From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from pigeon.gentoo.org ([69.77.167.62] helo=lists.gentoo.org) by finch.gentoo.org with esmtp (Exim 4.60) (envelope-from ) id 1JCKxw-0004oe-Lj for garchives@archives.gentoo.org; Tue, 08 Jan 2008 20:22:28 +0000 Received: from pigeon.gentoo.org (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by pigeon.gentoo.org (Postfix) with SMTP id E72A6E0CA7; Tue, 8 Jan 2008 20:22:25 +0000 (UTC) Received: from wa-out-1112.google.com (wa-out-1112.google.com [209.85.146.180]) by pigeon.gentoo.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id BB252E0CA7 for ; Tue, 8 Jan 2008 20:22:25 +0000 (UTC) Received: by wa-out-1112.google.com with SMTP id k34so13436912wah.10 for ; Tue, 08 Jan 2008 12:22:24 -0800 (PST) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=domainkey-signature:received:received:date:from:to:subject:message-id:references:mime-version:content-type:content-disposition:in-reply-to:user-agent; bh=xs2XL3fkkKX18tktJAch9mkOpOZ2hVUz3nJycX22MXE=; b=sswX68/UXeCvVAaYvcs8dqv97UDK4qdz/zY6xNzHvAC7P2WrLdmwNGrzvBjEFM2l1/yWNpUhhQyLQafnRuCyP+2FmIwj0VopYsyuPfOK9nA97bQw7V2ryq9+D73DBVbLDFo1V/ES3ig2jlinq7I9SDfgRBBB/UOlfhkP9KkOF5s= DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=date:from:to:subject:message-id:references:mime-version:content-type:content-disposition:in-reply-to:user-agent; b=MroM6bZFZGR6dsf4c+WVF42OQQFSVAqyEFw1ABtuVNxiVqVxOiMAsH9de+e6M6ksd1DZmxzX9XDTjwjNnRTutqIR7GEs8tYDUugul4HgaeUExc4Tw5IyVSKEUGv7LAkSgZ82fVsrcFPCqKhy+T3yT8RhrwXWi8Nz8g89FW1Y7S8= Received: by 10.114.202.15 with SMTP id z15mr1286386waf.72.1199823744947; Tue, 08 Jan 2008 12:22:24 -0800 (PST) Received: from seldon ( [76.251.95.6]) by mx.google.com with ESMTPS id z15sm91026pod.11.2008.01.08.12.22.24 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=OTHER); Tue, 08 Jan 2008 12:22:24 -0800 (PST) Date: Tue, 8 Jan 2008 12:22:03 -0800 From: Brian Harring To: gentoo-dev@lists.gentoo.org Subject: Re: [gentoo-dev] Re: [RFC] Reducing the size of the system package set Message-ID: <20080108202203.GA16575@seldon.sbcglobal.net> References: <20080108083000.GL14600@supernova> <3c32af40801080420o1fc856caga3187e74bbb843e6@mail.gmail.com> Precedence: bulk List-Post: List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Subscribe: List-Id: Gentoo Linux mail X-BeenThere: gentoo-dev@lists.gentoo.org Reply-to: gentoo-dev@lists.gentoo.org MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/signed; micalg=pgp-sha1; protocol="application/pgp-signature"; boundary="Kj7319i9nmIyA2yE" Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.13 (2006-08-11) X-Archives-Salt: 77d90a63-5566-4ec5-82dc-1d2e9392e259 X-Archives-Hash: c28826370f7e1bf4b9453b276f5f8dc5 --Kj7319i9nmIyA2yE Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable On Tue, Jan 08, 2008 at 01:37:28PM +0100, Diego 'Flameeyes' Petten?? wrote: > "Santiago M. Mola" writes: >=20 > > Having a complete > > deptree and having a small system package set should be independent > > goals, maybe your proposal should focus on making possible to have a > > deptree as complete as possible independently of what packages are on > > system set. >=20 > QA team already rejected such a proposal. Don't suppose you have a url for their reasoning? Among other things,=20 system set can vary, thus resulting in horked dependencies. =20 Additionally, a more accurate dep details is useful for=20 parallelization hints- breaking the reliance on system set as much as=20 possible, and treating it more like a users world set is something=20 I've wanted for a long while. ~brian --Kj7319i9nmIyA2yE Content-Type: application/pgp-signature Content-Disposition: inline -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v1.4.7 (GNU/Linux) iD8DBQFHg9trsiLx3HvNzgcRAmBwAJ9vS9dkTcPOGnWUuBFk5fSEaorabACfdyfW b7CWtAXb/soG2uXu0gPM9AY= =+jSF -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --Kj7319i9nmIyA2yE-- -- gentoo-dev@lists.gentoo.org mailing list