From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from lists.gentoo.org ([140.105.134.102] helo=robin.gentoo.org) by finch.gentoo.org with esmtp (Exim 4.60) (envelope-from ) id 1J5Z7Z-0001S8-83 for garchives@archives.gentoo.org; Fri, 21 Dec 2007 04:04:25 +0000 Received: from robin.gentoo.org (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by robin.gentoo.org (8.14.2/8.14.0) with SMTP id lBL42IRJ000997; Fri, 21 Dec 2007 04:02:18 GMT Received: from smtp.ferdyx.org (170.Red-213-96-222.staticIP.rima-tde.net [213.96.222.170]) by robin.gentoo.org (8.14.2/8.14.0) with ESMTP id lBL3xKr3028289 for ; Fri, 21 Dec 2007 03:59:20 GMT Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by smtp.ferdyx.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id E53878D306 for ; Fri, 21 Dec 2007 05:02:58 +0100 (CET) X-Virus-Scanned: Debian amavisd-new at ferdyx.org Received: from smtp.ferdyx.org ([127.0.0.1]) by localhost (tungsteno.ferdyx.org [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id UxiJpcZMZEhG for ; Fri, 21 Dec 2007 05:02:56 +0100 (CET) Received: from localhost (unknown [213.121.151.206]) (using TLSv1 with cipher DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by smtp.ferdyx.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 129D78D305 for ; Fri, 21 Dec 2007 05:02:55 +0100 (CET) Date: Fri, 21 Dec 2007 03:59:14 +0000 From: Ciaran McCreesh To: gentoo-dev@lists.gentoo.org Subject: Re: [gentoo-dev] Re: Re: Re: [GLEP] Use EAPI-suffixed ebuilds (.ebuild-EAPI) Message-ID: <20071221035914.23911eec@blueyonder.co.uk> In-Reply-To: <476B3827.1000603@gentoo.org> References: <200712172320.01988.peper@gentoo.org> <47671006.2020808@gentoo.org> <20071218001855.78c1864c@blueyonder.co.uk> <20071218013651.58f4f565@eusebe> <20071218172143.GB4423@ferdyx.org> <20071219102951.515beeca@blueyonder.co.uk> <20071219111602.4122c53d@blueyonder.co.uk> <476AB85C.1040902@gentoo.org> <20071221004930.15b8f330@blueyonder.co.uk> <476B2174.6040904@gentoo.org> <20071221022324.6626bd20@blueyonder.co.uk> <476B2A54.8030606@gentoo.org> <20071221025615.774481c2@blueyonder.co.uk> <476B3827.1000603@gentoo.org> X-Mailer: Claws Mail 3.1.0 (GTK+ 2.12.1; x86_64-pc-linux-gnu) Precedence: bulk List-Post: List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Subscribe: List-Id: Gentoo Linux mail X-BeenThere: gentoo-dev@gentoo.org Reply-to: gentoo-dev@lists.gentoo.org Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/signed; boundary="Sig_/NNgoKKXJdvYbu1nIpVMtJ=f"; protocol="application/pgp-signature"; micalg=PGP-SHA1 X-Archives-Salt: 49aca757-c953-405f-8334-9a986ec8eb07 X-Archives-Hash: 92fe99a8a793c2800cd14c8be5ac5a6e --Sig_/NNgoKKXJdvYbu1nIpVMtJ=f Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable On Fri, 21 Dec 2007 11:51:03 +0800 Zhang Le wrote: > That's the problem about the agreement between PM and ebuild. >=20 > If this is agreed upon > >>>>> import vim-spell using language=3D"en" > You should be able to get it. >=20 > If not, then blame the ebuild writer. There is no problem with the > agreement. Uh... It's not agreed upon currently. It may be agreed upon in the future, but that's no good for current package managers. Current package managers have to be able to deal with future agreements, without limiting those future agreements to not being able to make changes like the above example. > > Bear in mind that > > package managers can only use what's been agreed upon at the time > > they were released, not what might be agreed upon later -- and yet > > they need to be able to extract the EAPI from anything agreed upon > > later. >=20 > Exactly my point. So we all agree that suffixes are the solution, since they solve this problem and in-ebuild-content restrictions don't. Good. --=20 Ciaran McCreesh --Sig_/NNgoKKXJdvYbu1nIpVMtJ=f Content-Type: application/pgp-signature; name=signature.asc Content-Disposition: attachment; filename=signature.asc -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v1.4.7 (GNU/Linux) iD8DBQFHazoS96zL6DUtXhERAle8AKCI7j/BMmKs7uCRdKkji4gtxTXCngCgqksL Vkh+tWM0K/4T272wIwkrpr4= =x8AR -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --Sig_/NNgoKKXJdvYbu1nIpVMtJ=f-- -- gentoo-dev@gentoo.org mailing list