From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from pigeon.gentoo.org ([69.77.167.62] helo=lists.gentoo.org) by finch.gentoo.org with esmtp (Exim 4.60) (envelope-from ) id 1JVWgf-0002ez-4X for garchives@archives.gentoo.org; Sat, 01 Mar 2008 18:43:57 +0000 Received: from pigeon.gentoo.org (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by pigeon.gentoo.org (Postfix) with SMTP id 2685BE01B9; Sat, 1 Mar 2008 18:43:55 +0000 (UTC) Received: from mo-p07-ob.rzone.de (mo-p07-ob.rzone.de [81.169.146.189]) by pigeon.gentoo.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id D2A4EE01B9 for ; Sat, 1 Mar 2008 18:43:54 +0000 (UTC) X-RZG-CLASS-ID: mo07 X-RZG-AUTH: hXn+rC1arvT7Lf9I/zKDqjrgIkrokD1Qxy5bIqfbp9I10BMNL35Kum+fVbT8+ijLtsxAGXA++hc= Received: from localhost (u-5-248.vpn.RWTH-Aachen.DE [137.226.101.248]) by post.webmailer.de (klopstock mo22) (RZmta 16.8) with ESMTP id R03f64k21H4nk6 for ; Sat, 1 Mar 2008 19:43:53 +0100 (MET) (envelope-from: ) Date: Sat, 1 Mar 2008 19:45:55 +0100 From: Christian Faulhammer To: gentoo-dev@lists.gentoo.org Subject: [gentoo-dev] Re: Monthly Gentoo Council Reminder for March Message-ID: <20080301194555.29ecad7c@gentoo.org> In-Reply-To: <47C99A1B.7020009@gentoo.org> References: <20080301103002.A2AE266A22@smtp.gentoo.org> <47C9360A.9080806@gentoo.org> <200803011429.39223.welp@gentoo.org> <47C96B1F.9000805@gentoo.org> <47C99A1B.7020009@gentoo.org> X-Mailer: Claws Mail 3.3.1 (GTK+ 2.12.5; i686-pc-linux-gnu) Precedence: bulk List-Post: List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Subscribe: List-Id: Gentoo Linux mail X-BeenThere: gentoo-dev@lists.gentoo.org Reply-to: gentoo-dev@lists.gentoo.org Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/signed; boundary="Sig_/oNrmzgBMJ_VVU_MW0JrkJg="; protocol="application/pgp-signature"; micalg=PGP-SHA1 X-Archives-Salt: 52f9a0eb-136f-487e-800a-e5a177321764 X-Archives-Hash: 10488b058956eee152c5025d86222f3f --Sig_/oNrmzgBMJ_VVU_MW0JrkJg= Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Hi, Richard Freeman : > > Hope you're not referring to any of my arches because that's not > > true :) In fact, if i did that, i wouldn't crash the alpha dev box > > so often, right Tobias? > I dunno - I just hit bug 211021 today while trying to clean out old > bugs. Already stable on one arch and not a word from the maintainer. As I was the one ccing arches, I should explain here...humpback has not reacted on tor bugs for a long time, not even security ones. So I did bumps and minor fixes for some time now, including stabilisation requests. My only failure here was, that I did not add myself to metadata.xml. My policy is to ask for stabilisation --> no reaction for one week (if it is urgent), I call arches. > While amd64 is a lot more mainstream than it used to be you can't just > assume that upstream wouldn't have released something if it didn't > work perfectly on amd64. Here you are right, and I must admit I sometimes only compile-test. I test everything I can, for special hardware I ask around in the team, but if there is no one I have no other choice. =20 > No disputing that there is a problem - we just want to be careful that > the solution isn't worse than the problem... What we propose is proper testing and keywording by anyone around...not just team members. V-Li --=20 Christian Faulhammer, Gentoo Lisp project , #gentoo-lisp on FreeNode --Sig_/oNrmzgBMJ_VVU_MW0JrkJg= Content-Type: application/pgp-signature; name=signature.asc Content-Disposition: attachment; filename=signature.asc -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v2.0.7 (GNU/Linux) iD8DBQFHyaRjNQqtfCuFneMRAubsAKCIf+JROnQWD5llubaYQUHP7f4+DwCeIg9l bUmzIo4xFnnwgLrdhdfrDRo= =qjH0 -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --Sig_/oNrmzgBMJ_VVU_MW0JrkJg=-- -- gentoo-dev@lists.gentoo.org mailing list