From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from lists.gentoo.org ([140.105.134.102] helo=robin.gentoo.org) by finch.gentoo.org with esmtp (Exim 4.60) (envelope-from ) id 1JBLEQ-0003Hk-5a for garchives@archives.gentoo.org; Sun, 06 Jan 2008 02:27:22 +0000 Received: from robin.gentoo.org (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by robin.gentoo.org (8.14.2/8.14.0) with SMTP id m062QJaf006244; Sun, 6 Jan 2008 02:26:19 GMT Received: from smtp.ferdyx.org (170.Red-213-96-222.staticIP.rima-tde.net [213.96.222.170]) by robin.gentoo.org (8.14.2/8.14.0) with ESMTP id m062OACw003326 for ; Sun, 6 Jan 2008 02:24:10 GMT Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by smtp.ferdyx.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id F0E7E8D306 for ; Sun, 6 Jan 2008 03:30:04 +0100 (CET) X-Virus-Scanned: Debian amavisd-new at ferdyx.org Received: from smtp.ferdyx.org ([127.0.0.1]) by localhost (tungsteno.ferdyx.org [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id hQ3pXI9nSfua for ; Sun, 6 Jan 2008 03:30:02 +0100 (CET) Received: from snowcone (unknown [213.121.151.206]) (using TLSv1 with cipher DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by smtp.ferdyx.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id DB94D8D305 for ; Sun, 6 Jan 2008 03:30:01 +0100 (CET) Date: Sun, 6 Jan 2008 02:24:02 +0000 From: Ciaran McCreesh To: gentoo-dev@lists.gentoo.org Subject: Re: [gentoo-dev] Re: Re: Monthly Gentoo Council Reminder for January Message-ID: <20080106022402.01174707@snowcone> In-Reply-To: <47803A61.7000600@gentoo.org> References: <20080101103002.083C4652C4@smtp.gentoo.org> <54551.192.168.2.159.1199365359.squirrel@www.aei-tech.com> <477D75CA.1030003@gentoo.org> <20080104000155.23e056b4@snowcone> <20080104004653.039f488e@snowcone> <20080104012750.63f4f23a@snowcone> <63044.68.54.223.178.1199445791.squirrel@www.aei-tech.com> <20080104210213.50a99e6b@snowcone> <61164.68.54.223.178.1199485599.squirrel@www.aei-tech.com> <20080104223754.3fb48b85@snowcone> <1199506818.7609.30.camel@inertia.twi-31o2.org> <20080105043233.0935d2f8@snowcone> <20080105124751.0bef4908@gentoo.org> <20080106003246.6e4b6425@snowcone> <20080106013630.7e0a504b@snowcone> <47803A61.7000600@gentoo.org> X-Mailer: Claws Mail 3.2.0 (GTK+ 2.12.1; x86_64-pc-linux-gnu) Precedence: bulk List-Post: List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Subscribe: List-Id: Gentoo Linux mail X-BeenThere: gentoo-dev@gentoo.org Reply-to: gentoo-dev@lists.gentoo.org Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/signed; boundary="Sig_/t/GLXEarIF4uqdoWTLKoxBu"; protocol="application/pgp-signature"; micalg=PGP-SHA1 X-Archives-Salt: ee14b1b9-aeb6-4261-88c4-2e3ee76f1c36 X-Archives-Hash: dfe56dbb239fcab05a986b2f42f50759 --Sig_/t/GLXEarIF4uqdoWTLKoxBu Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable On Sat, 05 Jan 2008 20:18:09 -0600 Martin Jackson wrote: > See http://bugs.gentoo.org/show_bug.cgi?id=3D191550 - it took > 2 > months for mips to keyword it. >=20 > Security bugs are normally supposed to have enhanced priority for=20 > keywording, etc. Perhaps you should have explicitly stated in the bug that it was for security reasons and thus a priority. Make things easy for the arch teams -- if you have useful information like that, provide it in an easy to see place. Looking at that bug, I don't see anything indicating that there's any reason it should have been considered over more widely used packages. --=20 Ciaran McCreesh --Sig_/t/GLXEarIF4uqdoWTLKoxBu Content-Type: application/pgp-signature; name=signature.asc Content-Disposition: attachment; filename=signature.asc -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v2.0.7 (GNU/Linux) iD8DBQFHgDvF96zL6DUtXhERAuW1AJ98oCQVgtnH3A0funp67dUdC4hJoACcDgs8 6r6qhz6Jjq6jUDL6PvmT4IA= =JPVg -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --Sig_/t/GLXEarIF4uqdoWTLKoxBu-- -- gentoo-dev@gentoo.org mailing list