From: Ciaran McCreesh <ciaran.mccreesh@blueyonder.co.uk>
To: gentoo-dev@lists.gentoo.org
Subject: Re: [gentoo-dev] Re: VDB access
Date: Tue, 5 Feb 2008 19:02:24 +0000 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20080205190224.59268128@snowcone> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20080205084355.45ade352@gentoo.org>
[-- Attachment #1: Type: text/plain, Size: 1947 bytes --]
On Tue, 5 Feb 2008 08:43:55 +0100
Christian Faulhammer <opfer@gentoo.org> wrote:
> > This will let package managers use a format other than VDB. A well
> > designed replacement can shave a minute off cold cache command
> > times.
>
> How much gain can be expected?
There're two common operations that're really really slow (because they
need lots of filesystem access) using VDB: turning a pkg into a cat/pkg
and finding all PROVIDEd packages. A redesigned format can, for example,
make the former a single filesystem operation and the latter a single
directory read.
If you're looking for numbers, you can see very roughly how long a VDB
load takes off cold cache using:
echo 2 | sudo dd of=/proc/sys/vm/drop_caches
find /var/db/pkg/ -type f -not -name 'environment.bz2' \
| xargs cat >/dev/null
A different on-disk format could avoid 90% of those filesystem accesses
for many operations.
There's a more subtle issue with VDB and the scope of locking required
by multithreaded implementations. This one's not an issue for
interpreted languages, but it's a minor nuisance in places where
there's no language-induced locking.
> And what package managers will allow native_built_with_use?
I doubt Portage will, since if someone's going to make changes to
Portage that'd let it use something other than VDB, they've clearly got
enough time to implement use deps as a side project, which would make
built_with_use obsolete. Paludis would certainly implement it -- we've
already got a redesigned on-disk db format that we use for tracking
unpackaged packages, and repurposing that to handle ebuilds wouldn't be
very hard.
Incidentally, if anyone is still thinking that built_with_use is
fine... It doesn't handle IUSE defaults, which means package managers
have to store a hacked version of IUSE in VDB for EAPI 1. This isn't
documented anywhere and is highly unobvious.
--
Ciaran McCreesh
[-- Attachment #2: signature.asc --]
[-- Type: application/pgp-signature, Size: 189 bytes --]
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2008-02-05 19:02 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 14+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2008-02-05 1:05 [gentoo-dev] VDB access Ciaran McCreesh
2008-02-05 7:43 ` [gentoo-dev] " Christian Faulhammer
2008-02-05 19:02 ` Ciaran McCreesh [this message]
2008-02-06 6:43 ` Petteri Räty
2008-02-06 17:09 ` Ciaran McCreesh
2008-02-05 21:21 ` [gentoo-dev] " Zac Medico
2008-02-06 6:30 ` Vlastimil Babka
2008-02-06 7:49 ` Zac Medico
2008-02-06 13:24 ` Michael Haubenwallner
2008-02-06 18:16 ` Ciaran McCreesh
2008-02-06 17:14 ` Ciaran McCreesh
2008-02-07 7:41 ` Zac Medico
2008-02-08 9:54 ` Ciaran McCreesh
2008-04-10 8:07 ` Rémi Cardona
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20080205190224.59268128@snowcone \
--to=ciaran.mccreesh@blueyonder.co.uk \
--cc=gentoo-dev@lists.gentoo.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox