From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from pigeon.gentoo.org ([69.77.167.62] helo=lists.gentoo.org) by finch.gentoo.org with esmtp (Exim 4.60) (envelope-from ) id 1JPHAB-0006IR-4C for garchives@archives.gentoo.org; Wed, 13 Feb 2008 12:56:35 +0000 Received: from pigeon.gentoo.org (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by pigeon.gentoo.org (Postfix) with SMTP id 6A896E062C; Wed, 13 Feb 2008 12:56:33 +0000 (UTC) Received: from mail.genone.homeip.net (dslb-082-083-014-032.pools.arcor-ip.net [82.83.14.32]) by pigeon.gentoo.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 2B014E062C for ; Wed, 13 Feb 2008 12:56:33 +0000 (UTC) Received: by mail.genone.homeip.net (Postfix, from userid 460) id 025B9281E4; Wed, 13 Feb 2008 13:55:33 +0100 (CET) X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.1.8-gr0-genone_0.7 (2007-02-13) on lyta.genone.homeip.net X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-4.4 required=7.0 tests=ALL_TRUSTED,BAYES_00 autolearn=ham version=3.1.8-gr0-genone_0.7 Received: from sheridan (sheridan.genone.homeip.net [192.168.0.40]) by mail.genone.homeip.net (Postfix) with SMTP id 808372817C for ; Wed, 13 Feb 2008 13:55:32 +0100 (CET) Date: Wed, 13 Feb 2008 13:54:50 +0100 From: Marius Mauch To: gentoo-dev@lists.gentoo.org Subject: Re: [gentoo-dev] RFC: adding support for running eautoconf to base.eclass Message-Id: <20080213135450.4d72c827.genone@gentoo.org> In-Reply-To: <47B22F56.905@gentoo.org> References: <47B22F56.905@gentoo.org> X-Mailer: Sylpheed 2.4.1 (GTK+ 2.10.11; i686-pc-mingw32) Precedence: bulk List-Post: List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Subscribe: List-Id: Gentoo Linux mail X-BeenThere: gentoo-dev@lists.gentoo.org Reply-to: gentoo-dev@lists.gentoo.org Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable X-Archives-Salt: 8122faa5-6315-4e33-9117-df5db4c784d2 X-Archives-Hash: b1826e601c06d9d5300be33c1e0879e3 On Wed, 13 Feb 2008 01:44:22 +0200 Petteri R=E4ty wrote: > What do you think about adding support to base.eclass for running=20 > eautoreconf? >=20 > so instead of >=20 > src_unpack() { > unpack ${A} > cd "${A}" > eautoreconf > } >=20 > would just add >=20 > EAUTORECONF=3D"yes" > inherit base How many packages do you think could directly benefit from this? Marius -- gentoo-dev@lists.gentoo.org mailing list