From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from lists.gentoo.org ([140.105.134.102] helo=robin.gentoo.org) by finch.gentoo.org with esmtp (Exim 4.60) (envelope-from ) id 1JBEom-0005qE-R0 for garchives@archives.gentoo.org; Sat, 05 Jan 2008 19:36:29 +0000 Received: from robin.gentoo.org (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by robin.gentoo.org (8.14.2/8.14.0) with SMTP id m05JZYMl008365; Sat, 5 Jan 2008 19:35:34 GMT Received: from smtp.gentoo.org (smtp.gentoo.org [140.211.166.183]) by robin.gentoo.org (8.14.2/8.14.0) with ESMTP id m05JXURj005907 for ; Sat, 5 Jan 2008 19:33:30 GMT Received: from iglu.bnet.local (d071051.adsl.hansenet.de [80.171.71.51]) (using TLSv1 with cipher DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by smtp.gentoo.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 137DA653A3 for ; Sat, 5 Jan 2008 19:33:30 +0000 (UTC) From: Carsten Lohrke To: gentoo-dev@lists.gentoo.org Subject: Re: [gentoo-dev] Re: Monthly Gentoo Council Reminder for January Date: Sat, 5 Jan 2008 20:32:41 +0100 User-Agent: KMail/1.9.7 References: <20080101103002.083C4652C4@smtp.gentoo.org> <477FBC0E.2090906@gentoo.org> <200801051927.32077.philantrop@gentoo.org> In-Reply-To: <200801051927.32077.philantrop@gentoo.org> Precedence: bulk List-Post: List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Subscribe: List-Id: Gentoo Linux mail X-BeenThere: gentoo-dev@gentoo.org Reply-to: gentoo-dev@lists.gentoo.org MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/signed; boundary="nextPart2625779.QghLNxBnQO"; protocol="application/pgp-signature"; micalg=pgp-sha1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Message-Id: <200801052033.19917.carlo@gentoo.org> X-Archives-Salt: 51f8a338-6af6-4760-948c-dd77a5157bea X-Archives-Hash: 5ea42f066ef727e7de88d96a713752db --nextPart2625779.QghLNxBnQO Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Content-Disposition: inline On Samstag, 5. Januar 2008, Wulf C. Krueger wrote: > > Anything other suggestions? > > Let the maintainer of said package decide on the keywording (and therefore > how to handle slacker arches). That's not a good idea. What Gentoo needs is users (and this includes=20 co-develoepers) having a reliable maintenance experience across the=20 repository and developers not following our maintenance policies to be=20 booted. In fact the MIPS team should have been given a last chance to reduc= e=20 the number of keyworded packages to a number the team can handle and=20 otherwise we should have said "Sorry, but goodbye MIPS." long long ago. That said, the only reason the old KDE ebuilds are still in the tree is tha= t I=20 didn't kick my ass to do it, yet. Carsten --nextPart2625779.QghLNxBnQO Content-Type: application/pgp-signature; name=signature.asc Content-Description: This is a digitally signed message part. -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v2.0.7 (GNU/Linux) iD8DBQBHf9t/VwbzmvGLSW8RAqdHAJ0SanAz/p+qat3+pv6XTK5jYp7/XACgsB90 gzPSPLfCaYOCns9KWY5mbg0= =hRIm -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --nextPart2625779.QghLNxBnQO-- -- gentoo-dev@gentoo.org mailing list