From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from pigeon.gentoo.org ([69.77.167.62] helo=lists.gentoo.org) by finch.gentoo.org with esmtp (Exim 4.60) (envelope-from ) id 1JRQsB-0003Zv-8p for garchives@archives.gentoo.org; Tue, 19 Feb 2008 11:42:55 +0000 Received: from pigeon.gentoo.org (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by pigeon.gentoo.org (Postfix) with SMTP id F0439E0952; Tue, 19 Feb 2008 11:41:36 +0000 (UTC) Received: from smtp.ferdyx.org (170.Red-213-96-222.staticIP.rima-tde.net [213.96.222.170]) by pigeon.gentoo.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id A570CE0952 for ; Tue, 19 Feb 2008 11:41:36 +0000 (UTC) Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by smtp.ferdyx.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 71AA18D30C for ; Tue, 19 Feb 2008 12:53:51 +0100 (CET) X-Virus-Scanned: Debian amavisd-new at ferdyx.org Received: from smtp.ferdyx.org ([127.0.0.1]) by localhost (tungsteno.ferdyx.org [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id SEd8kitvnEpc for ; Tue, 19 Feb 2008 12:53:49 +0100 (CET) Received: from snowcone (unknown [213.121.151.206]) (using TLSv1 with cipher DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by smtp.ferdyx.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id EE38D8D307 for ; Tue, 19 Feb 2008 12:53:48 +0100 (CET) Date: Tue, 19 Feb 2008 11:41:28 +0000 From: Ciaran McCreesh To: gentoo-dev@lists.gentoo.org Subject: Re: [gentoo-dev] Re: [gentoo-commits] gentoo-x86 commit in eclass: flag-o-matic.eclass Message-ID: <20080219114128.66269a56@snowcone> In-Reply-To: <47BA1186.8090903@gentoo.org> References: <20080218212052.GC3914@comet.science.oregonstate.edu> <20080218213741.32ddc84f@snowcone> <20080218215434.GD3914@comet.science.oregonstate.edu> <20080218220127.56028c0d@snowcone> <20080218223307.0b2f1e22@snowcone> <47BA1186.8090903@gentoo.org> X-Mailer: Claws Mail 3.2.0 (GTK+ 2.12.7; x86_64-pc-linux-gnu) Precedence: bulk List-Post: List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Subscribe: List-Id: Gentoo Linux mail X-BeenThere: gentoo-dev@lists.gentoo.org Reply-to: gentoo-dev@lists.gentoo.org Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/signed; boundary="Sig_/.a3sRDs9I9n2kAqbfLFQIG+"; protocol="application/pgp-signature"; micalg=PGP-SHA1 X-Archives-Salt: 4e4379bb-2977-4b70-b797-a5c9104373df X-Archives-Hash: b2fd81a67f22c182365545a699800c90 --Sig_/.a3sRDs9I9n2kAqbfLFQIG+ Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable On Mon, 18 Feb 2008 18:15:18 -0500 Doug Klima wrote: > >>> How many people are running a Portage version released after > >>> January 4? > >> Eventually, all of them. > >=20 > > And until then, how many users are going to get things going weirdly > > wrong if workarounds aren't added to everything using the code? > > 6 You think there are 6 people running stable Portage? Either you think all the users (including those installing off old stages) are running ~arch, or you think Gentoo has died, or you think everyone's moved to Paludis... --=20 Ciaran McCreesh --Sig_/.a3sRDs9I9n2kAqbfLFQIG+ Content-Type: application/pgp-signature; name=signature.asc Content-Disposition: attachment; filename=signature.asc -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v2.0.7 (GNU/Linux) iD8DBQFHusBr96zL6DUtXhERAkR6AJ498KwdHDGXSuEvV29HXSwguptTOwCgp/MJ RH+RNukPfFewb6LHmUQpnB4= =1i7a -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --Sig_/.a3sRDs9I9n2kAqbfLFQIG+-- -- gentoo-dev@lists.gentoo.org mailing list