From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from pigeon.gentoo.org ([69.77.167.62] helo=lists.gentoo.org) by finch.gentoo.org with esmtp (Exim 4.60) (envelope-from ) id 1JV8hc-0007lI-JP for garchives@archives.gentoo.org; Fri, 29 Feb 2008 17:07:20 +0000 Received: from pigeon.gentoo.org (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by pigeon.gentoo.org (Postfix) with SMTP id 33F89E0804; Fri, 29 Feb 2008 17:07:19 +0000 (UTC) Received: from mail.marples.name (rsm.demon.co.uk [80.177.111.50]) by pigeon.gentoo.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id DA798E0804 for ; Fri, 29 Feb 2008 17:07:18 +0000 (UTC) Received: from uberpc.marples.name (uberpc.marples.name [10.73.1.30]) (using TLSv1 with cipher DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by mail.marples.name (Postfix) with ESMTP id 3B89A190087 for ; Fri, 29 Feb 2008 17:07:18 +0000 (GMT) From: Roy Marples To: gentoo-dev@lists.gentoo.org Subject: Re: [gentoo-dev] Baselayout-2 progress? Date: Fri, 29 Feb 2008 17:07:17 +0000 User-Agent: KMail/1.9.7 References: <47C812CF.2020903@wildgooses.com> <47C82C9F.7040701@gentoo.org> <47C82FB7.9030308@wildgooses.com> In-Reply-To: <47C82FB7.9030308@wildgooses.com> Precedence: bulk List-Post: List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Subscribe: List-Id: Gentoo Linux mail X-BeenThere: gentoo-dev@lists.gentoo.org Reply-to: gentoo-dev@lists.gentoo.org MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Content-Disposition: inline Message-Id: <200802291707.17936.roy@marples.name> X-Archives-Salt: 06b97d9f-fe72-4237-87dc-14e787964920 X-Archives-Hash: c478bc9e218383fa7f6bf330dd059c63 On Friday 29 February 2008 16:15:51 Ed W wrote: > On the other hand since there still isn't a masked ebuild in portage > (and I seem some notes on my on Roy's site) then I have to assume that > in fact we are still a good way away from calling it a replacement and > starting to push it out to users? It's actually been very stable and usable for a long time. It's not, and never will be a 100% drop in replacement for everything baselayout provides, but it's very very compatible. > Would it not make sense to start to snapshot some builds and push openrc > out for testing? (Seems like a gentoo job rather than an upstream is > the reason I ask here?) As Doug mentioned earlier, my git repo is available in an ebuild. Why haven't I done a snapshot or release yet? Well, I have one last feature to add basically. That feature is so it can be installed "prefixed" and still work perfectly - with the exception of not booting or shutting down the host system. I'll be doing this on my NetBSD box next week hopefully. But bugs are still being found and fixed - although at a slow rate :) Thanks Roy -- gentoo-dev@lists.gentoo.org mailing list