From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from pigeon.gentoo.org ([69.77.167.62] helo=lists.gentoo.org) by finch.gentoo.org with esmtp (Exim 4.60) (envelope-from ) id 1Ja8zs-0006bj-Ae for garchives@archives.gentoo.org; Fri, 14 Mar 2008 12:26:52 +0000 Received: from pigeon.gentoo.org (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by pigeon.gentoo.org (Postfix) with SMTP id 82AB2E05FA; Fri, 14 Mar 2008 12:26:50 +0000 (UTC) Received: from nf-out-0910.google.com (nf-out-0910.google.com [64.233.182.185]) by pigeon.gentoo.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 389AAE05FA for ; Fri, 14 Mar 2008 12:26:50 +0000 (UTC) Received: by nf-out-0910.google.com with SMTP id f5so1508479nfh.26 for ; Fri, 14 Mar 2008 05:26:49 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=googlemail.com; s=gamma; h=domainkey-signature:received:received:from:to:subject:date:user-agent:references:in-reply-to:mime-version:content-type:content-transfer-encoding:content-disposition:message-id; bh=zLgM/bsej/EHAuzwvRQSLHo1Ci/XavS4S+eTDTulA4c=; b=XD5OYUf0TGQe06yNjRH4FFTYDZQ1apMNiWD2b90RKlJ7UxAYnGn2oeWCjZfQ8btF18+TgCGCE1Iz79uIZm0ARRqeYcOuZ6lcW1OQdd0rVQ+5iWXtJ7hd+mPYIhpCsdnxYTWzvQCpoUyabiZUAq8iqaHpos5x+U86eKryYzwJPNo= DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws; d=googlemail.com; s=gamma; h=from:to:subject:date:user-agent:references:in-reply-to:mime-version:content-type:content-transfer-encoding:content-disposition:message-id; b=Uv2BXNvmoYwyZIwgT5y4Ka1k/Jd63MBLbxysrnhpEr3oLxBI9bkyyikOKtSg7UsDhuY5ZuAk0pkIh72RPgPNNnHJYtyqHjpxR+weX10FheLVG3h5j0cQGL5mW9CSgdFMzgpOx8sK/+3qwjlwTxKg2zldPBWPsVhCr9YIjQ3x6zk= Received: by 10.78.183.8 with SMTP id g8mr30488558huf.39.1205497608811; Fri, 14 Mar 2008 05:26:48 -0700 (PDT) Received: from ?192.168.1.67? ( [81.158.99.119]) by mx.google.com with ESMTPS id 11sm6817205hug.15.2008.03.14.05.26.45 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=OTHER); Fri, 14 Mar 2008 05:26:47 -0700 (PDT) From: David Leverton To: gentoo-dev@lists.gentoo.org Subject: Re: [gentoo-dev] [RFC] Major changes to the Gnome2 Eclasses Date: Fri, 14 Mar 2008 12:26:42 +0000 User-Agent: KMail/1.9.7 References: <47DA25CF.10205@gentoo.org> <200803141152.29281.levertond@googlemail.com> <47DA6C2F.2040403@gentoo.org> In-Reply-To: <47DA6C2F.2040403@gentoo.org> Precedence: bulk List-Post: List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Subscribe: List-Id: Gentoo Linux mail X-BeenThere: gentoo-dev@lists.gentoo.org Reply-to: gentoo-dev@lists.gentoo.org MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Content-Disposition: inline Message-Id: <200803141226.42842.levertond@googlemail.com> X-Archives-Salt: 70453483-d0f6-4bcc-8b0a-61874292b2f2 X-Archives-Hash: 504c81c4cd22f1a5b3491162a5770c86 On Friday 14 March 2008 12:14:39 Petteri R=C3=A4ty wrote: > David Leverton kirjoitti: > > Maybe worth adding a dummy to the current version of the eclass so that > > ebuilds can be updated now, instead of suddenly all at once as soon as > > the new eclass is committed? > > And break a bunch of ebuilds to stable users. No thanks. Hmm? I don't see how this would break anything... unless you mean that=20 exporting the dummy function would overwrite one that actually does somethi= ng=20 important, but that's easily worked around by not exporting it until the=20 ebuilds are fixed, as far as I can tell. In any case, not doing anything=20 until the new eclass is committed is going to break ebuilds until they're=20 updated to call the new function, whether stable or ~arch. -- gentoo-dev@lists.gentoo.org mailing list