Re: [gentoo-dev] OpenRC available for testing.

[Mike Frysinger <vapier@gentoo.org>]

[-- Attachment #1: Type: text/plain, Size: 1213 bytes --]

On Thursday 03 January 2008, Wulf C. Krueger wrote:
> On Thursday, 03. January 2008 11:18:19 Richard Brown wrote:
> > While this thread remains highly entertaining, I'm sure as a past
> > gentoo developer Roy remembers that we don't generally use gentoo-dev
> > to bug fix poorly written makefiles,
>
> First of all, OpenRC is likely to become an integral part of Gentoo so its
> discussion is most likely on-topic here.
>
> Furthermore, I prefer reading about "poorly written" Makefiles instead of
> poorly written mails, dear Richard.

come guys, lesbie friends.  Richard has a point that discussing broken 
makefiles generally isnt on topic for the list, but it'd be hard to maintain 
separate threads properly (off-list/somewhere else about building, on-list 
about conventions/changes/etc...).  people miss things and the threads get 
fragmented and it's a mess.  so please just bear the brunt of the on/off 
topic pieces as in the end the winner clearly is us.

> You might want to remember that subscription to his mailinglist is no
> longer mandatory if technical discussions bother you so much.

this really wasnt needed.  he had a valid concern.  please give up some hugz.
-mike

[-- Attachment #2: This is a digitally signed message part. --]
[-- Type: application/pgp-signature, Size: 835 bytes --]