From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from pigeon.gentoo.org ([69.77.167.62] helo=lists.gentoo.org) by finch.gentoo.org with esmtp (Exim 4.60) (envelope-from ) id 1JCgMf-0005FP-Uj for garchives@archives.gentoo.org; Wed, 09 Jan 2008 19:13:26 +0000 Received: from pigeon.gentoo.org (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by pigeon.gentoo.org (Postfix) with SMTP id AF310E05F2; Wed, 9 Jan 2008 19:13:24 +0000 (UTC) Received: from smtp.ferdyx.org (170.Red-213-96-222.staticIP.rima-tde.net [213.96.222.170]) by pigeon.gentoo.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 683BFE05F2 for ; Wed, 9 Jan 2008 19:13:24 +0000 (UTC) Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by smtp.ferdyx.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 2CB1C8D306 for ; Wed, 9 Jan 2008 20:19:50 +0100 (CET) X-Virus-Scanned: Debian amavisd-new at ferdyx.org Received: from smtp.ferdyx.org ([127.0.0.1]) by localhost (tungsteno.ferdyx.org [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id LaLgsC7W75IC for ; Wed, 9 Jan 2008 20:19:47 +0100 (CET) Received: from snowcone (unknown [213.121.151.206]) (using TLSv1 with cipher DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by smtp.ferdyx.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 2F3DE8D305 for ; Wed, 9 Jan 2008 20:19:47 +0100 (CET) Date: Wed, 9 Jan 2008 19:13:16 +0000 From: Ciaran McCreesh To: gentoo-dev@lists.gentoo.org Subject: Re: [gentoo-dev] Re: Monthly Gentoo Council Reminder for January Message-ID: <20080109191316.78998731@snowcone> In-Reply-To: <200801092006.01056.philantrop@gentoo.org> References: <20080101103002.083C4652C4@smtp.gentoo.org> <200801091929.56749.philantrop@gentoo.org> <20080109184538.4cc154e8@snowcone> <200801092006.01056.philantrop@gentoo.org> X-Mailer: Claws Mail 3.2.0 (GTK+ 2.12.1; x86_64-pc-linux-gnu) Precedence: bulk List-Post: List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Subscribe: List-Id: Gentoo Linux mail X-BeenThere: gentoo-dev@lists.gentoo.org Reply-to: gentoo-dev@lists.gentoo.org Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/signed; boundary="Sig_/ykVpCXp7hUNXItHy9D4ZBNw"; protocol="application/pgp-signature"; micalg=PGP-SHA1 X-Archives-Salt: 30d2fd08-1809-4bd1-bc01-a255d3624c70 X-Archives-Hash: 3270535cec9dafb0af4398b697cb374c --Sig_/ykVpCXp7hUNXItHy9D4ZBNw Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable On Wed, 9 Jan 2008 20:06:00 +0100 "Wulf C. Krueger" wrote: > On Wednesday, 09. January 2008 19:45:38 Ciaran McCreesh wrote: > > > > Then the one particular part of 3.5.5 that's affected gets fixed > > > > and priority keyworded. > > > So you suggest that mips keeps doing nothing and expect others to > > > work *more* in exchange for that? > > Well, most users will simply ignore or postpone the mass upgrade,=20 >=20 > So far so good. If users postpone it, that's entirely their=20 > responsibility. It's all very well to say that, but which do you care about? Covering your ass and claiming that you have a secure distribution, or the security of end user systems? --=20 Ciaran McCreesh --Sig_/ykVpCXp7hUNXItHy9D4ZBNw Content-Type: application/pgp-signature; name=signature.asc Content-Disposition: attachment; filename=signature.asc -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v2.0.7 (GNU/Linux) iD8DBQFHhRzO96zL6DUtXhERAis9AJ4u4tiMTTA+coUKIvsOnrmr6euqRgCeNsZq pakjy0IWCO13h4oJcPK4t8U= =igDT -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --Sig_/ykVpCXp7hUNXItHy9D4ZBNw-- -- gentoo-dev@lists.gentoo.org mailing list