From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from pigeon.gentoo.org ([69.77.167.62] helo=lists.gentoo.org) by finch.gentoo.org with esmtp (Exim 4.60) (envelope-from ) id 1Jba0q-0006ft-KL for garchives@archives.gentoo.org; Tue, 18 Mar 2008 11:29:48 +0000 Received: from pigeon.gentoo.org (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by pigeon.gentoo.org (Postfix) with SMTP id CACABE0330; Tue, 18 Mar 2008 11:29:46 +0000 (UTC) Received: from mail.goodpoint.de (tori.goodpoint.de [85.10.203.41]) by pigeon.gentoo.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 9CBE8E0330 for ; Tue, 18 Mar 2008 11:29:46 +0000 (UTC) Received: from [127.0.0.1] (localhost [127.0.0.1]) (using TLSv1 with cipher DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) (Authenticated sender: rbu) by mail.goodpoint.de (Postfix) with ESMTP id 1050A11C001; Tue, 18 Mar 2008 12:29:46 +0100 (CET) From: Robert Buchholz To: gentoo-dev@lists.gentoo.org Subject: Re: [gentoo-dev] [RFC] Bugzilla enhancements wrt AT work Date: Tue, 18 Mar 2008 12:30:04 +0100 User-Agent: KMail/1.9.7 Cc: "Robin H. Johnson" References: <200803151737.37065.scel@xdap.org> <20080318064658.GC24412@curie-int.orbis-terrarum.net> In-Reply-To: <20080318064658.GC24412@curie-int.orbis-terrarum.net> Precedence: bulk List-Post: List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Subscribe: List-Id: Gentoo Linux mail X-BeenThere: gentoo-dev@lists.gentoo.org Reply-to: gentoo-dev@lists.gentoo.org MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/signed; boundary="nextPart5512215.HyklUXmAnN"; protocol="application/pgp-signature"; micalg=pgp-sha1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Message-Id: <200803181230.04751.rbu@gentoo.org> X-Archives-Salt: d07a111e-be3d-4d71-aea0-7ace98a976bb X-Archives-Hash: fbb939c691718a2e06fa34693a04485f --nextPart5512215.HyklUXmAnN Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-2" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Content-Disposition: inline On Tuesday 18 March 2008, Robin H. Johnson wrote: > As the Bugzilla admin, this sounds reasonable, and it plays into some > of my plans wrt to Bugzilla3. In that, depending on some bits with > Bugzie3, I'd like to consider a radical re-arrangement of Products > and Components, to help users find the right place to file stuff, and > also reduce some of the needless complexity that we have. > > As a short-list quickly on products: > - Demote the 'Bugzilla' product down to a component under the > 'Infrastructure' product. > - Demote 'Mirrors' to a component under 'Infrastructure'. > - Promote the components under 'Gentoo Hosted Projects' to Products > of their own, to enable them to have their own components (I can see > several of them benefiting from this). > - Merge the Admin product to the Infrastructure product. Can you add deleting the "Security" component in the "Gentoo Linux"=20 product to that list? Thanks, Robert --nextPart5512215.HyklUXmAnN Content-Type: application/pgp-signature; name=signature.asc Content-Description: This is a digitally signed message part. -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v2.0.7 (GNU/Linux) iD8DBQBH36e8yZx3L/ph1soRAh/uAKDK2QIThJH/Vnu53ocdJsC5PXObUQCgowhp f79uIkUgje0TiMUN6CCDnYU= =d/Mq -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --nextPart5512215.HyklUXmAnN-- -- gentoo-dev@lists.gentoo.org mailing list