* [gentoo-dev] The app-misc/beagle in portage is seriously outdated! @ 2008-02-28 2:27 Shaochun Wang 2008-02-28 7:17 ` Rémi Cardona 2008-02-28 10:30 ` Alistair Bush 0 siblings, 2 replies; 15+ messages in thread From: Shaochun Wang @ 2008-02-28 2:27 UTC (permalink / raw To: gentoo dev Hi all: The app-misc/beagle is portage is seriously outdated! I remember that the developer of this beagle ebuild posted a mail saying that he/she had no time to maintain this package and looked for new maintainer. After such a long time, nothing happened to the beagle ebuild. How to change this situation? Is the original maintainer is still active now? BTW, besides the beagle bump request in the bugzilla of Gentoo, is there any way to let us normal users get beagle up to date? -- Shaochun Wang <scwang@ios.ac.cn> Jabber: fungusw@jabber.org -- gentoo-dev@lists.gentoo.org mailing list ^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 15+ messages in thread
* Re: [gentoo-dev] The app-misc/beagle in portage is seriously outdated! 2008-02-28 2:27 [gentoo-dev] The app-misc/beagle in portage is seriously outdated! Shaochun Wang @ 2008-02-28 7:17 ` Rémi Cardona 2008-02-28 8:26 ` Shaochun Wang 2008-02-28 10:30 ` Alistair Bush 1 sibling, 1 reply; 15+ messages in thread From: Rémi Cardona @ 2008-02-28 7:17 UTC (permalink / raw To: gentoo dev Shaochun Wang a écrit : > After such a long time, nothing happened to the beagle ebuild. How to > change this situation? Is the original maintainer is still active now? > > BTW, besides the beagle bump request in the bugzilla of Gentoo, is there > any way to let us normal users get beagle up to date? Create your own overlay and put the ebuild there, maybe try to have it in Sunrise, maybe Daniel could proxy-maintain the ebuild for you, should you prove to know enough both about ebuilds and beagle :) Cheers, Rémi -- gentoo-dev@lists.gentoo.org mailing list ^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 15+ messages in thread
* Re: [gentoo-dev] The app-misc/beagle in portage is seriously outdated! 2008-02-28 7:17 ` Rémi Cardona @ 2008-02-28 8:26 ` Shaochun Wang 2008-02-28 10:04 ` Gilles Dartiguelongue 0 siblings, 1 reply; 15+ messages in thread From: Shaochun Wang @ 2008-02-28 8:26 UTC (permalink / raw To: gentoo-dev On Thu, Feb 28, 2008 at 08:17:56AM +0100, R茅mi Cardona wrote: > Create your own overlay and put the ebuild there, maybe try to have it in I really created my own overlay on my personal computer. I also commited a beagle ebuild to gentoo bugzilla. > Sunrise, maybe Daniel could proxy-maintain the ebuild for you, should you Proxy-maintain? I think that guy is retired sneakly from Gentoo. What about proxy maintaining? > prove to know enough both about ebuilds and beagle :) BTW, how to prove I have known enough about ebuilds and beagle? Anyway, thank you for your reply! -- Shaochun Wang <scwang@ios.ac.cn> Jabber: fungusw@jabber.org -- gentoo-dev@lists.gentoo.org mailing list ^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 15+ messages in thread
* Re: [gentoo-dev] The app-misc/beagle in portage is seriously outdated! 2008-02-28 8:26 ` Shaochun Wang @ 2008-02-28 10:04 ` Gilles Dartiguelongue 2008-02-28 10:27 ` Cédric Krier 0 siblings, 1 reply; 15+ messages in thread From: Gilles Dartiguelongue @ 2008-02-28 10:04 UTC (permalink / raw To: gentoo-dev Le jeudi 28 février 2008 à 16:26 +0800, Shaochun Wang a écrit : > On Thu, Feb 28, 2008 at 08:17:56AM +0100, Rémi Cardona wrote: > > Create your own overlay and put the ebuild there, maybe try to have it in > I really created my own overlay on my personal computer. I also commited a > beagle ebuild to gentoo bugzilla. > > > Sunrise, maybe Daniel could proxy-maintain the ebuild for you, should you > Proxy-maintain? I think that guy is retired sneakly from Gentoo. What > about proxy maintaining? proxy-maintaining doesn't necessarily rely on the original maintainer. Although it would be best to find someone that actually uses mono to test it :) Btw, shouldn't this package be under the freedesktop/dotnet herd ? > > prove to know enough both about ebuilds and beagle :) > BTW, how to prove I have known enough about ebuilds and beagle? apply to the ebuild quiz :) -- Gilles Dartiguelongue <eva@gentoo.org> Gentoo -- gentoo-dev@lists.gentoo.org mailing list ^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 15+ messages in thread
* Re: [gentoo-dev] The app-misc/beagle in portage is seriously outdated! 2008-02-28 10:04 ` Gilles Dartiguelongue @ 2008-02-28 10:27 ` Cédric Krier 2008-02-28 15:32 ` Daniel Drake 0 siblings, 1 reply; 15+ messages in thread From: Cédric Krier @ 2008-02-28 10:27 UTC (permalink / raw To: gentoo-dev [-- Attachment #1: Type: text/plain, Size: 1077 bytes --] On 28/02/08 11:04 +0100, Gilles Dartiguelongue wrote: > Le jeudi 28 février 2008 à 16:26 +0800, Shaochun Wang a écrit : > > On Thu, Feb 28, 2008 at 08:17:56AM +0100, Rémi Cardona wrote: > > > Create your own overlay and put the ebuild there, maybe try to have it in > > I really created my own overlay on my personal computer. I also commited a > > beagle ebuild to gentoo bugzilla. > > > > > Sunrise, maybe Daniel could proxy-maintain the ebuild for you, should you > > Proxy-maintain? I think that guy is retired sneakly from Gentoo. What > > about proxy maintaining? > > proxy-maintaining doesn't necessarily rely on the original maintainer. > Although it would be best to find someone that actually uses mono to > test it :) > > Btw, shouldn't this package be under the freedesktop/dotnet herd ? > > > > prove to know enough both about ebuilds and beagle :) > > BTW, how to prove I have known enough about ebuilds and beagle? > > apply to the ebuild quiz :) > I can take it if dsd agrees, as I use it but without the gtk interface. [-- Attachment #2: Type: application/pgp-signature, Size: 189 bytes --] ^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 15+ messages in thread
* Re: [gentoo-dev] The app-misc/beagle in portage is seriously outdated! 2008-02-28 10:27 ` Cédric Krier @ 2008-02-28 15:32 ` Daniel Drake 0 siblings, 0 replies; 15+ messages in thread From: Daniel Drake @ 2008-02-28 15:32 UTC (permalink / raw To: cedk; +Cc: gentoo-dev Cédric Krier wrote: > I can take it if dsd agrees, as I use it but without the gtk interface. Please go right ahead. Also I recommend working with Nirbheek Chauhan who would be an ideal candidate for a maintainer/co-maintainer but when I last asked didn't have enough time to go through recruitment. Thanks! Daniel -- gentoo-dev@lists.gentoo.org mailing list ^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 15+ messages in thread
* Re: [gentoo-dev] The app-misc/beagle in portage is seriously outdated! 2008-02-28 2:27 [gentoo-dev] The app-misc/beagle in portage is seriously outdated! Shaochun Wang 2008-02-28 7:17 ` Rémi Cardona @ 2008-02-28 10:30 ` Alistair Bush 2008-02-28 11:17 ` Nirbheek Chauhan 1 sibling, 1 reply; 15+ messages in thread From: Alistair Bush @ 2008-02-28 10:30 UTC (permalink / raw To: gentoo-dev Shaochun Wang wrote: > Hi all: > > BTW, besides the beagle bump request in the bugzilla of Gentoo, is there > any way to let us normal users get beagle up to date? > Im sure that there are more than a few dev that would be willing to proxy maintain the package, if a user is prepared to standup and take responsibility for it. Currently it seems that the package doesn't build for everyone ( by having a quick look at #201093 ) and this is something that any maintainer would have to rectify [1]. If your prepared to do it there are plenty of resources to help you along. Checkout http://devmanual.gentoo.org and jump on irc://freenode/#gentoo-dev-help if you have any ebuild related questions. ali_bush [1] Sometimes I get the impression that users think that as long as a package works for them, that it works. This sadly isn't the case. -- gentoo-dev@lists.gentoo.org mailing list ^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 15+ messages in thread
* Re: [gentoo-dev] The app-misc/beagle in portage is seriously outdated! 2008-02-28 10:30 ` Alistair Bush @ 2008-02-28 11:17 ` Nirbheek Chauhan 2008-02-28 11:33 ` Nirbheek Chauhan 2008-02-28 12:49 ` Shaochun Wang 0 siblings, 2 replies; 15+ messages in thread From: Nirbheek Chauhan @ 2008-02-28 11:17 UTC (permalink / raw To: gentoo-dev On Thu, Feb 28, 2008 at 4:00 PM, Alistair Bush <ali_bush@gentoo.org> wrote: > > BTW, besides the beagle bump request in the bugzilla of Gentoo, is there > > any way to let us normal users get beagle up to date? > > > > Im sure that there are more than a few dev that would be willing to > proxy maintain the package, if a user is prepared to standup and take > responsibility for it. This is entirely my fault. I'm a part of Beagle upstream, and had volunteered to proxy maintain it. I was the one who was supposed to contact Petteri Räty (Betelguese) after he had volunteered to proxy maintain it (via a reply to dsd's email) several weeks ago. However, I ended up getting busy with other things, procrastinating this, and in the end majorly slacking in getting Beagle fixed (though I did update the ebuild on the gentoo bug occasionally) > Currently it seems that the package doesn't > build for everyone ( by having a quick look at #201093 ) and this is > something that any maintainer would have to rectify [1]. Beagle 0.3.3 itself compiles just fine, but yelp and nautilus don't compile with beagle support (beagle USE flag) because libbeagle got split from Beagle in 0.3, it's API changed, and the version number got bumped. Work is in progress to fix yelp with the new libbeagle, but no such progress has been made in nautilus. Probably the "beagle" USE flag in nautilus and yelp has to be made to depend on 0.2.18 since it doesn't work with >=0.3 All in all, I take complete blame for this mess. /me feels majorly guilty > [1] Sometimes I get the impression that users think that as long as a > package works for them, that it works. This sadly isn't the case. -- ~Nirbheek Chauhan -- gentoo-dev@lists.gentoo.org mailing list ^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 15+ messages in thread
* Re: [gentoo-dev] The app-misc/beagle in portage is seriously outdated! 2008-02-28 11:17 ` Nirbheek Chauhan @ 2008-02-28 11:33 ` Nirbheek Chauhan 2008-02-28 12:49 ` Shaochun Wang 1 sibling, 0 replies; 15+ messages in thread From: Nirbheek Chauhan @ 2008-02-28 11:33 UTC (permalink / raw To: gentoo-dev On Thu, Feb 28, 2008 at 4:47 PM, Nirbheek Chauhan <nirbheek.chauhan@gmail.com> wrote: > All in all, I take complete blame for this mess. This also means I'm going to fix it :-) -- ~Nirbheek Chauhan -- gentoo-dev@lists.gentoo.org mailing list ^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 15+ messages in thread
* Re: [gentoo-dev] The app-misc/beagle in portage is seriously outdated! 2008-02-28 11:17 ` Nirbheek Chauhan 2008-02-28 11:33 ` Nirbheek Chauhan @ 2008-02-28 12:49 ` Shaochun Wang 2008-02-28 18:43 ` Nirbheek Chauhan 1 sibling, 1 reply; 15+ messages in thread From: Shaochun Wang @ 2008-02-28 12:49 UTC (permalink / raw To: gentoo-dev On Thu, Feb 28, 2008 at 04:47:08PM +0530, Nirbheek Chauhan wrote: > Beagle 0.3.3 itself compiles just fine, but yelp and nautilus don't > compile with beagle support (beagle USE flag) because libbeagle got > split from Beagle in 0.3, it's API changed, and the version number got > bumped. Work is in progress to fix yelp with the new libbeagle, but no > such progress has been made in nautilus. > Probably the "beagle" USE flag in nautilus and yelp has to be made to > depend on 0.2.18 since it doesn't work with >=0.3 For me, everything including nautilus compiles cleanly with beagle support, but not yelp! -- Shaochun Wang <scwang@ios.ac.cn> Jabber: fungusw@jabber.org -- gentoo-dev@lists.gentoo.org mailing list ^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 15+ messages in thread
* Re: [gentoo-dev] The app-misc/beagle in portage is seriously outdated! 2008-02-28 12:49 ` Shaochun Wang @ 2008-02-28 18:43 ` Nirbheek Chauhan 2008-02-28 19:19 ` [gentoo-dev] RE: Mesa on i965 (DRI) Mateusz Mierzwinski 2008-02-29 0:47 ` [gentoo-dev] The app-misc/beagle in portage is seriously outdated! Shaochun Wang 0 siblings, 2 replies; 15+ messages in thread From: Nirbheek Chauhan @ 2008-02-28 18:43 UTC (permalink / raw To: gentoo-dev On Thu, Feb 28, 2008 at 6:19 PM, Shaochun Wang <scwang@ios.ac.cn> wrote: > On Thu, Feb 28, 2008 at 04:47:08PM +0530, Nirbheek Chauhan wrote: > > Beagle 0.3.3 itself compiles just fine, but yelp and nautilus don't > > compile with beagle support (beagle USE flag) because libbeagle got > > split from Beagle in 0.3, it's API changed, and the version number got > > bumped. Work is in progress to fix yelp with the new libbeagle, but no > > such progress has been made in nautilus. > > Probably the "beagle" USE flag in nautilus and yelp has to be made to > > depend on 0.2.18 since it doesn't work with >=0.3 > > For me, everything including nautilus compiles cleanly with beagle > support, but not yelp! Yeah, nautilus compiles with the new libbeagle, but silently falls back to manual (non-beagle) search when you try searching from within nautilus. -- ~Nirbheek Chauhan -- gentoo-dev@lists.gentoo.org mailing list ^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 15+ messages in thread
* [gentoo-dev] RE: Mesa on i965 (DRI) 2008-02-28 18:43 ` Nirbheek Chauhan @ 2008-02-28 19:19 ` Mateusz Mierzwinski 2008-02-28 19:32 ` Chris Gianelloni 2008-02-29 11:13 ` Rémi Cardona 2008-02-29 0:47 ` [gentoo-dev] The app-misc/beagle in portage is seriously outdated! Shaochun Wang 1 sibling, 2 replies; 15+ messages in thread From: Mateusz Mierzwinski @ 2008-02-28 19:19 UTC (permalink / raw To: gentoo-dev Ok, I've try i810 and... no DRI. I've reemerge from packege last mesa working with DRI and... no DRI because (EE) AIGLX error: dlsym for __driCreateNewScreen_20050727 failed (/usr/lib64/dri/i965_dri.so: undefined symbol: __driCreateNewScreen_20050727) - library incompatible and need recompilation. So i Try to recompile and... (make linux-dri-x86-64 -j3 because oryginal mesa don't provide for me i965_dri.so so www.intellinuxgraphics.org comes with help - downloaded by GIT and compiled with this) ../common/dri_bufmgr.c: In function 'dri_bo_alloc': ../common/dri_bufmgr.c:43: error: 'DRM_BO_FLAG_MEM_PRIV0' undeclared (first use in this function) ../common/dri_bufmgr.c:43: error: (Each undeclared identifier is reported only once ../common/dri_bufmgr.c:43: error: for each function it appears in.) ../common/dri_bufmgr.c:43: error: 'DRM_BO_FLAG_MEM_PRIV1' undeclared (first use in this function) ../common/dri_bufmgr.c:43: error: 'DRM_BO_FLAG_MEM_PRIV2' undeclared (first use in this function) ../common/dri_bufmgr.c:43: error: 'DRM_BO_FLAG_MEM_PRIV3' undeclared (first use in this function) ../common/dri_bufmgr.c:43: error: 'DRM_BO_FLAG_MEM_PRIV4' undeclared (first use in this function) ../common/dri_bufmgr.c:43: error: 'DRM_BO_FLAG_CACHED_MAPPED' undeclared (first use in this function) ../common/dri_bufmgr.c: In function 'dri_bo_alloc_static': ../common/dri_bufmgr.c:56: error: 'DRM_BO_FLAG_MEM_PRIV0' undeclared (first use in this function) ../common/dri_bufmgr.c:56: error: 'DRM_BO_FLAG_MEM_PRIV1' undeclared (first use in this function) ../common/dri_bufmgr.c:56: error: 'DRM_BO_FLAG_MEM_PRIV2' undeclared (first use in this function) ../common/dri_bufmgr.c:56: error: 'DRM_BO_FLAG_MEM_PRIV3' undeclared (first use in this function) ../common/dri_bufmgr.c:56: error: 'DRM_BO_FLAG_MEM_PRIV4' undeclared (first use in this function) make[6]: *** [../common/dri_bufmgr.o] Error 1 make[6]: *** Waiting for unfinished jobs.... make[6]: Leaving directory `/var/tmp/experimental/mesa/src/mesa/drivers/dri/i965' make[5]: *** [subdirs] Error 1 make[5]: Leaving directory `/var/tmp/experimental/mesa/src/mesa/drivers/dri' make[4]: *** [linux-solo] Error 2 make[4]: Leaving directory `/var/tmp/experimental/mesa/src/mesa' make[3]: *** [default] Error 2 make[3]: Leaving directory `/var/tmp/experimental/mesa/src/mesa' make[2]: *** [subdirs] Error 1 make[2]: Leaving directory `/var/tmp/experimental/mesa/src' make[1]: *** [default] Error 1 make[1]: Leaving directory `/var/tmp/experimental/mesa' make: *** [linux-dri-x86-64] Error 2 and that's all folks... Any ideas, because I've haven't any after 3 days of mesa vs i965 war. I allso add xorg compilation flags for more info... [ebuild R ] x11-base/xorg-server-1.4.0.90-r3 USE="dri hal sdl xorg -xprint (-3dfx) -debug -dmx -ipv6 -kdrive -minimal (-nptl)" [ebuild R ] x11-libs/libdrm-2.3.0 USE="-debug" 0 kB -- gentoo-dev@lists.gentoo.org mailing list ^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 15+ messages in thread
* Re: [gentoo-dev] RE: Mesa on i965 (DRI) 2008-02-28 19:19 ` [gentoo-dev] RE: Mesa on i965 (DRI) Mateusz Mierzwinski @ 2008-02-28 19:32 ` Chris Gianelloni 2008-02-29 11:13 ` Rémi Cardona 1 sibling, 0 replies; 15+ messages in thread From: Chris Gianelloni @ 2008-02-28 19:32 UTC (permalink / raw To: gentoo-dev [-- Attachment #1: Type: text/plain, Size: 355 bytes --] On Thu, 2008-02-28 at 20:19 +0100, Mateusz Mierzwinski wrote: > Ok, I've try i810 and... no DRI. Please take this off the general development mailing list and to one of the support lists, or, even better, to our bug tracker at http://bugs.gentoo.org instead. Thanks, -- Chris Gianelloni Release Engineering Strategic Lead Games Developer [-- Attachment #2: This is a digitally signed message part --] [-- Type: application/pgp-signature, Size: 189 bytes --] ^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 15+ messages in thread
* Re: [gentoo-dev] RE: Mesa on i965 (DRI) 2008-02-28 19:19 ` [gentoo-dev] RE: Mesa on i965 (DRI) Mateusz Mierzwinski 2008-02-28 19:32 ` Chris Gianelloni @ 2008-02-29 11:13 ` Rémi Cardona 1 sibling, 0 replies; 15+ messages in thread From: Rémi Cardona @ 2008-02-29 11:13 UTC (permalink / raw To: gentoo-dev You're hijacking threads again. Please stop. If you have an issue, file a bug report at http://bugs.gentoo.org/ The -dev mailing list is the _wrong_ place for that. Thanks -- Rémi Cardona LRI, INRIA remi.cardona@lri.fr remi@gentoo.org -- gentoo-dev@lists.gentoo.org mailing list ^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 15+ messages in thread
* Re: [gentoo-dev] The app-misc/beagle in portage is seriously outdated! 2008-02-28 18:43 ` Nirbheek Chauhan 2008-02-28 19:19 ` [gentoo-dev] RE: Mesa on i965 (DRI) Mateusz Mierzwinski @ 2008-02-29 0:47 ` Shaochun Wang 1 sibling, 0 replies; 15+ messages in thread From: Shaochun Wang @ 2008-02-29 0:47 UTC (permalink / raw To: gentoo-dev On Fri, Feb 29, 2008 at 12:13:30AM +0530, Nirbheek Chauhan wrote: > Yeah, nautilus compiles with the new libbeagle, but silently falls > back to manual (non-beagle) search when you try searching from within > nautilus. Yes, you are right! Nautilus compiles, but doesn't work as expected. -- Shaochun Wang <scwang@ios.ac.cn> Jabber: fungusw@jabber.org -- gentoo-dev@lists.gentoo.org mailing list ^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 15+ messages in thread
end of thread, other threads:[~2008-02-29 23:40 UTC | newest] Thread overview: 15+ messages (download: mbox.gz follow: Atom feed -- links below jump to the message on this page -- 2008-02-28 2:27 [gentoo-dev] The app-misc/beagle in portage is seriously outdated! Shaochun Wang 2008-02-28 7:17 ` Rémi Cardona 2008-02-28 8:26 ` Shaochun Wang 2008-02-28 10:04 ` Gilles Dartiguelongue 2008-02-28 10:27 ` Cédric Krier 2008-02-28 15:32 ` Daniel Drake 2008-02-28 10:30 ` Alistair Bush 2008-02-28 11:17 ` Nirbheek Chauhan 2008-02-28 11:33 ` Nirbheek Chauhan 2008-02-28 12:49 ` Shaochun Wang 2008-02-28 18:43 ` Nirbheek Chauhan 2008-02-28 19:19 ` [gentoo-dev] RE: Mesa on i965 (DRI) Mateusz Mierzwinski 2008-02-28 19:32 ` Chris Gianelloni 2008-02-29 11:13 ` Rémi Cardona 2008-02-29 0:47 ` [gentoo-dev] The app-misc/beagle in portage is seriously outdated! Shaochun Wang
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox