From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from lists.gentoo.org ([140.105.134.102] helo=robin.gentoo.org) by finch.gentoo.org with esmtp (Exim 4.60) (envelope-from ) id 1J5EOW-000770-VH for garchives@archives.gentoo.org; Thu, 20 Dec 2007 05:56:33 +0000 Received: from robin.gentoo.org (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by robin.gentoo.org (8.14.2/8.14.0) with SMTP id lBK5tQc1019383; Thu, 20 Dec 2007 05:55:26 GMT Received: from smtp.ferdyx.org (170.Red-213-96-222.staticIP.rima-tde.net [213.96.222.170]) by robin.gentoo.org (8.14.2/8.14.0) with ESMTP id lBK5rQh5017036 for ; Thu, 20 Dec 2007 05:53:26 GMT Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by smtp.ferdyx.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 41E5A8D306 for ; Thu, 20 Dec 2007 06:56:56 +0100 (CET) X-Virus-Scanned: Debian amavisd-new at ferdyx.org Received: from smtp.ferdyx.org ([127.0.0.1]) by localhost (tungsteno.ferdyx.org [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id EIkZq3ihheuz for ; Thu, 20 Dec 2007 06:56:53 +0100 (CET) Received: from localhost (unknown [213.121.151.206]) (using TLSv1 with cipher DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by smtp.ferdyx.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 5A02A8D305 for ; Thu, 20 Dec 2007 06:56:53 +0100 (CET) Date: Thu, 20 Dec 2007 05:53:18 +0000 From: Ciaran McCreesh To: gentoo-dev@lists.gentoo.org Subject: Re: [gentoo-dev] [GLEP] Use EAPI-suffixed ebuilds (.ebuild-EAPI) Message-ID: <20071220055318.53cd78a0@blueyonder.co.uk> In-Reply-To: <20071220064644.60aa9572@eusebe> References: <200712172320.01988.peper@gentoo.org> <20071218001855.78c1864c@blueyonder.co.uk> <20071218013651.58f4f565@eusebe> <200712180201.25872.bo.andresen@zlin.dk> <20071218220852.3f34edae@eusebe> <20071219000917.716749ee@blueyonder.co.uk> <20071219081224.15bf437f@eusebe> <20071219103208.1a077a96@blueyonder.co.uk> <20071220064644.60aa9572@eusebe> X-Mailer: Claws Mail 3.1.0 (GTK+ 2.12.1; x86_64-pc-linux-gnu) Precedence: bulk List-Post: List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Subscribe: List-Id: Gentoo Linux mail X-BeenThere: gentoo-dev@gentoo.org Reply-to: gentoo-dev@lists.gentoo.org Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/signed; boundary="Sig_/DxRPW296w2zy/akxDW5kfqd"; protocol="application/pgp-signature"; micalg=PGP-SHA1 X-Archives-Salt: 624e9fa6-ab11-4753-9a9b-a6df3a3cf1eb X-Archives-Hash: 2fb0d68ad4c37d2dc90513b11621d0c7 --Sig_/DxRPW296w2zy/akxDW5kfqd Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable On Thu, 20 Dec 2007 06:46:44 +0100 Thomas de Grenier de Latour wrote: > On 2007/12/19, Ciaran McCreesh > wrote: > > On Wed, 19 Dec 2007 08:12:24 +0100 > > Thomas de Grenier de Latour wrote: > > > You're done as long as ebuilds are written in bash. > >=20 > > Not even that. What if people decide that rather than writing > > EAPI=3D"blah", "eapi blah" is cleaner?=20 >=20 > Yeah, and file names suffixes won't work anymore as soon as it has=20 > arbitrarily been decided that prefixes should be used instead, or that > EAPI must disappear because using explicit sets of named features is > better than using names of some particular sets. That rules only holds > as long as they don't change is not an argument, but a truism. Uh, it works in both those cases. The package manager will simply not see the ebuild at all. Which is pretty much the point... --=20 Ciaran McCreesh --Sig_/DxRPW296w2zy/akxDW5kfqd Content-Type: application/pgp-signature; name=signature.asc Content-Disposition: attachment; filename=signature.asc -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v1.4.7 (GNU/Linux) iD8DBQFHagNO96zL6DUtXhERAl+XAKCodM0QsiR20Wcs95jZWnsGo3jOEgCbBQa3 H4LuKKg5juqv4oyQ2XCUmKw= =qiR6 -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --Sig_/DxRPW296w2zy/akxDW5kfqd-- -- gentoo-dev@gentoo.org mailing list