From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from pigeon.gentoo.org ([69.77.167.62] helo=lists.gentoo.org) by finch.gentoo.org with esmtp (Exim 4.60) (envelope-from ) id 1JDGGF-0001Tn-0N for garchives@archives.gentoo.org; Fri, 11 Jan 2008 09:33:11 +0000 Received: from pigeon.gentoo.org (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by pigeon.gentoo.org (Postfix) with SMTP id 3C556E09E4; Fri, 11 Jan 2008 09:33:09 +0000 (UTC) Received: from smtp.gentoo.org (smtp.gentoo.org [140.211.166.183]) by pigeon.gentoo.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 11809E09E4 for ; Fri, 11 Jan 2008 09:33:09 +0000 (UTC) Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by smtp.gentoo.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 281BC64B50; Fri, 11 Jan 2008 09:33:08 +0000 (UTC) From: Mike Frysinger Organization: wh0rd.org To: gentoo-dev@lists.gentoo.org Subject: Re: [gentoo-dev] Of Mips and Devs [Was: Monthly Gentoo Council Reminder for January] Date: Fri, 11 Jan 2008 04:33:06 -0500 User-Agent: KMail/1.9.7 Cc: Kumba References: <20080101103002.083C4652C4@smtp.gentoo.org> <200801100134.35669.vapier@gentoo.org> <4786FFD6.6000105@gentoo.org> In-Reply-To: <4786FFD6.6000105@gentoo.org> Precedence: bulk List-Post: List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Subscribe: List-Id: Gentoo Linux mail X-BeenThere: gentoo-dev@lists.gentoo.org Reply-to: gentoo-dev@lists.gentoo.org MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/signed; boundary="nextPart1569075.EksxDYxtyK"; protocol="application/pgp-signature"; micalg=pgp-sha1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Message-Id: <200801110433.07506.vapier@gentoo.org> X-Archives-Salt: b601ae37-8d76-471a-ab82-26b44a83e135 X-Archives-Hash: f1361044f74c5c3c01f48ab3d3e5280b --nextPart1569075.EksxDYxtyK Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Content-Disposition: inline On Friday 11 January 2008, Kumba wrote: > Mike Frysinger wrote: > > that certainly sounds reasonable to me. if the stable cant be > > maintained, let the common workflow of developers transition it back to > > ~arch until someone has the time to keep arch usable. changing > > profiles.desc accordingly should be done ahead of time. perhaps a new > > category for profiles.desc ? "exp" for such ports ? i could see all > > *-fbsd ports being moved there. tweak repoman to be less verbose about > > dep issues for such profiles and we're set. > > Sounds like a plan. 'exp' would be the 'status' field? yeah. i'll fork a new thread on the topic. > > i see dropping keywords as a very last resort. getting a port *back* > > into the tree is a *tremendous* amount of work (i went through it and it > > was hell), while keeping ~arch alive is a sliver of effort and generally > > not a blocker for package maintainers. > > Aye, I believe that was sh's removal and subsequent re-add? arm actually. i blame solar. thanks Kumba, i'd wager my left one that without you there would be no mips. -mike --nextPart1569075.EksxDYxtyK Content-Type: application/pgp-signature; name=signature.asc Content-Description: This is a digitally signed message part. -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v2.0.8 (GNU/Linux) iQIcBAABAgAGBQJHhzfTAAoJEEFjO5/oN/WBBHEP/3IKwcTDnS5BXN2JgdKAtWum xJ2bVeuRoXhtkeKZT/ipwY5K6dx2uXjS91O/wfIgNdoAOzAlkJfFKrExL5+9cbTk 6hmGKde8GZNlryLhXkuBhYHpCmzpYpZoJyVOgV04+qRSbUkKlcaNz5N2W1pf9kh3 XSUwjWyq+jhr9JMDvvaitFZ66gqBXR50LjnzaC08hA1pyhQ+dSZz9BD0pb5ycwC7 LVvMWyBbBiOFOrHvTEGnt0JDCMu2HABZro2FmGoJ0KVweBsZtdmqp5Z5fDlY7U5x Ry64/Yo/BRlOYgFNpxs9MD4yxB5x6JHEhLN2Dj7qyN2X8oO60JLh5bRqbfxMLeR/ Ktz7AT0SfwxaO/6TCxQyTioRPH1szZR1rGnqz/uaqKgWalR+h+EfQmeVD1uL1W5U +tctxXNnPBDLcGIiOxIzxMB7w+k1HKsGXaX2f8qTTVQiTGS7cMWQSs6gliyrgWsb ySBpEVhyX5ZgiN/s9uaR9qmku5OvKYYJbuunSTc4GzlZDZAvePv8SlPf8fT+pOEi nIbKy0La7P2OXpGHlUePA6TQOI48L8gulJpP8wjM11nLYy573P9kk85j7RU09W9q GPPVJ9Iq8vEPbz1U88TZvtwnFchBJcpstQgN5uFLrUGA41DRiwtTKkK4F+8OmXXA MtqHv9VSmDQ3sfXHbyzA =Qba6 -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --nextPart1569075.EksxDYxtyK-- -- gentoo-dev@lists.gentoo.org mailing list