From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from pigeon.gentoo.org ([69.77.167.62] helo=lists.gentoo.org) by finch.gentoo.org with esmtp (Exim 4.60) (envelope-from ) id 1JPMyw-0002V0-Cx for garchives@archives.gentoo.org; Wed, 13 Feb 2008 19:09:22 +0000 Received: from pigeon.gentoo.org (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by pigeon.gentoo.org (Postfix) with SMTP id 0B639E05FC; Wed, 13 Feb 2008 19:07:53 +0000 (UTC) Received: from blob.mailstation.de (news.mailstation.de [87.139.47.139]) by pigeon.gentoo.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 4EA17E05FC for ; Wed, 13 Feb 2008 19:07:51 +0000 (UTC) Received: from janus.mailstation.de (janus.mailstation.de [192.168.168.10]) by blob.mailstation.de (8.14.2/8.13.4) with ESMTP id m1DJ72AK013060 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA bits=256 verify=NO) for ; Wed, 13 Feb 2008 20:07:03 +0100 From: "Wulf C. Krueger" To: gentoo-dev@lists.gentoo.org Subject: Re: [gentoo-dev] One-Day Gentoo Council Reminder for February Date: Wed, 13 Feb 2008 20:07:02 +0100 User-Agent: KMail/1.9.7 References: <20080213080033.AC71566068@smtp.gentoo.org> <200802131920.14664.philantrop@gentoo.org> <20080213183437.GE9913@aerie.halcy0n.com> In-Reply-To: <20080213183437.GE9913@aerie.halcy0n.com> Precedence: bulk List-Post: List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Subscribe: List-Id: Gentoo Linux mail X-BeenThere: gentoo-dev@lists.gentoo.org Reply-to: gentoo-dev@lists.gentoo.org MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/signed; boundary="nextPart1584371.mbD6LAahQu"; protocol="application/pgp-signature"; micalg=pgp-sha1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Message-Id: <200802132007.02376.philantrop@gentoo.org> X-Greylist: Sender IP whitelisted, not delayed by milter-greylist-1.6 (blob.mailstation.de [192.168.168.30]); Wed, 13 Feb 2008 20:07:03 +0100 (CET) X-mailstation-de-MailScanner-Information: Scanned using: F-Prot, ClamAv, Bitdefender X-mailstation-de-MailScanner: Found to be clean X-mailstation-de-MailScanner-SpamCheck: not spam, SpamAssassin (not cached, score=-1.44, required 5, autolearn=not spam, ALL_TRUSTED -1.44) X-mailstation-de-MailScanner-From: philantrop@gentoo.org X-mailstation-de-MailScanner-To: gentoo-dev@lists.gentoo.org X-Archives-Salt: c0e28ebf-271d-40a8-ab7a-9a887e54b6c4 X-Archives-Hash: 7c69cf337c70fa3e5be61a209b413ccd --nextPart1584371.mbD6LAahQu Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-15" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Content-Disposition: inline On Wednesday, 13. February 2008 19:34:37 Mark Loeser wrote: > Okay, so I stand corrected about them approving it. Where is the > approved specification though? =20 That's something I asked the council, too, here: http://thread.gmane.org/gmane.linux.gentoo.council/110 I got no response from the council on the list. Thus, I asked during the=20 next council meeting's "open floor" session: http://www.gentoo.org/proj/en/council/meeting-logs/20071213-summary.txt The last paragraph of the summary shows the (non-)result. > PMS is still a draft the last time I heard,=20 Well, considering that the approval refers to PMS, some version of it=20 seems to be authoritative. :-)=20 I just don't know which one (and, as can be seen from the full log of said= =20 meeting, I consider the external PMS repository authoritative until a=20 council decision) and=20 git+ssh://@git.gentoo.org/var/gitroot/pms which was once the "official" copy of the repository doesn't seem to exist= =20 anymore. > and if it isn't, we should have a non-moving version that is=20 > authoritive about EAPI=3D1. (And no, the man pages are not a > specification, nor is a list of bugs...give us one document that we can > point to) Totally agreed. =2D-=20 Best regards, Wulf --nextPart1584371.mbD6LAahQu Content-Type: application/pgp-signature; name=signature.asc Content-Description: This is a digitally signed message part. -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v2.0.7 (GNU/Linux) iD8DBQBHsz/WnuVXRcSi+5oRAqoHAJ4s2K3k7lbaL6tgub4eQpdxZueoawCeNQ1m 8GQIlzFnTliBCt+L3G4UA4w= =9QQ2 -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --nextPart1584371.mbD6LAahQu-- -- gentoo-dev@lists.gentoo.org mailing list