From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from pigeon.gentoo.org ([69.77.167.62] helo=lists.gentoo.org) by finch.gentoo.org with esmtp (Exim 4.60) (envelope-from ) id 1JKgi5-0005um-9q for garchives@archives.gentoo.org; Thu, 31 Jan 2008 21:12:37 +0000 Received: from pigeon.gentoo.org (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by pigeon.gentoo.org (Postfix) with SMTP id 4B980E058E; Thu, 31 Jan 2008 21:12:27 +0000 (UTC) Received: from smtpi2.ngi.it (smtpi2.ngi.it [88.149.128.21]) by pigeon.gentoo.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id E5A70E0587; Thu, 31 Jan 2008 21:12:26 +0000 (UTC) Received: from gondor (88-149-138-215.dynamic.ngi.it [88.149.138.215]) by smtpi2.ngi.it (8.13.8/8.13.8) with ESMTP id m0VLCP0x000978; Thu, 31 Jan 2008 22:12:26 +0100 From: Davide Cendron To: gentoo-dev@lists.gentoo.org Subject: Re: [gentoo-dev] RFC: removal of digest files from the tree Date: Thu, 31 Jan 2008 22:12:22 +0100 User-Agent: KMail/1.9.7 References: <479BD99A.8010408@gentoo.org> <1201738488.21440.125.camel@workbox.quova.com> <20080131010036.GG20263@curie-int.orbis-terrarum.net> In-Reply-To: <20080131010036.GG20263@curie-int.orbis-terrarum.net> Cc: gentoo-doc@lists.gentoo.org Precedence: bulk List-Post: List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Subscribe: List-Id: Gentoo Linux mail X-BeenThere: gentoo-dev@lists.gentoo.org Reply-to: gentoo-dev@lists.gentoo.org MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/signed; boundary="nextPart1455354.KFSUYa7plz"; protocol="application/pgp-signature"; micalg=pgp-sha1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Message-Id: <200801312212.22804.scen@gentoo.org> X-Archives-Salt: 3958ca2e-ab29-401a-b18b-ced7f6626780 X-Archives-Hash: f4fdd3f7d7dac5238b4aaac753b538d0 --nextPart1455354.KFSUYa7plz Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-15" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Content-Disposition: inline Il Thursday 31 January 2008 02:00:36 Robin H. Johnson ha scritto: > On Wed, Jan 30, 2008 at 04:14:48PM -0800, Chris Gianelloni wrote: > > It really is best done in the tree first, so everything is correct for > > the snapshot. We didn't have much issue last time because we push > > "manifest1_obsolete" into the snapshot, so digests are removed, anyway, > > but I'd *really* prefer if this were done prior to the snapshot being > > made. > > Ok, so we're just blocking on the docs guys. > > Are they actively working on it so I can go ahead and take the digests > out anyway? jkt has recently committed some fix: http://sources.gentoo.org/viewcvs.py/gentoo/xml/htdocs/doc/en/bugzilla-howt= o.xml?r1=3D1.10&r2=3D1.11 http://sources.gentoo.org/viewcvs.py/gentoo/xml/htdocs/doc/en/gentoo-ppc-fa= q.xml?r1=3D1.66&r2=3D1.67 http://sources.gentoo.org/viewcvs.py/gentoo/xml/htdocs/doc/en/handbook/hb-w= orking-portage.xml?r1=3D1.68&r2=3D1.69 I don't know exactly how many other docs must be changed accordingly, it's= =20 better to ping some GDP member to get a better feedback. Cheers, =2D-=20 Davide Cendron Gentoo Documentation Project Italian Lead Translator http://www.gentoo.org/doc/it/ --nextPart1455354.KFSUYa7plz Content-Type: application/pgp-signature; name=signature.asc Content-Description: This is a digitally signed message part. -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v2.0.7 (GNU/Linux) iD8DBQBHojm2bRVk4xqJ97MRAiR7AKCAItZdD82RotI/Bu9yE3r0F5KTkACgnjA7 D5md2OeLX10DZ4ogpGBSOoY= =I5Fq -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --nextPart1455354.KFSUYa7plz-- -- gentoo-dev@lists.gentoo.org mailing list