From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from pigeon.gentoo.org ([69.77.167.62] helo=lists.gentoo.org) by finch.gentoo.org with esmtp (Exim 4.60) (envelope-from ) id 1JWxiL-0000Nd-VB for garchives@archives.gentoo.org; Wed, 05 Mar 2008 17:47:38 +0000 Received: from pigeon.gentoo.org (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by pigeon.gentoo.org (Postfix) with SMTP id 66D12E07DB; Wed, 5 Mar 2008 17:47:36 +0000 (UTC) Received: from mail.genone.homeip.net (dslb-082-083-043-117.pools.arcor-ip.net [82.83.43.117]) by pigeon.gentoo.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 31598E07DB for ; Wed, 5 Mar 2008 17:47:36 +0000 (UTC) Received: by mail.genone.homeip.net (Postfix, from userid 460) id CBB60281F3; Wed, 5 Mar 2008 18:45:26 +0100 (CET) X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.1.8-gr0-genone_0.7 (2007-02-13) on lyta.genone.homeip.net X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-4.4 required=7.0 tests=ALL_TRUSTED,BAYES_00 autolearn=ham version=3.1.8-gr0-genone_0.7 Received: from sheridan (sheridan [192.168.0.40]) by mail.genone.homeip.net (Postfix) with SMTP id 39C1728203 for ; Wed, 5 Mar 2008 18:45:25 +0100 (CET) Date: Wed, 5 Mar 2008 18:45:31 +0100 From: Marius Mauch To: gentoo-dev@lists.gentoo.org Subject: Re: [gentoo-dev] Monthly Gentoo Council Reminder for March Message-Id: <20080305184531.952d9550.genone@gentoo.org> In-Reply-To: References: <20080301103002.A2AE266A22@smtp.gentoo.org> X-Mailer: Sylpheed 2.4.8 (GTK+ 2.10.14; i686-pc-mingw32) Precedence: bulk List-Post: List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Subscribe: List-Id: Gentoo Linux mail X-BeenThere: gentoo-dev@lists.gentoo.org Reply-to: gentoo-dev@lists.gentoo.org Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Archives-Salt: 91d90f29-6020-4b46-8495-174bbbe4ecab X-Archives-Hash: 01ca8fb8fb57704fdfa316997cf1d5d9 On Wed, 5 Mar 2008 22:41:58 +0530 Anant Narayanan wrote: > Hi, > > > If you have something you'd wish for us to chat about, maybe even > > vote on, let us know ! Simply reply to this e-mail for the whole > > Gentoo dev list to see. > > If it's not too late for this month's meeting, I'd like to discuss > the possibility of including a new "post" in our developer base - > the package maintainer. > > a) The requirements to become a package maintainer for Gentoo may be > lesser than that of the full-fledged developer. Please elaborate on how a "full.fledged developer" would differ from a "package maintainer" technically. What requirements and/or priviledges do you think could be reduced? Marius -- gentoo-dev@lists.gentoo.org mailing list