From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970
Received: from pigeon.gentoo.org ([69.77.167.62] helo=lists.gentoo.org)
by finch.gentoo.org with esmtp (Exim 4.60)
(envelope-from <gentoo-dev+bounces-29625-garchives=archives.gentoo.org@lists.gentoo.org>)
id 1JV9pD-0005WN-HS
for garchives@archives.gentoo.org; Fri, 29 Feb 2008 18:19:15 +0000
Received: from pigeon.gentoo.org (localhost [127.0.0.1])
by pigeon.gentoo.org (Postfix) with SMTP id E079BE0111;
Fri, 29 Feb 2008 18:19:13 +0000 (UTC)
Received: from wr-out-0506.google.com (wr-out-0506.google.com [64.233.184.225])
by pigeon.gentoo.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id A46A6E0111
for <gentoo-dev@lists.gentoo.org>; Fri, 29 Feb 2008 18:19:13 +0000 (UTC)
Received: by wr-out-0506.google.com with SMTP id 50so5040274wri.10
for <gentoo-dev@lists.gentoo.org>; Fri, 29 Feb 2008 10:19:13 -0800 (PST)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed;
d=gmail.com; s=gamma;
h=domainkey-signature:received:received:from:to:subject:date:user-agent:references:in-reply-to:mime-version:content-type:content-transfer-encoding:message-id;
bh=4JQ+BHyWF2CZbhtctO8f67ex898HnHjdc0CTgqV14Qs=;
b=a6Dh+YxqtZxZuusQjuuYCK87N0Rg2o0BFNU09+t3nmGz5e7I/3hbFNWYtJNbB7ozQFei2HKzGPWOmaELG2BEr5duYRsR3tfiPfwTtlW1WF/YMrV41WmvWw8DhS8vrmVpA2eesLwVJQnyJbewdItEvkpg7JTgbwl13wLyYnkl7oY=
DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws;
d=gmail.com; s=gamma;
h=from:to:subject:date:user-agent:references:in-reply-to:mime-version:content-type:content-transfer-encoding:message-id;
b=KuniQbSjtZo+DUI1wgQ9hZT+R9vvYQKd8X/SZKfbf4Ahduw3iQ6ogVb81A2BCKxNHu/8B0hk4CvIgjjRWWIbHD426KMWZCevZBF497GtDr9U9pHG7RbFndInQA+JVACmNNQyCaj8VJBDIYYeuvmeE4hc4YnMxaCVha7YC2zAfGE=
Received: by 10.64.180.20 with SMTP id c20mr13899532qbf.42.1204309151882;
Fri, 29 Feb 2008 10:19:11 -0800 (PST)
Received: from emachine.mpa.com ( [66.19.242.150])
by mx.google.com with ESMTPS id e13sm9280534qba.37.2008.02.29.10.19.09
(version=SSLv3 cipher=OTHER);
Fri, 29 Feb 2008 10:19:11 -0800 (PST)
From: Thomas Anderson <gentoofan23@gmail.com>
To: gentoo-dev@lists.gentoo.org
Subject: Re: [gentoo-dev] Keyword request interface (SoC candidate?)
Date: Fri, 29 Feb 2008 13:29:59 -0500
User-Agent: KMail/1.9.7
References: <3c32af40802280933n1290c88bn35b2b989de29ce1b@mail.gmail.com> <47C7E848.5080009@gentoo.org> <47C84B3C.3080505@gentoo.org>
In-Reply-To: <47C84B3C.3080505@gentoo.org>
Precedence: bulk
List-Post: <mailto:gentoo-dev@lists.gentoo.org>
List-Help: <mailto:gentoo-dev+help@lists.gentoo.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <mailto:gentoo-dev+unsubscribe@lists.gentoo.org>
List-Subscribe: <mailto:gentoo-dev+subscribe@lists.gentoo.org>
List-Id: Gentoo Linux mail <gentoo-dev.gentoo.org>
X-BeenThere: gentoo-dev@lists.gentoo.org
Reply-to: gentoo-dev@lists.gentoo.org
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: multipart/signed;
boundary="nextPart1993350.vONrWgzmvc";
protocol="application/pgp-signature";
micalg=pgp-sha1
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Message-Id: <200802291330.04021.gentoofan23@gmail.com>
X-Archives-Salt: 11d5a24d-ddd8-4af4-bde8-7083d5eec36f
X-Archives-Hash: 7c0c5c93cec66f88adcac681134a68ff
--nextPart1993350.vONrWgzmvc
Content-Type: text/plain;
charset="utf-8"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
Content-Disposition: inline
On Friday 29 February 2008 13:13:16 Richard Freeman wrote:
> R=C3=A9mi Cardona wrote:
> > +1 on that idea, using bugzilla with an external tool for keyword
> > requests is a good idea.
> >
> > The tool could do bugzilla research to see if the keyword has already
> > been requested and point the user to the corresponding bug report,
> > hopefully limiting the number of dupes.
>
> ++
>
> It would still be nice to have better status tracking in bugzilla - some
> way for ATs to officially mark that stuff is tested in a way that can be
> easily queried (so that ATs can find stuff that isn't tested, and devs
> can find stuff that has been). The issue about hard-to-test packages is
> really a separate one, but one that could use a solution...
Definitely. I find it very annoying searching through bugzilla looking for=
=20
things that other Arch Testers haven't tested. On the other hand, after a=20
while you start to remember which bugs haven't been tested(at least if you=
=20
are on an arch with >150 bugs). Barring that case, such a system would be=20
very nice.
--nextPart1993350.vONrWgzmvc
Content-Type: application/pgp-signature; name=signature.asc
Content-Description: This is a digitally signed message part.
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v2.0.7 (GNU/Linux)
iD8DBQBHyE8sF6yMcaBxwHkRAtyOAJ9KkhoIu4mRpUUZoBIq6fR4/5RBrwCeJf0S
TTZ6QlkOfFS+H9bq2TRHk+8=
=8o0j
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----
--nextPart1993350.vONrWgzmvc--
--
gentoo-dev@lists.gentoo.org mailing list