From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from pigeon.gentoo.org ([69.77.167.62] helo=lists.gentoo.org) by finch.gentoo.org with esmtp (Exim 4.60) (envelope-from ) id 1JeFS5-0001W5-UC for garchives@archives.gentoo.org; Tue, 25 Mar 2008 20:08:58 +0000 Received: from pigeon.gentoo.org (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by pigeon.gentoo.org (Postfix) with SMTP id 88E9CE0948; Tue, 25 Mar 2008 20:08:17 +0000 (UTC) Received: from mo-p07-ob.rzone.de (mo-p07-ob.rzone.de [81.169.146.189]) by pigeon.gentoo.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 21386E0948 for ; Tue, 25 Mar 2008 20:08:17 +0000 (UTC) X-RZG-CLASS-ID: mo07 X-RZG-AUTH: hXn+rC1arvT7Lf9I/zKDqjrgIkrokD1Qxy5bIqfbp9I10BMNL35Kum+fVbT8+ijLtsxChhtWfg== Received: from localhost (u-7-065.vpn.RWTH-Aachen.DE [137.226.103.65]) by post.webmailer.de (fruni mo51) (RZmta 16.15) with ESMTP id a0004fk2PIWi1h for ; Tue, 25 Mar 2008 21:08:15 +0100 (MET) (envelope-from: ) Date: Tue, 25 Mar 2008 21:08:13 +0100 From: Christian Faulhammer To: gentoo-dev@lists.gentoo.org Subject: [gentoo-dev] Re: bzr.eclass into Portage Message-ID: <20080325210813.52368ad5@gentoo.org> In-Reply-To: <47E917EF.9080402@necoro.eu> References: <20080317193133.525ba4ab@gentoo.org> <47DF0EB6.8010300@gentoo.org> <47E0994D.20705@gentoo.org> <20080320083853.65c20275@gentoo.org> <47E32FDE.60805@gentoo.org> <20080321124913.00d96832@gentoo.org> <47E85542.5090101@necoro.eu> <47E917EF.9080402@necoro.eu> X-Mailer: Claws Mail 3.3.1 (GTK+ 2.12.8; i686-pc-linux-gnu) Precedence: bulk List-Post: List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Subscribe: List-Id: Gentoo Linux mail X-BeenThere: gentoo-dev@lists.gentoo.org Reply-to: gentoo-dev@lists.gentoo.org Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/signed; boundary="Sig_/qBsR5IU.EmDk1UTxXvz+gpM"; protocol="application/pgp-signature"; micalg=PGP-SHA1 X-Archives-Salt: 55a971d2-fad6-494e-8167-248d88d5e7fb X-Archives-Hash: d1369c412c54010c3e83459328cdfb86 --Sig_/qBsR5IU.EmDk1UTxXvz+gpM Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Hi, Ren=E9 'Necoro' Neumann : > I guess this fix will make it into bzr-1.4. Should the eclass then > depend on this version or should it still not allow the lp:-scheme? This eclass is still experimental...but I am all for raising the version requirement and allow as much features as possible. Let's wait for 1.4 then. V-Li --=20 Christian Faulhammer, Gentoo Lisp project , #gentoo-lisp on FreeNode --Sig_/qBsR5IU.EmDk1UTxXvz+gpM Content-Type: application/pgp-signature; name=signature.asc Content-Disposition: attachment; filename=signature.asc -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v2.0.7 (GNU/Linux) iD4DBQFH6VutNQqtfCuFneMRAqF8AJj4uJDNVT5rRpyuq63KV7Z+/keeAJ9OMc9U FvOx6qeabgivllWRq5p0GQ== =K15/ -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --Sig_/qBsR5IU.EmDk1UTxXvz+gpM-- -- gentoo-dev@lists.gentoo.org mailing list