From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from pigeon.gentoo.org ([69.77.167.62] helo=lists.gentoo.org) by finch.gentoo.org with esmtp (Exim 4.60) (envelope-from <gentoo-dev+bounces-30053-garchives=archives.gentoo.org@lists.gentoo.org>) id 1Je4ah-0002Sb-WD for garchives@archives.gentoo.org; Tue, 25 Mar 2008 08:33:08 +0000 Received: from pigeon.gentoo.org (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by pigeon.gentoo.org (Postfix) with SMTP id 94A22E077C; Tue, 25 Mar 2008 08:33:06 +0000 (UTC) Received: from mail.marples.name (rsm.demon.co.uk [80.177.111.50]) by pigeon.gentoo.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 5E092E077C for <gentoo-dev@lists.gentoo.org>; Tue, 25 Mar 2008 08:33:06 +0000 (UTC) Received: from uberpc.marples.name (uberpc.marples.name [10.73.1.30]) (using TLSv1 with cipher DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by mail.marples.name (Postfix) with ESMTP id E20DF19006C; Tue, 25 Mar 2008 08:33:04 +0000 (GMT) From: Roy Marples <roy@marples.name> To: Mike Frysinger <vapier@gentoo.org> Subject: Re: [gentoo-dev] OpenRC & baselayout-2 meets Gentoo Date: Tue, 25 Mar 2008 08:33:04 +0000 User-Agent: KMail/1.9.7 Cc: gentoo-dev@lists.gentoo.org, Doug Goldstein <cardoe@gentoo.org> References: <47E1F3C4.5060907@gentoo.org> <47E822BE.3000808@gentoo.org> <200803241803.49762.vapier@gentoo.org> In-Reply-To: <200803241803.49762.vapier@gentoo.org> Precedence: bulk List-Post: <mailto:gentoo-dev@lists.gentoo.org> List-Help: <mailto:gentoo-dev+help@lists.gentoo.org> List-Unsubscribe: <mailto:gentoo-dev+unsubscribe@lists.gentoo.org> List-Subscribe: <mailto:gentoo-dev+subscribe@lists.gentoo.org> List-Id: Gentoo Linux mail <gentoo-dev.gentoo.org> X-BeenThere: gentoo-dev@lists.gentoo.org Reply-to: gentoo-dev@lists.gentoo.org MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Content-Disposition: inline Message-Id: <200803250833.04335.roy@marples.name> X-Archives-Salt: 41c13e55-cf21-48a1-96f9-d16f9eb99f79 X-Archives-Hash: b398682de4b0857ee72b830d0086e2ab On Monday 24 March 2008 22:03:48 Mike Frysinger wrote: > we're going to need to extend the syntax anyways to allow for > per-version-per-module arguments. unless openrc does that now ... Roy ? It now supports per module per kernel version arguments. Thanks Roy -- gentoo-dev@lists.gentoo.org mailing list