From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from pigeon.gentoo.org ([69.77.167.62] helo=lists.gentoo.org) by finch.gentoo.org with esmtp (Exim 4.60) (envelope-from ) id 1JEE4R-00019X-MD for garchives@archives.gentoo.org; Mon, 14 Jan 2008 01:24:59 +0000 Received: from pigeon.gentoo.org (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by pigeon.gentoo.org (Postfix) with SMTP id A7952E04E1; Mon, 14 Jan 2008 01:24:57 +0000 (UTC) Received: from aerie.halcy0n.com (aerie.halcy0n.com [65.98.89.194]) by pigeon.gentoo.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 91695E04E1 for ; Mon, 14 Jan 2008 01:24:57 +0000 (UTC) Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by aerie.halcy0n.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 6E6087EB04 for ; Sun, 13 Jan 2008 20:24:57 -0500 (EST) X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at halcy0n.com Received: from aerie.halcy0n.com ([127.0.0.1]) by localhost (halcy0n.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with LMTP id BsMceZZda+xP for ; Sun, 13 Jan 2008 20:24:53 -0500 (EST) Received: by aerie.halcy0n.com (Postfix, from userid 1000) id 265537EB05; Sun, 13 Jan 2008 20:24:53 -0500 (EST) Date: Sun, 13 Jan 2008 20:24:53 -0500 From: Mark Loeser To: gentoo-dev@lists.gentoo.org Subject: [gentoo-dev] USE flag documentation Message-ID: <20080114012453.GG24512@aerie.halcy0n.com> Precedence: bulk List-Post: List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Subscribe: List-Id: Gentoo Linux mail X-BeenThere: gentoo-dev@lists.gentoo.org Reply-to: gentoo-dev@lists.gentoo.org MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/signed; micalg=pgp-sha1; protocol="application/pgp-signature"; boundary="Zrag5V6pnZGjLKiw" Content-Disposition: inline User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.16 (2007-06-09) X-Archives-Salt: 0a2db061-4a68-4775-8784-4324ddd3bdb7 X-Archives-Hash: 9c77dc715612dcdae53c5b1b6790c7d9 --Zrag5V6pnZGjLKiw Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf8 Content-Disposition: inline Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Here is a newer revision of the GLEP. I still have multiple methods of solving this problem (mostly because I want and *need* input from people as to what they would prefer). Please tell me what you would want to use so I can come up with a more precise specification. What exactly do we need this system to do that we can't do now? Is overriding the USE flag with use.local.desc sufficient and we just need to document the current solution properly? Please...let me know how you feel about this. http://dev.gentoo.org/~halcy0n/gleps/glep-0054.html Thanks, --=20 Mark Loeser email - halcy0n AT gentoo DOT org email - mark AT halcy0n DOT com web - http://www.halcy0n.com --Zrag5V6pnZGjLKiw Content-Type: application/pgp-signature Content-Disposition: inline -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v2.0.7 (GNU/Linux) iD8DBQFHirnlCRZPokWLroQRAo9eAKDciEhxl0oajifen9LgbLHauBMpvQCfe4dX i85cPeBwFlTHHm8wdoog/9w= =NNxs -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --Zrag5V6pnZGjLKiw-- -- gentoo-dev@lists.gentoo.org mailing list