Re: [gentoo-dev] Google SOC 2008

[Roy Marples <roy@marples.name>]

On Wednesday 27 February 2008 14:21:58 Fabian Groffen wrote:
> On 27-02-2008 13:56:51 +0000, Roy Marples wrote:
> > On Wed, 27 Feb 2008 13:29:15 +0100, Fabian Groffen <grobian@gentoo.org>
> >
> > wrote:
> > > Well... that's great!  But a jail or a (ch)root is in general not the
> > > same as a "prefix".
> >
> > No, but it's the same kettle of fish as chroots, jails and vps systems -
> > basically
> > there is a need to disable dependencies that provide what the host
> > already does.
>
> Ok, the host will for instance do "net", so "need net" should indeed not
> fail.  However I could imagine that "need net" would just get satisfied
> or something, like by a dummy.

Correct. lu_zero wanted OpenRC to work out of the box in a vanilla fbsd jail, 
hence the keyword instead of dummy scripts.

> > If OpenRC compiles and /bin/sh points to a POSIX shell it should work as
> > it stands.
>
> Ok, then we already fail here.
> /bin/sh is no way POSIX, it is just bourne, so that's where we come in
> and simply use /usr/bin/env {sh,bash,posix-sh} or a full path to make
> your assumption true.

make SH=/usr/local/bin/bash
now tweaks all the scripts accordingly.

Thanks

Roy
-- 
gentoo-dev@lists.gentoo.org mailing list