From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
Received: from pigeon.gentoo.org ([69.77.167.62] helo=lists.gentoo.org)
	by finch.gentoo.org with esmtp (Exim 4.60)
	(envelope-from <gentoo-dev+bounces-30053-garchives=archives.gentoo.org@lists.gentoo.org>)
	id 1Je4ah-0002Sb-WD
	for garchives@archives.gentoo.org; Tue, 25 Mar 2008 08:33:08 +0000
Received: from pigeon.gentoo.org (localhost [127.0.0.1])
	by pigeon.gentoo.org (Postfix) with SMTP id 94A22E077C;
	Tue, 25 Mar 2008 08:33:06 +0000 (UTC)
Received: from mail.marples.name (rsm.demon.co.uk [80.177.111.50])
	by pigeon.gentoo.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 5E092E077C
	for <gentoo-dev@lists.gentoo.org>; Tue, 25 Mar 2008 08:33:06 +0000 (UTC)
Received: from uberpc.marples.name (uberpc.marples.name [10.73.1.30])
	(using TLSv1 with cipher DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits))
	(No client certificate requested)
	by mail.marples.name (Postfix) with ESMTP id E20DF19006C;
	Tue, 25 Mar 2008 08:33:04 +0000 (GMT)
From: Roy Marples <roy@marples.name>
To: Mike Frysinger <vapier@gentoo.org>
Subject: Re: [gentoo-dev] OpenRC & baselayout-2 meets Gentoo
Date: Tue, 25 Mar 2008 08:33:04 +0000
User-Agent: KMail/1.9.7
Cc: gentoo-dev@lists.gentoo.org,
 Doug Goldstein <cardoe@gentoo.org>
References: <47E1F3C4.5060907@gentoo.org> <47E822BE.3000808@gentoo.org> <200803241803.49762.vapier@gentoo.org>
In-Reply-To: <200803241803.49762.vapier@gentoo.org>
Precedence: bulk
List-Post: <mailto:gentoo-dev@lists.gentoo.org>
List-Help: <mailto:gentoo-dev+help@lists.gentoo.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <mailto:gentoo-dev+unsubscribe@lists.gentoo.org>
List-Subscribe: <mailto:gentoo-dev+subscribe@lists.gentoo.org>
List-Id: Gentoo Linux mail <gentoo-dev.gentoo.org>
X-BeenThere: gentoo-dev@lists.gentoo.org
Reply-to: gentoo-dev@lists.gentoo.org
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain;
  charset="utf-8"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Content-Disposition: inline
Message-Id: <200803250833.04335.roy@marples.name>
X-Archives-Salt: 41c13e55-cf21-48a1-96f9-d16f9eb99f79
X-Archives-Hash: b398682de4b0857ee72b830d0086e2ab

On Monday 24 March 2008 22:03:48 Mike Frysinger wrote:
> we're going to need to extend the syntax anyways to allow for
> per-version-per-module arguments.  unless openrc does that now ... Roy ?

It now supports per module per kernel version arguments.

Thanks

Roy
-- 
gentoo-dev@lists.gentoo.org mailing list