From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from lists.gentoo.org ([140.105.134.102] helo=robin.gentoo.org) by finch.gentoo.org with esmtp (Exim 4.60) (envelope-from ) id 1JBLmZ-00059V-VL for garchives@archives.gentoo.org; Sun, 06 Jan 2008 03:02:40 +0000 Received: from robin.gentoo.org (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by robin.gentoo.org (8.14.2/8.14.0) with SMTP id m0631npb005184; Sun, 6 Jan 2008 03:01:49 GMT Received: from smtp.ferdyx.org (170.Red-213-96-222.staticIP.rima-tde.net [213.96.222.170]) by robin.gentoo.org (8.14.2/8.14.0) with ESMTP id m062wWip030887 for ; Sun, 6 Jan 2008 02:58:32 GMT Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by smtp.ferdyx.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 065B98D306 for ; Sun, 6 Jan 2008 04:04:27 +0100 (CET) X-Virus-Scanned: Debian amavisd-new at ferdyx.org Received: from smtp.ferdyx.org ([127.0.0.1]) by localhost (tungsteno.ferdyx.org [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id cYr7yfG-56Tw for ; Sun, 6 Jan 2008 04:04:24 +0100 (CET) Received: from snowcone (unknown [213.121.151.206]) (using TLSv1 with cipher DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by smtp.ferdyx.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 16D628D305 for ; Sun, 6 Jan 2008 04:04:23 +0100 (CET) Date: Sun, 6 Jan 2008 02:58:25 +0000 From: Ciaran McCreesh To: gentoo-dev@lists.gentoo.org Subject: Re: [gentoo-dev] Re: Re: Monthly Gentoo Council Reminder for January Message-ID: <20080106025825.2bedc1f1@snowcone> In-Reply-To: <47804281.3010000@gentoo.org> References: <20080101103002.083C4652C4@smtp.gentoo.org> <54551.192.168.2.159.1199365359.squirrel@www.aei-tech.com> <477D75CA.1030003@gentoo.org> <20080104000155.23e056b4@snowcone> <20080104004653.039f488e@snowcone> <20080104012750.63f4f23a@snowcone> <63044.68.54.223.178.1199445791.squirrel@www.aei-tech.com> <20080104210213.50a99e6b@snowcone> <61164.68.54.223.178.1199485599.squirrel@www.aei-tech.com> <20080104223754.3fb48b85@snowcone> <1199506818.7609.30.camel@inertia.twi-31o2.org> <20080105043233.0935d2f8@snowcone> <20080105124751.0bef4908@gentoo.org> <20080106003246.6e4b6425@snowcone> <20080106013630.7e0a504b@snowcone> <47803A61.7000600@gentoo.org> <20080106022402.01174707@snowcone> <47803DA9.10000@gentoo.org> <20080106023852.25b42e4b@snowcone> <47804281.3010000@gentoo.org> X-Mailer: Claws Mail 3.2.0 (GTK+ 2.12.1; x86_64-pc-linux-gnu) Precedence: bulk List-Post: List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Subscribe: List-Id: Gentoo Linux mail X-BeenThere: gentoo-dev@gentoo.org Reply-to: gentoo-dev@lists.gentoo.org Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/signed; boundary="Sig_/BP3IYJKa.p5HLnsK=37+hBr"; protocol="application/pgp-signature"; micalg=PGP-SHA1 X-Archives-Salt: 8e78767e-95e6-4863-8ca4-5174158f6ad8 X-Archives-Hash: e06dae21ed16cef1995e2992195a343e --Sig_/BP3IYJKa.p5HLnsK=37+hBr Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable On Sat, 05 Jan 2008 20:52:49 -0600 Martin Jackson wrote: > That's making the assumption that anyone looked at it, of course. > Please note comment #9 on > http://bugs.gentoo.org/show_bug.cgi?id=3D198346. It was still ~8 days > from then that the setuptools keyword was added. >=20 > So, we have examples of impact due to delay in keywords/etc. Shall > we proceed with the discussion of what to do about it? http://www.gentoo.org/security/en/vulnerability-policy.xml The target for that GLSA was 20 days. 8 days is well within target. What are you moaning about? --=20 Ciaran McCreesh --Sig_/BP3IYJKa.p5HLnsK=37+hBr Content-Type: application/pgp-signature; name=signature.asc Content-Disposition: attachment; filename=signature.asc -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v2.0.7 (GNU/Linux) iD8DBQFHgEPT96zL6DUtXhERAnJ9AJ0ds2iwyQ8OLU1nTFAa+KmDShxovwCeKzuJ ciUZlHVW+kwjuJuLZppz+DU= =mHGP -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --Sig_/BP3IYJKa.p5HLnsK=37+hBr-- -- gentoo-dev@gentoo.org mailing list