From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from pigeon.gentoo.org ([69.77.167.62] helo=lists.gentoo.org) by finch.gentoo.org with esmtp (Exim 4.60) (envelope-from ) id 1JMHn3-0005kR-DW for garchives@archives.gentoo.org; Tue, 05 Feb 2008 07:00:21 +0000 Received: from pigeon.gentoo.org (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by pigeon.gentoo.org (Postfix) with SMTP id BEF88E05D6; Tue, 5 Feb 2008 07:00:19 +0000 (UTC) Received: from smtp.gentoo.org (smtp.gentoo.org [140.211.166.183]) by pigeon.gentoo.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 9B4E1E05D6 for ; Tue, 5 Feb 2008 07:00:19 +0000 (UTC) Received: from gentoo.org (c-67-171-150-177.hsd1.or.comcast.net [67.171.150.177]) (using TLSv1 with cipher DHE-RSA-AES128-SHA (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by smtp.gentoo.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 08CAA65EA9; Tue, 5 Feb 2008 07:00:19 +0000 (UTC) Date: Mon, 4 Feb 2008 23:00:17 -0800 From: Donnie Berkholz To: gentoo-dev@lists.gentoo.org, cla@gentoo.org Subject: [gentoo-dev] Re: [gentoo-commits] gentoo-x86 commit in net-irc/kvirc: ChangeLog kvirc-3.2.6_pre20080204.ebuild Message-ID: <20080205070017.GC11639@supernova> References: Precedence: bulk List-Post: List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Subscribe: List-Id: Gentoo Linux mail X-BeenThere: gentoo-dev@lists.gentoo.org Reply-to: gentoo-dev@lists.gentoo.org MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.16 (2007-06-09) X-Archives-Salt: e3fb1dcb-7c7e-4d97-b5bb-84db24f059a1 X-Archives-Hash: 3c0e63ff8feaf614c3ccd187682c6ca9 On 14:11 Mon 04 Feb , Dawid Weglinski (cla) wrote: > 1.1 net-irc/kvirc/kvirc-3.2.6_pre20080204.ebuild > > file : http://sources.gentoo.org/viewcvs.py/gentoo-x86/net-irc/kvirc/kvirc-3.2.6_pre20080204.ebuild?rev=1.1&view=markup > plain: http://sources.gentoo.org/viewcvs.py/gentoo-x86/net-irc/kvirc/kvirc-3.2.6_pre20080204.ebuild?rev=1.1&content-type=text/plain > src_unpack() { > unpack ${A} > cd "${S}" > ./autogen.sh > epatch "${FILESDIR}"/${PN}-svn-kdedir-fix.patch > epatch "${FILESDIR}"/${PN}-gendoc.patch > } Any particular reason to not use eautoreconf? Thanks, Donnie -- gentoo-dev@lists.gentoo.org mailing list