From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from pigeon.gentoo.org ([69.77.167.62] helo=lists.gentoo.org) by finch.gentoo.org with esmtp (Exim 4.60) (envelope-from ) id 1JabBF-0002in-0v for garchives@archives.gentoo.org; Sat, 15 Mar 2008 18:32:29 +0000 Received: from pigeon.gentoo.org (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by pigeon.gentoo.org (Postfix) with SMTP id E4787E0887; Sat, 15 Mar 2008 18:32:19 +0000 (UTC) Received: from fg-out-1718.google.com (fg-out-1718.google.com [72.14.220.152]) by pigeon.gentoo.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 742BEE0887 for ; Sat, 15 Mar 2008 18:32:19 +0000 (UTC) Received: by fg-out-1718.google.com with SMTP id 13so1000031fge.14 for ; Sat, 15 Mar 2008 11:32:18 -0700 (PDT) Received: by 10.82.124.10 with SMTP id w10mr3320823buc.18.1205605938320; Sat, 15 Mar 2008 11:32:18 -0700 (PDT) Received: from localhost ( [88.65.189.113]) by mx.google.com with ESMTPS id f19sm8777366fka.18.2008.03.15.11.32.16 (version=SSLv3 cipher=OTHER); Sat, 15 Mar 2008 11:32:17 -0700 (PDT) From: Torsten Rehn Organization: Gentoo Linux To: gentoo-dev@lists.gentoo.org Subject: Re: [gentoo-dev] [RFC] Bugzilla enhancements wrt AT work Date: Sat, 15 Mar 2008 19:31:37 +0100 User-Agent: KMail/1.9.7 References: <200803151737.37065.scel@xdap.org> <47DC0F4C.9070106@gentoo.org> In-Reply-To: <47DC0F4C.9070106@gentoo.org> Precedence: bulk List-Post: List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Subscribe: List-Id: Gentoo Linux mail X-BeenThere: gentoo-dev@lists.gentoo.org Reply-to: gentoo-dev@lists.gentoo.org MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/signed; boundary="nextPart1346938.U0gOvbXIYW"; protocol="application/pgp-signature"; micalg=pgp-sha1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Message-Id: <200803151932.09658.scel@xdap.org> X-Archives-Salt: 74ad20c9-d04c-43a4-b1bb-0cc1d9a92b6b X-Archives-Hash: eb9e109ae32eb89e5edf0af52ab5ece0 --nextPart1346938.U0gOvbXIYW Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Content-Disposition: inline On Saturday 15 March 2008, R=E9mi Cardona wrote: > Just curious, who would be the default assignee for those 2 new component= s? I don't think anything should be changed here. Unpriviledged users=20 automatically assign to bug-wranglers, everyone else goes for the target=20 packages' maintainer. Do you see any problem with this? =2D-=20 Torsten Rehn Gentoo AMD64 Arch Tester http://scel.info --nextPart1346938.U0gOvbXIYW Content-Type: application/pgp-signature; name=signature.asc Content-Description: This is a digitally signed message part. -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v2.0.7 (GNU/Linux) iD8DBQBH3BYp8FB4Hn35qf0RArqzAKCAsnbaz/RuJKFT/0LxfJWRk+HkHACeKuS8 psq0zkm5f4SoW84BLF9RmDE= =dUZW -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --nextPart1346938.U0gOvbXIYW-- -- gentoo-dev@lists.gentoo.org mailing list