From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from lists.gentoo.org ([140.105.134.102] helo=robin.gentoo.org) by finch.gentoo.org with esmtp (Exim 4.60) (envelope-from ) id 1J65k2-0002y1-Ue for garchives@archives.gentoo.org; Sat, 22 Dec 2007 14:54:19 +0000 Received: from robin.gentoo.org (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by robin.gentoo.org (8.14.2/8.14.0) with SMTP id lBMErRjN029121; Sat, 22 Dec 2007 14:53:27 GMT Received: from fk-out-0910.google.com (fk-out-0910.google.com [209.85.128.188]) by robin.gentoo.org (8.14.2/8.14.0) with ESMTP id lBMEooUR025348 for ; Sat, 22 Dec 2007 14:50:52 GMT Received: by fk-out-0910.google.com with SMTP id 18so1681987fkq.2 for ; Sat, 22 Dec 2007 06:50:50 -0800 (PST) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=domainkey-signature:received:received:from:reply-to:to:subject:date:user-agent:references:in-reply-to:mime-version:content-type:content-transfer-encoding:content-disposition:message-id:sender; bh=niwo3Ra/ZQKOj2/SHHGBCCcWE+v5cVaCigdjLJLj50k=; b=IjfgpK8OTtE74alDGwHFHSdjWgL6rQLlSEjePI/JEt5PlgXhgJVzFZk6anAKKmbyCbhGnt0o3sKnIFgkPlNTDwadhMh7Avb6ZP2rBggWAiO/x5Bt+R8DAG3Yw6KzaEAHY/sor3OwjgT1IySdoM2KMP+SPaSsKm7ctG8+hmbj2sg= DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=from:reply-to:to:subject:date:user-agent:references:in-reply-to:mime-version:content-type:content-transfer-encoding:content-disposition:message-id:sender; b=OvUcgY1imRaJtVhry4YX+cu86FHnDOqsYRxt0y7bdAWBpsPMkjrqRMJxfrpEsOuNVHc+tc5YTdqPRSbISXaHOXA1NrEDkRku0HM5PJw0yyay8An8FonWw/Ar3QGXKDvYnLfgutgsdF1KQ1+s8niTnOn5lzvM6Wlnp5Rj69W6Hm4= Received: by 10.82.171.16 with SMTP id t16mr4517291bue.11.1198335050062; Sat, 22 Dec 2007 06:50:50 -0800 (PST) Received: from phoebe.lan ( [212.76.57.12]) by mx.google.com with ESMTPS id e9sm6408214muf.11.2007.12.22.06.50.47 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=OTHER); Sat, 22 Dec 2007 06:50:49 -0800 (PST) From: Piotr =?utf-8?q?Jaroszy=C5=84ski?= To: gentoo-dev@lists.gentoo.org Subject: Re: [gentoo-dev] Re: [GLEP] Use EAPI-suffixed ebuilds (.ebuild-EAPI) Date: Sat, 22 Dec 2007 15:50:43 +0100 User-Agent: KMail/1.9.7 References: <200712172320.01988.peper@gentoo.org> <20071222071328.72f16140@blueyonder.co.uk> In-Reply-To: Precedence: bulk List-Post: List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Subscribe: List-Id: Gentoo Linux mail X-BeenThere: gentoo-dev@gentoo.org Reply-to: gentoo-dev@lists.gentoo.org MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Content-Disposition: inline Message-Id: <200712221550.44258.peper@gentoo.org> Sender: =?UTF-8?B?UGlvdHIgSmFyb3N6ecWEc2tp?= X-Archives-Salt: b3d2198b-d6eb-4a5e-8825-349a067de468 X-Archives-Hash: f8ef43f4e4f6ebf8248d91f1158610e6 On Saturday 22 of December 2007 12:03:33 Duncan wrote: > I actually thought the point was pretty effective, given what it was in > reply to. If it were me the elementary school reply was made to, I'd > have felt it within my rights to ask for an apology. I therefore > considered the ietf remark a rather clever reply to the innuendo, making > the point delicately, while avoiding the loss of face challenge asking > for an apology presents. How is it fair that some people do their own research and some ask to be=20 educated and for the discussion to be delayed? =2D-=20 Best Regards, Piotr Jaroszy=C5=84ski -- gentoo-dev@gentoo.org mailing list