186.vpn.RWTH-Aachen.DE [137.226.100.186]) by post.webmailer.de (fruni mo2) (RZmta 16.15) with ESMTP id Z00502k2VDwbjt for ; Mon, 31 Mar 2008 18:24:22 +0200 (MEST) (envelope-from: ) Date: Mon, 31 Mar 2008 18:24:09 +0200 From: Christian Faulhammer To: gentoo-dev@lists.gentoo.org Subject: [gentoo-dev] Re: [gentoo-commits] gentoo-x86 commit in app-editors/leafpad: ChangeLog leafpad-0.8.14.ebuild Message-ID: <20080331182409.2205d06e@gentoo.org> In-Reply-To: <200803311125.39669.vapier@gentoo.org> References: <200803301323.05512.vapier@gentoo.org> <47F08420.70705@gentoo.org> <200803311125.39669.vapier@gentoo.org> X-Mailer: Claws Mail 3.3.1 (GTK+ 2.12.8; i686-pc-linux-gnu) Precedence: bulk List-Post: List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Subscribe: List-Id: Gentoo Linux mail X-BeenThere: gentoo-dev@lists.gentoo.org Reply-to: gentoo-dev@lists.gentoo.org Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/signed; boundary="Sig_/i42cyJKo3=tKH7zx1ZnzlSV"; protocol="application/pgp-signature"; micalg=PGP-SHA1 X-Archives-Salt: 78773a77-5bee-4e40-9888-97dc4dc554ca X-Archives-Hash: 8341e7ee3a63eef1d8604e15b7c38360 --Sig_/i42cyJKo3=tKH7zx1ZnzlSV Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Hi, Mike Frysinger : > > Seeing as this is an editor and a "GTK+ based simple text editor" I > > doubt it has much claim to emacs-ness. >=20 > why does this matter ? if an application includes optional support > for an "emacs skin" such that it includes emacs > bindings/shortcuts/whatever, it sounds to me like USE=3Demacs is > appropriate. ive seen random applications that have different > keybinding modes have the default set, and then optional vi or emacs > to select from so that things behave as such users would expect. -mike =20 We have USE=3Dxemacs and emacs...and the key bindings for above editor will switch to something that is also compatible with XEmacs. So why shouldn't one choose USE=3Dxemacs here? We, XEmacs and GNU Emacs team, understand "our" USE flags as integration with said editors not something to mimick their behaviour. V-Li --=20 Christian Faulhammer, Gentoo Lisp project , #gentoo-lisp on FreeNode --Sig_/i42cyJKo3=tKH7zx1ZnzlSV Content-Type: application/pgp-signature; name=signature.asc Content-Disposition: attachment; filename=signature.asc -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v2.0.7 (GNU/Linux) iD8DBQFH8RAuNQqtfCuFneMRAktYAJ9p69eSZfTxlY6JoAE8BZUpEqqXYACbBzVX LmbnhuFODintyiYeJs41um4= =Ap+R -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --Sig_/i42cyJKo3=tKH7zx1ZnzlSV-- -- gentoo-dev@lists.gentoo.org mailing list