From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from pigeon.gentoo.org ([69.77.167.62] helo=lists.gentoo.org) by finch.gentoo.org with esmtp (Exim 4.60) (envelope-from ) id 1JXhfG-0000DO-Sn for garchives@archives.gentoo.org; Fri, 07 Mar 2008 18:51:31 +0000 Received: from pigeon.gentoo.org (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by pigeon.gentoo.org (Postfix) with SMTP id 3A839E06AD; Fri, 7 Mar 2008 18:51:27 +0000 (UTC) Received: from mail.genone.homeip.net (dslb-082-083-013-074.pools.arcor-ip.net [82.83.13.74]) by pigeon.gentoo.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 0AA48E06AD for ; Fri, 7 Mar 2008 18:51:27 +0000 (UTC) Received: by mail.genone.homeip.net (Postfix, from userid 460) id C779D28207; Fri, 7 Mar 2008 19:49:54 +0100 (CET) X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.1.8-gr0-genone_0.7 (2007-02-13) on lyta.genone.homeip.net X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-4.4 required=7.0 tests=ALL_TRUSTED,BAYES_00 autolearn=ham version=3.1.8-gr0-genone_0.7 Received: from sheridan (sheridan [192.168.0.40]) by mail.genone.homeip.net (Postfix) with SMTP id 3B0B728205 for ; Fri, 7 Mar 2008 19:49:53 +0100 (CET) Date: Fri, 7 Mar 2008 19:48:52 +0100 From: Marius Mauch To: gentoo-dev@lists.gentoo.org Subject: Re: [gentoo-dev] Monthly Gentoo Council Reminder for March Message-Id: <20080307194852.f6550af2.genone@gentoo.org> In-Reply-To: <20080306090209.6d2de54f@gentoo.org> References: <20080301103002.A2AE266A22@smtp.gentoo.org> <20080306090209.6d2de54f@gentoo.org> X-Mailer: Sylpheed 2.4.8 (GTK+ 2.10.14; i686-pc-mingw32) Precedence: bulk List-Post: List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Subscribe: List-Id: Gentoo Linux mail X-BeenThere: gentoo-dev@lists.gentoo.org Reply-to: gentoo-dev@lists.gentoo.org Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable X-Archives-Salt: f66fa221-0cd1-4bc8-a62e-ae0616d8a75e X-Archives-Hash: c01c125bdc768dfb682ad5131d11094f On Thu, 6 Mar 2008 09:02:09 +0000 S=E9bastien Fabbro wrote: > We have contacted some talented ebuild submitters who neither want to > spend the time nor feel the responsibility of a full dev. Maybe we should try to solve that problem instead of making our hierarchy even more complex. What exact time constraints and responsibilities are people afraid of? Are those concerns real or just myths? > A formal proxy-maintainer could really help in our sometimes blind > maintaining duties. What would be the difference between a "formal proxy-maintainer" and how we handle it currently? Marius -- gentoo-dev@lists.gentoo.org mailing list