From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from pigeon.gentoo.org ([69.77.167.62] helo=lists.gentoo.org) by finch.gentoo.org with esmtp (Exim 4.60) (envelope-from ) id 1JCbwz-00069F-UY for garchives@archives.gentoo.org; Wed, 09 Jan 2008 14:30:38 +0000 Received: from pigeon.gentoo.org (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by pigeon.gentoo.org (Postfix) with SMTP id 9F440E0586; Wed, 9 Jan 2008 14:30:36 +0000 (UTC) Received: from mo-p07-ob.rzone.de (mo-p07-ob.rzone.de [81.169.146.188]) by pigeon.gentoo.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 2F9B3E0586; Wed, 9 Jan 2008 14:30:36 +0000 (UTC) X-RZG-CLASS-ID: mo07 X-RZG-AUTH: hXn+rC1arvT7Lf9I/zKDqjrgIkrokD1Qxy5bIqfbp9I10BMNL35Kum+fVbT8+ijLtsxChh9Jt6k= Received: from localhost (u-7-205.vpn.RWTH-Aachen.DE [137.226.103.205]) by post.webmailer.de (mrclete mo3) (RZmta 15.1) with ESMTP id g070c8k09DVlqn ; Wed, 9 Jan 2008 15:30:35 +0100 (MET) (envelope-from: ) Date: Wed, 9 Jan 2008 15:29:50 +0100 From: Christian Faulhammer To: gentoo-dev@lists.gentoo.org Cc: gentoo-lisp@lists.gentoo.org Subject: [gentoo-dev] Re: Projects and subproject status Message-ID: <20080109152950.6f3fba17@gentoo.org> In-Reply-To: <47829A4A.5000905@gentoo.org> References: <47829A4A.5000905@gentoo.org> X-Mailer: Claws Mail 3.2.0 (GTK+ 2.12.1; i686-pc-linux-gnu) Precedence: bulk List-Post: List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Subscribe: List-Id: Gentoo Linux mail X-BeenThere: gentoo-dev@lists.gentoo.org Reply-to: gentoo-dev@lists.gentoo.org Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/signed; boundary="Sig_/7MyAylPqSZedwLWhj8.FT5s"; protocol="application/pgp-signature"; micalg=PGP-SHA1 X-Archives-Salt: 4f8e3584-8778-48e9-ae68-f476bf071c6e X-Archives-Hash: 5b8b9ef817af5ea48d457b07c33ea6a6 --Sig_/7MyAylPqSZedwLWhj8.FT5s Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Hi, CCing gentoo-lisp mailing list. Luca Barbato : > Please project leaders try to reply in short. Though Emacs project (subproject of Lisp) has no official leader, I speak up as senior dev. :) =20 > Are we fine? XEmacs: I cannot tell much, but graaff seems to have closed most of the severe bugs and worked on having more/bette eclasses for the app-xemacs category. GNU Emacs: * We took care of nearly all incoming bugs and punched ones still sitting around * Started keywording all packages with stable x86 and amd64 (majority is done) * Split up of eselect-ctags and eselect-emacs so them Vim wheenies stop crying (just after Portage was able to handle needed upgrade path correctly) * Files which enable additional packages from app-emacs category in Emacs are now stored in /usr/share/emacs/site-lisp/site-gentoo.d/, with full backwards compatability (fully transparent for non-aware users). emacs-updater from eselec-emacs package can check if you still have site files in the old location. * Support for echangelog (by C-c C-a) in app-emacs/gentoo-syntax * Man, we got so many test plans for our packages that arch teams should be able to stabilise our packages in the blink of an eye. * Fixed some more packages that were working but not in a good shape regarding coding practice (Emacs and Ebuild) > What are we going to do: * Improve the tree further, though we are nearly done * Bring some really handy packages into the tree from our overlay * Improve gentoo-syntax to use the whole Gentoo toolchain for Ebuild developers V-Li --=20 Christian Faulhammer, Gentoo Lisp project , #gentoo-lisp on FreeNode --Sig_/7MyAylPqSZedwLWhj8.FT5s Content-Type: application/pgp-signature; name=signature.asc Content-Disposition: attachment; filename=signature.asc -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v2.0.7 (GNU/Linux) iD8DBQFHhNptNQqtfCuFneMRAt68AJ9q1xNLsrmLY5zvnuSpwF/Z4aoSuQCeJkWp vX7+mx5WOgr/OH9YRSNjlAg= =qTOj -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --Sig_/7MyAylPqSZedwLWhj8.FT5s-- -- gentoo-dev@lists.gentoo.org mailing list