From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from pigeon.gentoo.org ([69.77.167.62] helo=lists.gentoo.org) by finch.gentoo.org with esmtp (Exim 4.60) (envelope-from ) id 1JRDwb-0002LR-RN for garchives@archives.gentoo.org; Mon, 18 Feb 2008 21:54:37 +0000 Received: from pigeon.gentoo.org (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by pigeon.gentoo.org (Postfix) with SMTP id 8FAB6E05AE; Mon, 18 Feb 2008 21:54:36 +0000 (UTC) Received: from smtp.gentoo.org (smtp.gentoo.org [140.211.166.183]) by pigeon.gentoo.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 63134E05AE for ; Mon, 18 Feb 2008 21:54:36 +0000 (UTC) Received: from gentoo.org (xray.science.oregonstate.edu [128.193.220.51]) (using TLSv1 with cipher DHE-RSA-AES128-SHA (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by smtp.gentoo.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id EEC4164BFA for ; Mon, 18 Feb 2008 21:54:35 +0000 (UTC) Date: Mon, 18 Feb 2008 13:54:34 -0800 From: Donnie Berkholz To: gentoo-dev@lists.gentoo.org Subject: Re: [gentoo-dev] Re: [gentoo-commits] gentoo-x86 commit in eclass: flag-o-matic.eclass Message-ID: <20080218215434.GD3914@comet.science.oregonstate.edu> References: <20080218212052.GC3914@comet.science.oregonstate.edu> <20080218213741.32ddc84f@snowcone> Precedence: bulk List-Post: List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Subscribe: List-Id: Gentoo Linux mail X-BeenThere: gentoo-dev@lists.gentoo.org Reply-to: gentoo-dev@lists.gentoo.org MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <20080218213741.32ddc84f@snowcone> User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.16 (2007-06-09) X-Archives-Salt: 53145f2e-c4e2-4fca-8bc8-9dadfa0455cd X-Archives-Hash: 8afe71b99826b6c052e6f36c8e1a3c22 On 21:37 Mon 18 Feb , Ciaran McCreesh wrote: > On Mon, 18 Feb 2008 13:20:52 -0800 > Donnie Berkholz wrote: > > This seems like something ewarn should do on its own. > > http://sources.gentoo.org/viewcvs.py/portage/main/trunk/bin/isolated-functions.sh?r1=9118&r2=9140 Alright, so portage has put this stuff to stderr since January 4. Then why are we also adding workarounds to individual eclasses? > http://sources.gentoo.org/viewcvs.py/gentoo-x86/eclass/flag-o-matic.eclass?rev=1.121&view=markup I'm not sure what I'm supposed to get out of this, besides seeing that a lot of stuff is sent to stderr. > http://thread.gmane.org/gmane.linux.gentoo.user/194929 Right, I figured the reason was something along the lines of info going to stdout when only flags should. -- gentoo-dev@lists.gentoo.org mailing list