From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from lists.gentoo.org ([140.105.134.102] helo=robin.gentoo.org) by finch.gentoo.org with esmtp (Exim 4.60) (envelope-from ) id 1JAa3c-0003ps-W9 for garchives@archives.gentoo.org; Fri, 04 Jan 2008 00:05:05 +0000 Received: from robin.gentoo.org (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by robin.gentoo.org (8.14.2/8.14.0) with SMTP id m0404ApM016739; Fri, 4 Jan 2008 00:04:10 GMT Received: from smtp.ferdyx.org (170.Red-213-96-222.staticIP.rima-tde.net [213.96.222.170]) by robin.gentoo.org (8.14.2/8.14.0) with ESMTP id m040246Z014085 for ; Fri, 4 Jan 2008 00:02:05 GMT Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by smtp.ferdyx.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 6326B8D306 for ; Fri, 4 Jan 2008 01:07:41 +0100 (CET) X-Virus-Scanned: Debian amavisd-new at ferdyx.org Received: from smtp.ferdyx.org ([127.0.0.1]) by localhost (tungsteno.ferdyx.org [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id 9N1qFm-QRSou for ; Fri, 4 Jan 2008 01:07:39 +0100 (CET) Received: from snowcone (unknown [213.121.151.206]) (using TLSv1 with cipher DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by smtp.ferdyx.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id A841F8D305 for ; Fri, 4 Jan 2008 01:07:38 +0100 (CET) Date: Fri, 4 Jan 2008 00:01:55 +0000 From: Ciaran McCreesh To: gentoo-dev@lists.gentoo.org Subject: Re: [gentoo-dev] Monthly Gentoo Council Reminder for January Message-ID: <20080104000155.23e056b4@snowcone> In-Reply-To: <477D75CA.1030003@gentoo.org> References: <20080101103002.083C4652C4@smtp.gentoo.org> <54551.192.168.2.159.1199365359.squirrel@www.aei-tech.com> <477D75CA.1030003@gentoo.org> X-Mailer: Claws Mail 3.2.0 (GTK+ 2.12.1; x86_64-pc-linux-gnu) Precedence: bulk List-Post: List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Subscribe: List-Id: Gentoo Linux mail X-BeenThere: gentoo-dev@gentoo.org Reply-to: gentoo-dev@lists.gentoo.org Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/signed; boundary="Sig_/OPv_wK.hGJ.Cxl8B3t6Nu5y"; protocol="application/pgp-signature"; micalg=PGP-SHA1 X-Archives-Salt: d5bb5490-0475-4fd4-94db-443664d17cda X-Archives-Hash: 60bfa98a9640b1cc4ca7e6494f4e2593 --Sig_/OPv_wK.hGJ.Cxl8B3t6Nu5y Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable On Fri, 04 Jan 2008 00:54:50 +0100 Luca Barbato wrote: > I'd suggest something like "if nobody could test your update in a > timely way you should ask and possibly get an account on an arch box > in order to test it and bump if the minimal test pass" >=20 > sounds fair? Sounds like a great way to get more broken packages, which means more work for arch teams fixing them, which means less time available for fixing important bugs. --=20 Ciaran McCreesh --Sig_/OPv_wK.hGJ.Cxl8B3t6Nu5y Content-Type: application/pgp-signature; name=signature.asc Content-Disposition: attachment; filename=signature.asc -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v2.0.7 (GNU/Linux) iD8DBQFHfXd396zL6DUtXhERAjS3AKCMiS/6l/4IbzQO+3uhlBTttVD+wgCfXX40 ouz8pGCjEQN2BQGsHVy8iPk= =B9WT -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --Sig_/OPv_wK.hGJ.Cxl8B3t6Nu5y-- -- gentoo-dev@gentoo.org mailing list