From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from pigeon.gentoo.org ([69.77.167.62] helo=lists.gentoo.org) by finch.gentoo.org with esmtp (Exim 4.60) (envelope-from ) id 1JaZZo-0008Qv-0w for garchives@archives.gentoo.org; Sat, 15 Mar 2008 16:49:44 +0000 Received: from pigeon.gentoo.org (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by pigeon.gentoo.org (Postfix) with SMTP id 04E11E07CB; Sat, 15 Mar 2008 16:49:42 +0000 (UTC) Received: from smtp1-g19.free.fr (smtp1-g19.free.fr [212.27.42.27]) by pigeon.gentoo.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id D493DE07CB for ; Sat, 15 Mar 2008 16:49:41 +0000 (UTC) Received: from smtp1-g19.free.fr (localhost.localdomain [127.0.0.1]) by smtp1-g19.free.fr (Postfix) with ESMTP id 35E221AB2D1 for ; Sat, 15 Mar 2008 17:49:41 +0100 (CET) Received: from toz.strangled.net (toz.strangled.net [82.232.126.136]) by smtp1-g19.free.fr (Postfix) with ESMTP id 0AC061AB2BD for ; Sat, 15 Mar 2008 17:49:40 +0100 (CET) Date: Sat, 15 Mar 2008 17:49:42 +0100 From: Alexis Ballier To: gentoo-dev@lists.gentoo.org Subject: Re: [gentoo-dev] [RFC] net-libs/xulrunner-1.9 slotting or not? Message-ID: <20080315174942.715be0dd@toz.strangled.net> In-Reply-To: <47DBF558.7030705@gentoo.org> References: <47DBF558.7030705@gentoo.org> Organization: Gentoo X-Mailer: Claws Mail 3.3.1 (GTK+ 2.12.8; x86_64-pc-linux-gnu) Precedence: bulk List-Post: List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Subscribe: List-Id: Gentoo Linux mail X-BeenThere: gentoo-dev@lists.gentoo.org Reply-to: gentoo-dev@lists.gentoo.org Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/signed; boundary="Sig_/CBtWyA1qaSoSaCHE8fKa=vA"; protocol="application/pgp-signature"; micalg=PGP-SHA1 X-Archives-Salt: 8692bd53-215c-483d-b936-443fb0af29f5 X-Archives-Hash: e60545d18c918c14ef73fb4d241c4add --Sig_/CBtWyA1qaSoSaCHE8fKa=vA Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Hi, > Since the pkgconfig files for xulrunner-1.9 are renamed to avoid > collisions with current xulrunner-1.8. In general I dont think that is a good idea to do that as you said we'll have to patch all the rev deps of xulrunner. More importantly we'll have to carry on those patches forever because we're doing non "standard" things. > The other approach would be not slotting it, p.mask xulrunner-1.9 and=20 > wait until all the packages work against it and then unmask. I don't know how hard it would be but I think that's the best option. Alexis. --Sig_/CBtWyA1qaSoSaCHE8fKa=vA Content-Type: application/pgp-signature; name=signature.asc Content-Disposition: attachment; filename=signature.asc -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v2.0.7 (GNU/Linux) iD8DBQFH2/4mvFcC4BYPU0oRArlrAJ48vqEHd26A3k3k50d+3lFc5+w64gCgrXl1 Cuv0a08fed1XIw54XgbxDCw= =32BC -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --Sig_/CBtWyA1qaSoSaCHE8fKa=vA-- -- gentoo-dev@lists.gentoo.org mailing list