From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from pigeon.gentoo.org ([69.77.167.62] helo=lists.gentoo.org) by finch.gentoo.org with esmtp (Exim 4.60) (envelope-from ) id 1JduBd-0000XQ-58 for garchives@archives.gentoo.org; Mon, 24 Mar 2008 21:26:33 +0000 Received: from pigeon.gentoo.org (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by pigeon.gentoo.org (Postfix) with SMTP id 5E253E04D2; Mon, 24 Mar 2008 21:26:31 +0000 (UTC) Received: from smtp.gentoo.org (smtp.gentoo.org [140.211.166.183]) by pigeon.gentoo.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 06DFEE051B; Mon, 24 Mar 2008 21:05:28 +0000 (UTC) Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by smtp.gentoo.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id B714D66766; Mon, 24 Mar 2008 21:05:26 +0000 (UTC) From: Mike Frysinger Organization: wh0rd.org To: gentoo-core@lists.gentoo.org Subject: Re: [gentoo-core] Re: [gentoo-dev] OpenRC & baselayout-2 meets Gentoo Date: Mon, 24 Mar 2008 17:08:00 -0400 User-Agent: KMail/1.9.7 Cc: Doug Goldstein , gentoo-dev@lists.gentoo.org References: <47E1F3C4.5060907@gentoo.org> <47E80E92.5060704@gentoo.org> In-Reply-To: <47E80E92.5060704@gentoo.org> Precedence: bulk List-Post: List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Subscribe: List-Id: Gentoo Linux mail X-BeenThere: gentoo-dev@lists.gentoo.org Reply-to: gentoo-dev@lists.gentoo.org MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/signed; boundary="nextPart2085336.EATTZRn6EG"; protocol="application/pgp-signature"; micalg=pgp-sha1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Message-Id: <200803241708.01550.vapier@gentoo.org> X-Archives-Salt: 00b1d33d-3eec-4888-b9f8-f05d54c98dfc X-Archives-Hash: 6520a58404467274bf280af534949c8b --nextPart2085336.EATTZRn6EG Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Content-Disposition: inline On Monday 24 March 2008, Doug Goldstein wrote: > Doug Goldstein wrote: > > All, > > > > This is a formal notice to everyone that OpenRC will be hitting the > > Gentoo tree sooner rather then later. I would like to see *ALL* arch > > teams give the current code a whirl on their systems, which is > > available via the layman module "openrc". > > > > I would also like to give the docs team a chance to weigh in here and > > work with me on a migration guide as well as any necessary updates. > > > > That being said, I will be the primary point of contact on the > > transition to OpenRC appearing in ~arch (along with it's associated > > baselayout-2.0.0 ebuild). Any and all grievances, concerns, > > suggestions and comments can and should be routed to me via the > > associated Bugzilla entries or e-mail. > > > > I do not want OpenRC to come as a surprise to anyone and break their > > system. I expect we will leave no stone unturned and go for a very > > smooth transition. > > > > That being said, the bug for the addition of OpenRC is #212696 [1]. > > The bug for the documentation is #213988 [2]. > > > > Lastly, I will be out of town March 21st through March 23rd. I will > > not have IRC access but I will have e-mail and Bugzilla access. > > > > https://bugs.gentoo.org/show_bug.cgi?id=3D212696 > > https://bugs.gentoo.org/show_bug.cgi?id=3D213988 > > It appears my migration plan was not good enough for Mike Frysinger > and he went ahead and wrote his own version of the > OpenRC ebuild, differing from the one in the OpenRC layman repo, and > committed it to the tree this weekend. > > Since my offer to work on the migration was not good enough for him, I'm > backing out and allowing him to handle the whole migration himself since > I haven't heard from him at all despite Roy (author of OpenRC) and my > attempts to contact him for 2 weeks regarding a migration plan for > OpenRC. All issues and comments can be directed to him. > > I guess working together and documenting everything before having it hit > the tree was a bad plan and it had to be one-upped. not sure why you're getting pissy. but let's put some things straight shal= l=20 we. =2D the ebuild in question was from the layman repo. i changed things of c= ourse=20 because it didnt cover all upgrade pieces, had obvious style problems, and= =20 did some things wrongly. =2D i'd been poking openrc on my system long before "this weekend". =2D only pinging people on irc does not constitute real effort. we have e-= mail=20 addresses too last i checked. =2D the package is still p.masked and de-keyworded. nothing precludes you = from=20 working on it. or writing docs. or doing anything else you're talking abo= ut=20 doing. =2D and no, i dont have a problem sticking masked/de-keyworded things in th= e=20 tree. people test things then. =2Dmike --nextPart2085336.EATTZRn6EG Content-Type: application/pgp-signature; name=signature.asc Content-Description: This is a digitally signed message part. -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v2.0.7 (GNU/Linux) iQIVAwUAR+gYMUFjO5/oN/WBAQI2bw/6A+FsA6gxqix3hu9xnp1qZWjlpSVE0Sy7 nAYenU7SwHgMHgnUCFMouS5GBGS0ZE5Df5i0hk6x/F/QgrKmyP4zNN+/zw9nlktA 1jyn8v3xKpDRbaporz7qpODT6tKbv/E+bChghDYByS8SpMTcMdLvk3ICt4+6nxEE HvZYeAgfuiONaKCMm64dBhMlgoCPb3zN2t4cOiCJQ/z7kPJhCnTD/ZJpV4h50zL3 LEIog/upIkzFm1HIswhl3wwKfjWixQ9ap4M+KhbAlBFdmoMyO0MeyZyLtdUbIGMT 3oOxFyoUBlnOodfMtqT1Ev3d1oux9eO8k1yuhgJd4Q0JmqZZhn1rXysJTcMPyg3S kZ4PMrxABDz9U+EHacarkS3NHpaP69/0tTmRhh7WRXCO4jV2ftvthopN2jRAUUsH px2BAioMe7/v62mhuMybGvMrYp7qaAAxKPxWsz5/fBBxhUH55q1pUmVdr5++jJRG W3wI5fmdzLQE904ktyK4a1j+lBKPJZ3HUxYCkdxWJYNg/EjR1MK0Kimkmo3H28kK XqcwtX7AK9zkykuuFgwdTHLATaSnBNWkuXxstyMlAXqZeLMbQXBaBcB+bDhEls+v krTFgjrPOX+t9az4Y3Oc54McB2YeKBX2hov5/rcZhlyJA6pJrOoOa6mN2I7TKbH3 ikA68KWToIk= =BW+O -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --nextPart2085336.EATTZRn6EG-- -- gentoo-dev@lists.gentoo.org mailing list