From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from pigeon.gentoo.org ([69.77.167.62] helo=lists.gentoo.org) by finch.gentoo.org with esmtp (Exim 4.60) (envelope-from ) id 1JCcqB-0000g6-EN for garchives@archives.gentoo.org; Wed, 09 Jan 2008 15:27:39 +0000 Received: from pigeon.gentoo.org (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by pigeon.gentoo.org (Postfix) with SMTP id 5A511E059F; Wed, 9 Jan 2008 15:27:38 +0000 (UTC) Received: from smtp.ferdyx.org (170.Red-213-96-222.staticIP.rima-tde.net [213.96.222.170]) by pigeon.gentoo.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id C46F6E059F for ; Wed, 9 Jan 2008 15:27:37 +0000 (UTC) Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by smtp.ferdyx.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 425978D306 for ; Wed, 9 Jan 2008 16:34:02 +0100 (CET) X-Virus-Scanned: Debian amavisd-new at ferdyx.org Received: from smtp.ferdyx.org ([127.0.0.1]) by localhost (tungsteno.ferdyx.org [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id y5pLH5aGKnUy for ; Wed, 9 Jan 2008 16:34:00 +0100 (CET) Received: from posidon.ferdyx.org (posidon.ferdyx.org [192.168.0.2]) (using TLSv1 with cipher DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by smtp.ferdyx.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 6367C8D305 for ; Wed, 9 Jan 2008 16:34:00 +0100 (CET) Received: by posidon.ferdyx.org (nbSMTP-1.01-cvs) for uid 1000 (using TLSv1/SSLv3 with cipher DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) ferdy@gentoo.org; Wed, 9 Jan 2008 16:27:34 +0100 (CET) Date: Wed, 9 Jan 2008 16:27:34 +0100 From: "Fernando J. Pereda" To: gentoo-dev@lists.gentoo.org Subject: Re: [gentoo-dev] Monthly Gentoo Council Reminder for January Message-ID: <20080109152734.GA6181@ferdyx.org> Mail-Followup-To: gentoo-dev@lists.gentoo.org References: <20080101103002.083C4652C4@smtp.gentoo.org> <54551.192.168.2.159.1199365359.squirrel@www.aei-tech.com> <20080109121309.GA14454@ferdyx.org> <50574.192.168.2.159.1199888711.squirrel@www.aei-tech.com> Precedence: bulk List-Post: List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Subscribe: List-Id: Gentoo Linux mail X-BeenThere: gentoo-dev@lists.gentoo.org Reply-to: gentoo-dev@lists.gentoo.org MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/signed; micalg=pgp-sha1; protocol="application/pgp-signature"; boundary="ZPt4rx8FFjLCG7dd" Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <50574.192.168.2.159.1199888711.squirrel@www.aei-tech.com> User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.16 (2007-06-09) X-Archives-Salt: ea061b9f-c81f-457c-b786-4a37012c1163 X-Archives-Hash: 2784e6a2d96a03ac3d3d6b47b8548ddb --ZPt4rx8FFjLCG7dd Content-Type: text/plain; charset=iso-8859-1 Content-Disposition: inline Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable On Wed, Jan 09, 2008 at 09:25:11AM -0500, Caleb Tennis wrote: > > Why taking it against arch teams? How is that different from > > "certain maintainer not taking care of a bug that holds > > stabilization of certain package by some time measured in months" ? > > I'll tell you my answer: 'no difference at all'. > > You are right, there's not much difference. However, I brought up the > topic because I felt like this particular situation was a bit of a > problem that needed to be addressed. Yours is also one that > can/should potentially be addressed, and I advise you to recommend the > council discuss it as well. Well, while discussing what you brought up, they should _also_ consider what I said as part of the same (so-called) problem. > My goal wasn't to point fingers or to call anyone lazy. My goal was > to address that if development in this certain area has stagnated, how > can those of us who it affects continue to move forward? This is > simply an area that is "gray" and needs to be discussed. There are > many other gray areas that need to be discussed too. > > I understand we all have real lives and are volunteers. But if there > are areas that we are responsible for and we aren't able to meet the > needs/demands of the other developers in those areas, it's only fair > to let them continue moving forward. > > I never even mentioned any specific arch in my original request, nor > did I call any developer out. So please, nobody needs to take this > personally. I didn't take it personally myself, honestly, I couldn't care less. Wonder why there is almost no non-mainstream arch team people contributing to this thread? - ferdy --=20 Fernando J. Pereda Garcimart=EDn 20BB BDC3 761A 4781 E6ED ED0B 0A48 5B0C 60BD 28D4 --ZPt4rx8FFjLCG7dd Content-Type: application/pgp-signature Content-Disposition: inline -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v1.4.6 (GNU/Linux) iD8DBQFHhOfmCkhbDGC9KNQRAvLrAJ99dXeUNG9sq7MmUG0MIx8z/fTOoACaAkwl HqkdX3rdSZlL6wCNM8Hv3fc= =Cjl2 -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --ZPt4rx8FFjLCG7dd-- -- gentoo-dev@lists.gentoo.org mailing list