From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from pigeon.gentoo.org ([69.77.167.62] helo=lists.gentoo.org) by finch.gentoo.org with esmtp (Exim 4.60) (envelope-from ) id 1JCigo-0005pI-H1 for garchives@archives.gentoo.org; Wed, 09 Jan 2008 21:42:22 +0000 Received: from pigeon.gentoo.org (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by pigeon.gentoo.org (Postfix) with SMTP id 4F4FAE07B4; Wed, 9 Jan 2008 21:42:12 +0000 (UTC) Received: from osiris.cheops.ods.org (osiris.cheops.ods.org [82.95.138.191]) by pigeon.gentoo.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 26F39E07B4 for ; Wed, 9 Jan 2008 21:42:12 +0000 (UTC) Received: from tefnut.cheops.ods.org ([2001:888:1022:0:211:24ff:fe37:e46e] helo=gentoo.org) by osiris.cheops.ods.org with esmtps (TLSv1:AES256-SHA:256) (Exim 4.68) (envelope-from ) id 1JCigd-0000gY-AK for gentoo-dev@lists.gentoo.org; Wed, 09 Jan 2008 22:42:11 +0100 Date: Wed, 9 Jan 2008 22:42:12 +0100 From: Fabian Groffen To: gentoo-dev@lists.gentoo.org Subject: Re: [gentoo-dev] Re: Item for 10 Jan 2008 Council meeting Message-ID: <20080109214212.GD16203@gentoo.org> Mail-Followup-To: gentoo-dev@lists.gentoo.org References: <1199887212.23272.59.camel@liasis.inforead.com> <1199908308.8082.20.camel@inertia.twi-31o2.org> <1199910451.23272.74.camel@liasis.inforead.com> <28CD260DF8914E95B5776F9B8225C926@draco2> Precedence: bulk List-Post: List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Subscribe: List-Id: Gentoo Linux mail X-BeenThere: gentoo-dev@lists.gentoo.org Reply-to: gentoo-dev@lists.gentoo.org MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <28CD260DF8914E95B5776F9B8225C926@draco2> User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.17 (Darwin 8.11.0, VIM - Vi IMproved 7.1) Organization: Gentoo Foundation, Inc. X-Archives-Salt: 8eaa6eb0-f446-4d24-a75a-acc36e7c9be1 X-Archives-Hash: ff77812f6dccfb2a49c6a4490dc4c970 On 09-01-2008 13:03:13 -0800, Chrissy Fullam wrote: > You have a negative history with wolf31o2, and the details of which quite > frankly should be kept off this mailing list. His negative experiences > throughout all of 2007 with Conflict Resolution and consequently Developer > Relations justify any of your alleged 'attacks on devrel.' Let's take this > discussion elsewhere. > Kind regards, > Christina Fullam > Gentoo Developer Relations Lead | Gentoo Public Relations IMHO, you have a very big conflict of interest in this issue. Why do you (for the second time) handle a case like this one, and not someone else from devrel? I have a hard time to take your message as an objective and unbiased one. -- Fabian Groffen Gentoo on a different level -- gentoo-dev@lists.gentoo.org mailing list