From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from pigeon.gentoo.org ([69.77.167.62] helo=lists.gentoo.org) by finch.gentoo.org with esmtp (Exim 4.60) (envelope-from ) id 1JGLDh-0003qi-EY for garchives@archives.gentoo.org; Sat, 19 Jan 2008 21:27:17 +0000 Received: from pigeon.gentoo.org (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by pigeon.gentoo.org (Postfix) with SMTP id 34532E0304; Sat, 19 Jan 2008 21:27:15 +0000 (UTC) Received: from smtp.gentoo.org (smtp.gentoo.org [140.211.166.183]) by pigeon.gentoo.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 0F202E0304 for ; Sat, 19 Jan 2008 21:27:15 +0000 (UTC) Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by smtp.gentoo.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 571386585B; Sat, 19 Jan 2008 21:27:14 +0000 (UTC) From: Mike Frysinger Organization: wh0rd.org To: gentoo-dev@lists.gentoo.org Subject: Re: [gentoo-dev] Concerns about WIPE_TMP change Date: Sat, 19 Jan 2008 16:26:11 -0500 User-Agent: KMail/1.9.7 Cc: Stefan de Konink , Roy Marples References: <479156FF.5030508@xs4all.nl> <200801191554.25808.vapier@gentoo.org> <47926598.4010204@xs4all.nl> In-Reply-To: <47926598.4010204@xs4all.nl> Precedence: bulk List-Post: List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Subscribe: List-Id: Gentoo Linux mail X-BeenThere: gentoo-dev@lists.gentoo.org Reply-to: gentoo-dev@lists.gentoo.org MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/signed; boundary="nextPart1256472.UdbkKkzBR9"; protocol="application/pgp-signature"; micalg=pgp-sha1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Message-Id: <200801191626.12185.vapier@gentoo.org> X-Archives-Salt: 648e25b4-bf00-45a4-96f4-b187ab4cc3a0 X-Archives-Hash: becd69184ed7b8242f6d030a01bfaa23 --nextPart1256472.UdbkKkzBR9 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Content-Disposition: inline On Saturday 19 January 2008, Stefan de Konink wrote: > Mike Frysinger schreef: > > On Saturday 19 January 2008, Roy Marples wrote: > >> On Sat, 2008-01-19 at 02:48 +0100, Stefan de Konink wrote: > >>> In my opinion WIPE_TMP should be in the same state > >>> as RC_PARALLEL_STARTUP. > >> > >> That's a fair point. > > > > how ? these two options are not related in the slightest. > > Because both options should be enabled manually under the presumption if > one knows what one is doing. Potential dataloss vs Potential boot > problems, I think that is the same ball park. as Roy points out, parallel startup is stabilized which means it will be=20 enabled by default WIPE_TMP had already been moved to yes by default in baselayout-2, i just g= ot=20 tired of waiting i can add an elog, but the arguments for not turning it on by default are f= ar=20 from convincing =2Dmike --nextPart1256472.UdbkKkzBR9 Content-Type: application/pgp-signature; name=signature.asc Content-Description: This is a digitally signed message part. -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v2.0.7 (GNU/Linux) iQIVAwUAR5Jq9EFjO5/oN/WBAQJRuhAAoIvRfc0ePbeLRm1gr4qhn1lRwIRHt5jg K8TxOzqgxpO/OTs1kklpcJIt2pJ1WA4zFxjt1kFMMpON0pYA4pVtCRGf51VZ7/2g HCNV+svjcxkuMqOCRPE/xdc71Wjeq4wDQfe/taLzmDvdZtyDgiT3tSb673cyMEXT /c7KFGDi3whdXzlbcOIbmFRzN2F2XicN0SzkMssdB9L+aG2cB4REmTczsJg3wloT kVhDEk37JIEmMhSROcNPIyXOYLz8ZZBtJejXC8KTGx/l3NGVMpP6TeFBiDg6YjF7 aDr+mSIQV7P7DCKnm0T8fq5HmO1Nd8l+sHi/MLv2cVbOsxSo1EYYomggYFczNMKM VVqdoVJvlmw02OYrMaoaT1s0Nl4si675dkeBIajq2qxPD1X7/+4UFc97js91Z+Nb 4t3pGQeOtCdYUAhGIOD/6Jdln73cIwls2B28dU160PrqJfO2uWIEGDT6e08kZYsP 33vbIJTtjbE4ESH8RKhFye0Z8OV20vojVJBbg4CyDHDaSdbvyZa+SEWewhgErPUi 65hGjRGSbPtrlheT1I5GETUl5zBCXwRUX0hampqJlB5XbPuuc+Jim0FHVmWoC0au psBsnhPC82VPYqKzMbIBkI8jyaEoiBX7b9JPW3Z+pbYgooP/u7rblI3gptLLXBnD TOxBQqIEwLk= =8SSP -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --nextPart1256472.UdbkKkzBR9-- -- gentoo-dev@lists.gentoo.org mailing list