From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from pigeon.gentoo.org ([69.77.167.62] helo=lists.gentoo.org) by finch.gentoo.org with esmtp (Exim 4.60) (envelope-from ) id 1JCcCQ-0006oz-2g for garchives@archives.gentoo.org; Wed, 09 Jan 2008 14:46:34 +0000 Received: from pigeon.gentoo.org (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by pigeon.gentoo.org (Postfix) with SMTP id C654DE055F; Wed, 9 Jan 2008 14:46:31 +0000 (UTC) Received: from smtp.ferdyx.org (170.Red-213-96-222.staticIP.rima-tde.net [213.96.222.170]) by pigeon.gentoo.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 7E91DE055F for ; Wed, 9 Jan 2008 14:46:31 +0000 (UTC) Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by smtp.ferdyx.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id B6B538D306 for ; Wed, 9 Jan 2008 15:52:55 +0100 (CET) X-Virus-Scanned: Debian amavisd-new at ferdyx.org Received: from smtp.ferdyx.org ([127.0.0.1]) by localhost (tungsteno.ferdyx.org [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id iO+lzsbz10al for ; Wed, 9 Jan 2008 15:52:54 +0100 (CET) Received: from snowcone (unknown [213.121.151.206]) (using TLSv1 with cipher DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by smtp.ferdyx.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id F044C8D305 for ; Wed, 9 Jan 2008 15:52:53 +0100 (CET) Date: Wed, 9 Jan 2008 14:46:25 +0000 From: Ciaran McCreesh To: gentoo-dev@lists.gentoo.org Subject: Re: [gentoo-dev] Re: Monthly Gentoo Council Reminder for January Message-ID: <20080109144625.3b443b9a@snowcone> In-Reply-To: <1199848318.5325.46.camel@vega.lnet> References: <20080101103002.083C4652C4@smtp.gentoo.org> <20080105043233.0935d2f8@snowcone> <61307.68.54.223.178.1199541823.squirrel@www.aei-tech.com> <20080106003356.46087fef@snowcone> <20080106233412.5875626f@snowcone> <1199829889.8108.12.camel@inertia.twi-31o2.org> <20080109021735.42cd3856@snowcone> <1199846287.8108.143.camel@inertia.twi-31o2.org> <20080109024125.3bfc9479@snowcone> <20080109024724.12bd71fc@snowcone> <1199848318.5325.46.camel@vega.lnet> X-Mailer: Claws Mail 3.2.0 (GTK+ 2.12.1; x86_64-pc-linux-gnu) Precedence: bulk List-Post: List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Subscribe: List-Id: Gentoo Linux mail X-BeenThere: gentoo-dev@lists.gentoo.org Reply-to: gentoo-dev@lists.gentoo.org Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/signed; boundary="Sig_/CqabFHrSqFDp50NeH6K+.nQ"; protocol="application/pgp-signature"; micalg=PGP-SHA1 X-Archives-Salt: 05267c27-bb86-48c7-bdab-7a5193226c32 X-Archives-Hash: 794e93830c935c4fec384c9a736e6f07 --Sig_/CqabFHrSqFDp50NeH6K+.nQ Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable On Wed, 09 Jan 2008 04:11:58 +0100 Matthias Langer wrote: > Really, this discussion is completely pointless unless some mips > users/developers join in - or aren't there any at all? I'd imagine most of them are staying well clear of it because they've already seen this discussion a dozen times before and know that it's just the usual malcontents going around making largely bogus claims and backing them up with lots of thinly veiled mips bashing rather than anything relevant... --=20 Ciaran McCreesh --Sig_/CqabFHrSqFDp50NeH6K+.nQ Content-Type: application/pgp-signature; name=signature.asc Content-Disposition: attachment; filename=signature.asc -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v2.0.7 (GNU/Linux) iD8DBQFHhN5D96zL6DUtXhERAm1MAJ9VRICfr5VrpQu5/VLX46o/ksdJKwCgofBS BulDBZGUCUuEtcm326IN1mk= =hr3O -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --Sig_/CqabFHrSqFDp50NeH6K+.nQ-- -- gentoo-dev@lists.gentoo.org mailing list