From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970
Received: from pigeon.gentoo.org ([69.77.167.62] helo=lists.gentoo.org)
by finch.gentoo.org with esmtp (Exim 4.60)
(envelope-from <gentoo-dev+bounces-29714-garchives=archives.gentoo.org@lists.gentoo.org>)
id 1JWy7o-0003dM-Il
for garchives@archives.gentoo.org; Wed, 05 Mar 2008 18:13:56 +0000
Received: from pigeon.gentoo.org (localhost [127.0.0.1])
by pigeon.gentoo.org (Postfix) with SMTP id 5B96FE064C;
Wed, 5 Mar 2008 18:13:12 +0000 (UTC)
Received: from wx-out-0506.google.com (wx-out-0506.google.com [66.249.82.237])
by pigeon.gentoo.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 35DEFE064C
for <gentoo-dev@lists.gentoo.org>; Wed, 5 Mar 2008 18:13:12 +0000 (UTC)
Received: by wx-out-0506.google.com with SMTP id h30so2171264wxd.10
for <gentoo-dev@lists.gentoo.org>; Wed, 05 Mar 2008 10:13:12 -0800 (PST)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed;
d=gmail.com; s=gamma;
h=domainkey-signature:received:received:from:to:subject:date:user-agent:references:in-reply-to:mime-version:content-type:content-transfer-encoding:message-id;
bh=zG88UvliikjG/xBjD4NxLzIyU9qeslHw9Wa0wSF/dyQ=;
b=bqnU2vH9I57fpFUocCHNhq9VAvpKIL/RtHjTbca9mF9X1lyE44aIOtGN17L3e9KkyrS+3Pz842iT5T8JkF5ax/MH3iwGL2FhTpRc4i+IfwLEFJExxIh1Lrv9cT1vTJ9/7fHbWhPuHfz17JZwWZejKcfErPsDA2Ps30r61nG+Qqs=
DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws;
d=gmail.com; s=gamma;
h=from:to:subject:date:user-agent:references:in-reply-to:mime-version:content-type:content-transfer-encoding:message-id;
b=iQg5UgeUiwTNkauXKyN7h8Ic+ABYHqj50EBFQhmuIz1X+h7hlNjc44qkSnlA8ViGj9vtYsSADfJztaExjeYVl/+tV2AcCiqSZqzRmNYvSzXiCS64YSkzhbNpzUnqgesmC8LVCzuEv2gyq/MshDSx0pmOjpwPFSl27FbmCzdrO7c=
Received: by 10.65.15.19 with SMTP id s19mr6984694qbi.79.1204740790014;
Wed, 05 Mar 2008 10:13:10 -0800 (PST)
Received: from emachine.mpa.com ( [66.19.241.87])
by mx.google.com with ESMTPS id d2sm1201291qbc.36.2008.03.05.10.13.07
(version=SSLv3 cipher=OTHER);
Wed, 05 Mar 2008 10:13:09 -0800 (PST)
From: Thomas Anderson <gentoofan23@gmail.com>
To: gentoo-dev@lists.gentoo.org
Subject: Re: [gentoo-dev] Monthly Gentoo Council Reminder for March
Date: Wed, 5 Mar 2008 13:24:09 -0500
User-Agent: KMail/1.9.7
References: <20080301103002.A2AE266A22@smtp.gentoo.org> <FE6D272E-113E-449C-8AC6-7A1D57E9F543@gentoo.org> <20080305184531.952d9550.genone@gentoo.org>
In-Reply-To: <20080305184531.952d9550.genone@gentoo.org>
Precedence: bulk
List-Post: <mailto:gentoo-dev@lists.gentoo.org>
List-Help: <mailto:gentoo-dev+help@lists.gentoo.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <mailto:gentoo-dev+unsubscribe@lists.gentoo.org>
List-Subscribe: <mailto:gentoo-dev+subscribe@lists.gentoo.org>
List-Id: Gentoo Linux mail <gentoo-dev.gentoo.org>
X-BeenThere: gentoo-dev@lists.gentoo.org
Reply-to: gentoo-dev@lists.gentoo.org
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: multipart/signed;
boundary="nextPart66935895.OM0vcU5fAe";
protocol="application/pgp-signature";
micalg=pgp-sha1
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Message-Id: <200803051324.12812.gentoofan23@gmail.com>
X-Archives-Salt: 7a95af76-85ab-48c8-beed-d5ddf2e5b10f
X-Archives-Hash: d380de1cf1a334fc6306bda673e5a191
--nextPart66935895.OM0vcU5fAe
Content-Type: text/plain;
charset="iso-8859-1"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
Content-Disposition: inline
On Wednesday 05 March 2008 12:45:31 Marius Mauch wrote:
> On Wed, 5 Mar 2008 22:41:58 +0530
>
> Anant Narayanan <anant@gentoo.org> wrote:
> > Hi,
> >
> > > If you have something you'd wish for us to chat about, maybe even
> > > vote on, let us know ! Simply reply to this e-mail for the whole
> > > Gentoo dev list to see.
> >
> > If it's not too late for this month's meeting, I'd like to discuss
> > the possibility of including a new "post" in our developer base -
> > the package maintainer.
> >
> > a) The requirements to become a package maintainer for Gentoo may be
> > lesser than that of the full-fledged developer.
>
> Please elaborate on how a "full.fledged developer" would differ from a
> "package maintainer" technically. What requirements and/or
> priviledges do you think could be reduced?
>
> Marius
Perhaps there could be some honor code system at least, where the package=20
maintainer would be restricted to their area of maintainership.=20
but +1 from me, I'd be very interested in the position, considering I alrea=
dy=20
proxy maintain a package.
--nextPart66935895.OM0vcU5fAe
Content-Type: application/pgp-signature; name=signature.asc
Content-Description: This is a digitally signed message part.
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v2.0.7 (GNU/Linux)
iD8DBQBHzuVMF6yMcaBxwHkRAigkAJ91WY+WGV2xQa38NQGk2Qmu6TS+0wCfeXJ5
qekugAdur3m33Os+bFU5W7k=
=nwpt
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----
--nextPart66935895.OM0vcU5fAe--
--
gentoo-dev@lists.gentoo.org mailing list