From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from pigeon.gentoo.org ([69.77.167.62] helo=lists.gentoo.org) by finch.gentoo.org with esmtp (Exim 4.60) (envelope-from ) id 1JCcAc-0006jt-RI for garchives@archives.gentoo.org; Wed, 09 Jan 2008 14:44:43 +0000 Received: from pigeon.gentoo.org (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by pigeon.gentoo.org (Postfix) with SMTP id 15BF7E0464; Wed, 9 Jan 2008 14:44:41 +0000 (UTC) Received: from smtp.ferdyx.org (170.Red-213-96-222.staticIP.rima-tde.net [213.96.222.170]) by pigeon.gentoo.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id B7952E0464 for ; Wed, 9 Jan 2008 14:44:40 +0000 (UTC) Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by smtp.ferdyx.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id DF20B8D306 for ; Wed, 9 Jan 2008 15:51:04 +0100 (CET) X-Virus-Scanned: Debian amavisd-new at ferdyx.org Received: from smtp.ferdyx.org ([127.0.0.1]) by localhost (tungsteno.ferdyx.org [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id TJ5Aco2xAZ-U for ; Wed, 9 Jan 2008 15:51:03 +0100 (CET) Received: from snowcone (unknown [213.121.151.206]) (using TLSv1 with cipher DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by smtp.ferdyx.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id EBE318D305 for ; Wed, 9 Jan 2008 15:51:02 +0100 (CET) Date: Wed, 9 Jan 2008 14:44:34 +0000 From: Ciaran McCreesh To: gentoo-dev@lists.gentoo.org Subject: Re: [gentoo-dev] Re: Monthly Gentoo Council Reminder for January Message-ID: <20080109144434.0c16695e@snowcone> In-Reply-To: <1199847569.7893.6.camel@inertia.twi-31o2.org> References: <20080101103002.083C4652C4@smtp.gentoo.org> <20080105043233.0935d2f8@snowcone> <61307.68.54.223.178.1199541823.squirrel@www.aei-tech.com> <20080106003356.46087fef@snowcone> <20080106233412.5875626f@snowcone> <1199829889.8108.12.camel@inertia.twi-31o2.org> <20080109021735.42cd3856@snowcone> <1199846287.8108.143.camel@inertia.twi-31o2.org> <20080109024125.3bfc9479@snowcone> <20080109024724.12bd71fc@snowcone> <1199847569.7893.6.camel@inertia.twi-31o2.org> X-Mailer: Claws Mail 3.2.0 (GTK+ 2.12.1; x86_64-pc-linux-gnu) Precedence: bulk List-Post: List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Subscribe: List-Id: Gentoo Linux mail X-BeenThere: gentoo-dev@lists.gentoo.org Reply-to: gentoo-dev@lists.gentoo.org Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/signed; boundary="Sig_/w3O7Xbvzpot6d426qUh8iA_"; protocol="application/pgp-signature"; micalg=PGP-SHA1 X-Archives-Salt: 41e526c1-a06d-4415-9b25-25d04daaa05b X-Archives-Hash: 8edeecd16037d14360b45a12d9ae1240 --Sig_/w3O7Xbvzpot6d426qUh8iA_ Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable On Tue, 08 Jan 2008 18:59:29 -0800 Chris Gianelloni wrote: > The issue that was raised is that certain arch teams are incapable of > keeping up with the minimal workload they already have and what should > be done about it. The issue was raised, with absolutely no proof or justification, and every previous time said issue has been raised it's turned out to be somewhere between highly misleading and utter bollocks. > We want the Council to do something about this issue. You can deny > the issue all that you want or try to deflect conversation from the > actual issue, but your opinion isn't very important to the much of > the current developer pool, seeing as how it doesn't affect you in > any way, having been thrown from the project, and all. Ah, so now what matters is who says something, not whether or not it's true. --=20 Ciaran McCreesh --Sig_/w3O7Xbvzpot6d426qUh8iA_ Content-Type: application/pgp-signature; name=signature.asc Content-Disposition: attachment; filename=signature.asc -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v2.0.7 (GNU/Linux) iD8DBQFHhN3U96zL6DUtXhERApxDAJ9GiB23xFJzaC//8JPDAhZfBW4NSQCgyiBY dIGkxSVH5Mx7AzQpb1fPYyc= =DIwq -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --Sig_/w3O7Xbvzpot6d426qUh8iA_-- -- gentoo-dev@lists.gentoo.org mailing list