From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from lists.gentoo.org ([140.105.134.102] helo=robin.gentoo.org) by finch.gentoo.org with esmtp (Exim 4.60) (envelope-from ) id 1JB0kz-0006ZF-Qw for garchives@archives.gentoo.org; Sat, 05 Jan 2008 04:35:38 +0000 Received: from robin.gentoo.org (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by robin.gentoo.org (8.14.2/8.14.0) with SMTP id m054Yjk1006090; Sat, 5 Jan 2008 04:34:45 GMT Received: from smtp.ferdyx.org (170.Red-213-96-222.staticIP.rima-tde.net [213.96.222.170]) by robin.gentoo.org (8.14.2/8.14.0) with ESMTP id m054WfGn003716 for ; Sat, 5 Jan 2008 04:32:42 GMT Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by smtp.ferdyx.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id BFDA28D306 for ; Sat, 5 Jan 2008 05:38:28 +0100 (CET) X-Virus-Scanned: Debian amavisd-new at ferdyx.org Received: from smtp.ferdyx.org ([127.0.0.1]) by localhost (tungsteno.ferdyx.org [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id 89q8McHqAu4d for ; Sat, 5 Jan 2008 05:38:26 +0100 (CET) Received: from snowcone (unknown [213.121.151.206]) (using TLSv1 with cipher DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by smtp.ferdyx.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id AB4D48D305 for ; Sat, 5 Jan 2008 05:38:25 +0100 (CET) Date: Sat, 5 Jan 2008 04:32:33 +0000 From: Ciaran McCreesh To: gentoo-dev@lists.gentoo.org Subject: Re: [gentoo-dev] Re: Monthly Gentoo Council Reminder for January Message-ID: <20080105043233.0935d2f8@snowcone> In-Reply-To: <1199506818.7609.30.camel@inertia.twi-31o2.org> References: <20080101103002.083C4652C4@smtp.gentoo.org> <54551.192.168.2.159.1199365359.squirrel@www.aei-tech.com> <477D75CA.1030003@gentoo.org> <20080104000155.23e056b4@snowcone> <20080104004653.039f488e@snowcone> <20080104012750.63f4f23a@snowcone> <63044.68.54.223.178.1199445791.squirrel@www.aei-tech.com> <20080104210213.50a99e6b@snowcone> <61164.68.54.223.178.1199485599.squirrel@www.aei-tech.com> <20080104223754.3fb48b85@snowcone> <1199506818.7609.30.camel@inertia.twi-31o2.org> X-Mailer: Claws Mail 3.2.0 (GTK+ 2.12.1; x86_64-pc-linux-gnu) Precedence: bulk List-Post: List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Subscribe: List-Id: Gentoo Linux mail X-BeenThere: gentoo-dev@gentoo.org Reply-to: gentoo-dev@lists.gentoo.org Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/signed; boundary="Sig_/+HkA.wUMR_VisF60hT_Zmvs"; protocol="application/pgp-signature"; micalg=PGP-SHA1 X-Archives-Salt: f90d9b8a-2caf-462e-ad5b-a0b326e5972e X-Archives-Hash: cebbed0e4a6b57a4d6a065b4278ea933 --Sig_/+HkA.wUMR_VisF60hT_Zmvs Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable On Fri, 04 Jan 2008 20:20:18 -0800 Chris Gianelloni wrote: > No offense to anyone, but holding back hundreds of developers and > thousands of users for a handful of developers ...and how exactly are hundreds of developers and thousands of users being held back? So far as I can see, in cases where anyone really is being held back, the arch teams are quite happy to prioritise -- the people who go around moaning about 'slacker archs' rarely if ever actually have anything holding them back. If anyone has any examples of where they really are being held back and where they really have given the arch teams plenty of time to do something, I'd like to see them... Somehow I doubt it happens very often, if at all. --=20 Ciaran McCreesh --Sig_/+HkA.wUMR_VisF60hT_Zmvs Content-Type: application/pgp-signature; name=signature.asc Content-Disposition: attachment; filename=signature.asc -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v2.0.7 (GNU/Linux) iD8DBQFHfwhk96zL6DUtXhERAkLaAJ4ulZUsJ0wSPn+QQ9x04lNAqODrWgCdEdT+ PMeqSHbK5yOxQTvKVjW1zbA= =8EEb -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --Sig_/+HkA.wUMR_VisF60hT_Zmvs-- -- gentoo-dev@gentoo.org mailing list